[1] Bates M J. The design of browsing and berrypicking: Techniques for the online search interface[J]. Online Review,1989,13(5):407-424.
[2] Marchionini G. Exploratory search: From finding to understanding[J]. Communications of the ACM, 2006, 49(4):41-46.
[3] White R W, Roth R A. Exploratory search: Beyond the query-response paradigm[M]. Sam Rafael:Morgan & Claypool, 2009: 16-18.
[4] 蒋波,章菁华.1980-2009年国内眼动研究的文献计量分析[J].心理科学,2011(1):235-239.
[5] Granka L A, Joachims T, Gay G. Eye-tracking analysis of user behavior in WWW search[C]//Proceedings of the 27th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New York:ACM,2004:478-479.
[6] Lorigo L, Pan Bing, Hembrooke H, et al. The influence of task and gender on search and evaluation behavior using Google[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2006, 42(4): 1123-1131.
[7] Pan Bing, Hembrooke H, Joachims T, et al. In Google we trust: Users' decisions on rank, position, and relevance[J]. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,2007,12(3): 801-823.
[8] Lorigo L, Haridasan M, Brynjarsdóttir H, et al. Eye tracking and online search: Lessons learned and challenges ahead[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008,59(7): 1041-1052.
[9] Kules B, Capra R, Banta M, et al. What do exploratory searchers look at in a faceted search interface?[C]//Proceedings of the 9th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. New York:ACM, 2009:313-322.
[10] Capra R, Kules B, Banta M, et al. Faceted search for library catalogs: Developing grounded tasks and analyzing eye-tracking data[C]//Proceeding of the Workshop on Understanding the User-Logging and Interpreting User Interactions in Information Search and Retrieva. Tilburg:CEUR-WS, 2009:16-18.
[11] Guan Zhiwei, Cutrell E. An eye tracking study of the effect of target rank on Web search[C]//Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York:ACM, 2007:417-420.
[12] Terai H, Saito H, Egusa Y, et al. Differences between informational and transactional tasks in information seeking on the Web[C]//Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Information Interaction in Context. New York:ACM, 2008:152-159.
[13] Saito H, Terai H, Egusa Y, et al. How task types and user experiences affect information-seeking behavior on the Web: Using eye-tracking and client-side search logs[C]//Understanding the User-Logging and Interpreting User Interactions in Information Search and Retrieval (UIIR-2009).Tilburg:CEUR-WS, 2009: 19-22.
[14] Saito H, Takaku M, Egusa Y, et al.Connecting qualitative and quantitative analysis of Web search process: analysis using search units[C]//Proceedings of the 6th Asia Information Retrieval Societies Conference.Berlin: Springer,2010:173-182.
[15] Rele R S, Duchowski A T. Using eye tracking to evaluate alternative search results interfaces[C]//Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting.Los Angeles:HFES, 2005, 49 (15):1459-1463.
[16] Kammerer Y, Gerjets P. How the interface design influences users' spontaneous trustworthiness evaluations of Web search results:Comparing a list and a grid interface[C]//Proceedings of the 2010 Symposium on Eye-Tracking Research & Applications.New York:ACM,2010:299-306.
[17] Kammerer Y, Gerjets P. Effects of search interface and Internet-specific epistemic beliefs on source evaluations during Web search for medical information: An eye-tracking study[J].Behaviour & Information Technology, 2012, 31(1):83-97.
[18] Buscher G, Dumais S T, Cutrell E. The good, the bad, and the random: An eye-tracking study of ad quality in Web search[C]//Proceedings of the 33rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New York:ACM,2010: 42-49.
[19] González-Caro C, Marcos M C. Different users and intents: An eye-tracking analysis of web search[C]//Proceedings of the 4th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. New York:ACM, 2011:9-12.
[20] Joachims T, Granka L, Pan Bing, et al. Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback[C]//Proceedings of the 28th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval.New York:ACM, 2005: 154-161.
[21] Kammerer Y, Wollny E, Gerjets P, et al. How authority-related epistemological beliefs and salience of source information influence the evaluation of Web search results–An eye tracking study[C]//Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. New York:ACM,2009: 2158-2163.
[22] Liu Jingjing, Cole M J, Liu Chang, et al. Search behaviors in different task types[C]//Proceedings of the 10th Annual Joint Conference on Digital Libraries.New York:ACM,2010: 69-78.
[23] Gerjets P, Kammerer Y, Werner B. Measuring spontaneous and instructed evaluation processes during Web search: Integrating concurrent thinking-aloud protocols and eye-tracking data[J]. Learning and Instruction, 2011, 21(2):220-231.
[24] 徐贲.CNKI文献关联推荐用户选择行为的实验研究[D].杭州:浙江师范大学,2011.
[25] Broder A. A taxonomy of Web search[J]. SIGIR Forum, 2002,36(2):3-10. |