基于科研众包模式的公众科学项目运作机制初探——以Evolution MegaLab为例

doi:10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.01.001

图书情报工作 ›› 2017, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (1): 5-13.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.01.001

基于科研众包模式的公众科学项目运作机制初探——以Evolution MegaLab为例

牛毅冲¹, 赵宇翔², 朱庆华¹

1. 南京大学信息管理学院南京 210023;
2. 南京理工大学经济管理学院南京 210094

收稿日期:2016-10-12 修回日期:2016-12-13 出版日期:2017-01-05 发布日期:2017-01-05
通讯作者: 赵宇翔(IRCID:0000-0001-9281-3030),教授,通讯作者,E-mail:yxzhao@vip.163.com。
作者简介:牛毅冲(ORCID:0000-0003-4828-7824),硕士研究生;朱庆华(ORCID:0000-0002-4879-399X),教授,博士生导师。
基金资助:
本文系国家自然科学基金项目“基于行动者网络框架的众包模式设计与管理研究”（项目编号：71403119）研究成果之一。

Exploring the Operation Mechanism of Research Crowdsourcing Oriented Citizen Science Project: A Case Study of Evolution MegaLab

Niu Yichong¹, Zhao Yuxiang², Zhu Qinghua¹

1. School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023;
2. School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094

Received:2016-10-12 Revised:2016-12-13 Online:2017-01-05 Published:2017-01-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

[目的/意义] 研究公众科学项目运作的原理与机制，为我国公众科学项目的开展提供明确的理论和行动指导。[方法/过程] 通过文献资料收集和研究，归纳出公众科学项目运作的框架和基本流程，并以典型公众科学项目Evolution MegaLab为案例，提炼出公众科学项目运作三大阶段。[结果/结论] 根据案例分析结果提出由前期投入、中期行动、后期产出三大阶段构成的公众科学项目运作流程，并详细说明各个阶段所包含的基本活动和关键步骤，总结Evolution MegaLab案例对我国公众科学发展的启示。

关键词: 公众科学, 群体智慧, 群体参与, 科研众包, 运作机制

Abstract:

[Purpose/significance] This paper presents a preliminary reflection on the operation mechanism of citizen science projects oriented by research crowdsourcing mode, to provide theoretical and practical guidance for the development of citizen science projects in China.[Method/process] This paper summarizes the framework and basic procedure of citizen science projects through systematical literature review, and describes a three-stage model of the operation mechanism for citizen science programs. Evolution MegaLab has been selected as a case.[Result/conclusion] This paper conducts a case study to examine the operation model of citizen science projects that includes three stages of inputs, activities and outcomes; it also yields some implications for the development of citizen science projects in China.

Key words: citizen science, wisdom of crowds, mass participation, research crowdsourcing, operation mechanism

中图分类号:

G250

牛毅冲, 赵宇翔, 朱庆华. 基于科研众包模式的公众科学项目运作机制初探——以Evolution MegaLab为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(1): 5-13.

Niu Yichong, Zhao Yuxiang, Zhu Qinghua. Exploring the Operation Mechanism of Research Crowdsourcing Oriented Citizen Science Project: A Case Study of Evolution MegaLab[J]. LIS, 2017, 61(1): 5-13.

参考文献

[1] 胡昭阳.众包科学:网络传播语境下的公众参与创新[D].合肥:中国科学技术大学,2015.
[2] 胡昭阳,汤书昆.众包科学:网络时代公众参与科学的全新尝试——基于英国"星系动物园"众包科学组织与传播过程的讨论[J].科普研究,2015(4):12-21.
[3] 张九庆.科研众包对中国科研活动的影响[J].中国科技论坛,2015(3):1.
[4] 庞建刚,刘志迎.科研众包参与主体及流程的特殊性[J].中国科技论坛, 2015(12):16-32.
[5] SAUERMANN H, FRANZONI C.Crowd science user contribution patterns and their implications[J]. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences,2015,112(3):679-684.
[6] SILVERTOWN J.A new dawn for citizen science[J].Trends in ecology and evolution, 2009, 24(9):467-471.
[7] BONNEY R, COPPER C B, DICKINSON J, et al. Citizen science:a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy[J]. BioScience,2009, 59(11):977-984.
[8] SHIRK J L, BALLARD H L, WILDERMAN C C, et al. Public participation in scientific research:a framework for deliberate design[J]. Ecology and society,2012,17(2):29-48.
[9] 孟祥利,王娟,李爱菊,等.科研项目管理中的公众参与[J].中国高校科技, 2014(Z1):45-46.
[10] ZWASS V.Co-creation:toward a taxonomy and an integrated research perspective[J]. International journal of electronic commerce,2010,15(1):11-48.
[11] CONRAD C C, HILCHEY K G.A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring:issues and opportunities[J].Environ monit assess,2011,176(1-4):273-291.
[12] WIEDERHOLD B K.Citizen scientists generate benefits for researchers,educators,society,and themselves[J]. Cyberpsychology behavior and social networking,2011,14(12):703-704.
[13] SAGARRA O, GUTIÉRREZ-ROIG M, BONHOURE I, et al. Citizen science practices for computational socialscience research:the conceptualization of pop-up experiments[J].Frontiers in physics, 2016,3(93):1-14.
[14] CRAIN R, COOPER C, DICKINSON J L.Citizen science:a tool for integrating studies of human and natural systems[J]. Annual review of environment and resources,2014, 39(1):641-665.
[15] DICKINSON J L, ZUCKERBERG B, BONTER D N. Citizen science as an ecological research tool:challenges and benefits[J].Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics,2010, 41(12):149-172.
[16] JORDAN R C, GARY S A. Knowledge gain and behavioral change in citizen-science programs[J]. Conversation biology,2011,25(6):1148-1154.
[17] BONNEY R, SHIRK J L. Next steps for citizen science[J]. Science, 2014, 343(6178):1436-1437.
[18] BONNEY R, PHILLIPS T B, BALLARD H L, et al. Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science?[J]. Public understanding of science,2016,25(1):2-16.
[19] MANKOWSKI T A, SLATER S J, SLATER T F. An interpretive study of meanings of citizen scientists make when participating in galaxy zoo[J]. Education research,2011, 4(4):25-42.
[20] 黄敏聪.公民科研的兴起及图书馆的角色[J].图书情报工作,2014,58(14):59-60.
[21] WORTHINGTON J P, SILVERTOWN J, COOK L, et al. Evolution MegaLab:a case study in citizen science methods[J]. Methods in ecology and evolution,2012,3(2):303-309.
[22] CURTIS V. Motivation to participate in an online citizen science game:a study of foldit[J]. Science communication,2015,37(6):723-746.
[23] FRANZONI C, SAUERMANN H. Crowd science:the organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects[J]. Research policy,2014,43(1):1-20.
[24] TWEDDLE J C, ROBINSON L D, POCOCK M J O, et al. Guide to citizen science:developing, implementing and evaluating citizen science to study biodiversity and the environment in the UK[OL].[2016-03-14].https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277036013.
[25] ROTMAN D, PREECE J, HAMMOCK J, et al. Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects[C]//Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work.Seattle:ACM,2012.
[26] KOBORI H, DICKINSON J L. Citizen science:a new approach to advance ecology, education, and conservation[J].Ecological research,2016,31(1):1-19.
[27] RIESCH H, POTTER C. Citizen science as seen by scientists:methodological,epistemological and ethical dimensions[J].Public understanding of science,2014,23(1):107-120.
[28] GALLO T, WAITT D. Creating a successful citizen science model to detect and report invasive species[J].Bioscience,2011,61(6):459-465.
[29] 张健,陈圣宾,陈彬,等.公众科学:整合科学研究、生态保护和公众参与[J].生物多样性,2013(6):738-749.
[30] NEWMAN G, WIGGINS A, CRALL A, et al. The future of citizen science:emerging technologies and shifting paradigms[J].Frontiers in ecology and the environment,2012, 10(6):298-304.
[31] 卫垌圻,姜涛,陶斯宇,等.科研众包——科研合作的新模式[J].科学管理研究,2015,33(2):16-19.

基于科研众包模式的公众科学项目运作机制初探——以Evolution MegaLab为例

Exploring the Operation Mechanism of Research Crowdsourcing Oriented Citizen Science Project: A Case Study of Evolution MegaLab

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 12

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	薛翔, 赵宇翔, 朱庆华, 应峻, 郝世博. 基于公众科学模式的重大公共卫生事件开放数据服务生态系统构建[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(4): 33-44.
[2]	汤健, 周鑫雪, 余美华. 反馈信息类型与效价对公众科学志愿者参与表现激励效应的实验研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(9): 51-61.
[3]	盛小平, 秦颢洋. 公众科学视角下的科学数据开放共享合作行为分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(23): 4-12.
[4]	徐孝娟, 吴曼丽, 邓金雨, 赵宇翔. 公众科学情境下科学素养研究:全球进展及我国启示[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(11): 123-132.
[5]	苏幼停, 许春漫. 美国高校图书馆公众科学服务实践及启示[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(3): 129-137.
[6]	金瑛, 张晓林, 胡智慧. 公众科学的发展与挑战[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(13): 28-33.
[7]	周鑫雪, 汤健, 王天梅. 任务特征与游戏化设计对公众科学参与意愿影响的实验研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(23): 97-105.
[8]	寇蕾蕾, 祝忠明, 白林林. 科研众包项目的协作模式研究——以Crowd Research为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(22): 146-152.
[9]	赵栋祥. 公众科学平台:发展现状、服务实践与启示——以Zooniverse为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(17): 120-128.
[10]	尚新丽. 支持群体参与的语义网本体构建方式MMOC解析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2011, 55(18): 121-124.
[11]	方善红. 文学网站内容生产的“微支付”模式与版权解决体系分析——以盛大网络为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2010, 54(16): 103-107.
[12]	尚珊苗菁. 中美虚拟咨询企业知识服务中的运作机制比较——以InnoCentive公司和疑客中国为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2010, 54(08): 98-102.