图书情报工作 ›› 2018, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (23): 119-131.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.23.015

• 综述述评 • 上一篇    下一篇

领域前沿识别方法综述

罗瑞1,2, 许海云1,3, 董坤1,2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院成都文献情报中心 成都 610041;
    2. 中国科学院大学经济与管理学院图书情报与档案管理系 北京 100190;
    3. 中国科学技术信息研究所 北京 100038
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-15 修回日期:2018-08-13 出版日期:2018-12-05 发布日期:2018-12-05
  • 通讯作者: 许海云(ORCID:0000-0002-7453-3331),副研究员,博士,通讯作者,E-mail:xuhy@clas.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:罗瑞(ORCID:0000-0002-5234-8901),硕士研究生;董坤(ORCID:0000-0001-8455-9204),博士研究生。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家自然科学基金项目“基于科学-技术主题关联分析的创新演化路径识别方法研究”(项目编号:71704170)、中国博士后科学基金资助项目“面向多关系融合的知识创新路径的识别与预测方法研究”(项目编号:2016M590124)和中国科学院青年创新促进会(项目编号:2016159)研究成果之一。

A Review of the Main Recognition Methods of Frontier Research

Luo Rui1,2, Xu Haiyun1,3, Dong Kun1,2   

  1. 1. Chengdu Documentation and Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041;
    2. School of Economic and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;
    3. Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China, Beijing 100038
  • Received:2018-04-15 Revised:2018-08-13 Online:2018-12-05 Published:2018-12-05

摘要: [目的/意义]通过比较分析不同的领域前沿识别方法,总结各类方法在识别与预测前沿上的优缺点,为未来研究前沿的识别与预测提出改进意见。[方法/过程]通过综述国内外研究前沿相关的文献,辨析研究前沿的相关概念。分析目前主要的研究前沿识别方法,相较于传统的识别方法,重点对变革性研究前沿的识别方法进行归纳。总结当前领域前沿识别方法存在的主要问题,并提出改进建议。[结果/结论]就概念而言,对“研究热点”、“新兴研究”和“研究前沿”的概念内涵在时间和创新程度两个维度上进行了区分,依据创新程度的不同,研究前沿可以分为“常规性研究前沿”和“变革性研究前沿”;就识别方法而言,不同方法都有其适用场景。未来需要深入挖掘“研究前沿”,尤其要关注到主题之间的语义关联和多源数据的多元关系融合,以及对“变革性研究前沿”的前期征兆进行特征挖掘,并构建相应的识别与预测方法。

关键词: 领域前沿, 研究前沿, 变革性创新, 新兴研究, 主题识别

Abstract: [Purpose/significance] This paper summarized the advantages and disadvantages of various recognition methods of frontier researches by comparing and analyzing these methods, and suggested improvements for future researches.[Method/process] Firstly, it reviewed the literatures related to research frontiers at home and abroad, and identified relevant concepts of the research frontier. Then, the paper analyzed the main exsited research methods for the identification of research frontiers. Comparing with the traditional identification methods, this paper emphasized the summary of recognition methods of transformative research frontiers. Finally, this study summarized the main problems existed in the frontier identification methods, and put forward suggestions for improving the research frontier identification methods.[Result/conclusion] In terms of conceptual meanings, this paper distinguished research hotspots, emerging researches and research frontiers in the dimensions of time and innovation. According to the different levels of innovation, research frontiers can be divided into conventional research frontiers and transformative research frontiers. In terms of identification methods, different methods have their own applicable scenes. In the future, it is necessary to further dig out the measurement features of the "research frontier", especially the semantic associations among topics and the fusion of multiple relations should be focused on, as well as the feature mining of the early signs of "transformation research frontier", and then constructing corresponding recognition and prediction methods.

Key words: forefronts, research frontier, transformative innovation, emerging research, topic recognition

中图分类号: