图书情报工作 ›› 2017, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (8): 43-53.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.08.005

• 工作研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

中外图书馆学科服务研究对比分析

王焕景, 孙兴敏   

  1. 曲阜师范大学传媒学院 日照 276826
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-25 修回日期:2017-03-29 出版日期:2017-04-20 发布日期:2017-04-20
  • 作者简介:王焕景(ORCID:0000-0003-2948-8444),副教授,博士研究生,E-mail:whjqfnu@163.com;孙兴敏(ORCID:0000-0002-2668-1719),硕士研究生。
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究项目"全纳视阈下高校图书馆泛在知识服务研究"(项目编号:13YJC870025)

Comparative Analysis of Domestic and International Library Subject Services

Wang Huanjing, Sun Xingmin   

  1. School of Communication, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276826
  • Received:2016-12-25 Revised:2017-03-29 Online:2017-04-20 Published:2017-04-20

摘要: [目的/意义]以WOS和CSSCI中收录的1998-2015年间学科服务领域的研究论文为样本数据,对国内外学科服务的理论研究现状进行定量化比较分析,以期为国内相关研究提供参考。[方法/过程]借助CiteSpaceⅢ、Ucinet、NetDraw等可视化工具分别绘制国内外学科服务研究的文献共被引时区视图、高频关键词共现网络图谱与共词聚类知识图谱,对国内外学科服务理论研究的时间分布、知识演化路径、研究热点与主题进行比较分析。[结果/结论]研究结果表明,国内外学科服务研究在研究重心、研究方向、文献影响力、引文性质、研究内容等方面存在差异。

关键词: 学科服务, 图书馆, 演化路径, 研究热点

Abstract: [Purpose/significance] This study mainly uses the methods of Scientometrics to carry out the quantitative comparison analysis on the current status of the theoretical research on the subject services at home and aboard that are based on the papers included in the database of WOS and CSSCI during 1997-2015, in order to provide references for domestic research.[Method/process] Using the visualization software CiteSpace III, Ucinet, NetDraw to draw the knowledge maps of document co-citation, high frequency keyword co-occurrence and co-words cluster networks, this paper compared the amount of articles, research trunk pathes, hotspots at home and aboard respectively.[Result/conclusion] There are differences in the research focus, research direction, literature influence, citation nature and research content at home and abroad.

Key words: subject services, library, evolution path, research hotspots

中图分类号: