图书情报工作 ›› 2019, Vol. 63 ›› Issue (16): 14-21.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2019.16.002

• 理论研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

高被引主题结构与档案学科竞争力

陶俊, 黄新荣   

  1. 西北大学公共管理学院 西安 710127
  • 收稿日期:2018-11-06 修回日期:2019-02-11 出版日期:2019-08-20 发布日期:2019-08-20
  • 作者简介:陶俊(ORCID:0000-0002-5341-3509),副教授,博士,仲英青年学者,E-mail:taoj@nwu.edu.cn;黄新荣(ORCID:0000-0003-3881-8492),系主任,教授,博士。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系陕西省教育厅科研计划项目"高被引结构与图情学术竞争力研究"(项目编号:16JK1720)和西北大学教学改革项目"信息资源管理类专业嵌入大数据应用能力与课程链设计研究"(项目编号:JX17045)研究成果之一。

Subject Structure of Highly Cited Papers and Discipline Competitiveness in Archives

Tao Jun, Huang Xinrong   

  1. School of Public Management, Northwest University, Xi'an 710127
  • Received:2018-11-06 Revised:2019-02-11 Online:2019-08-20 Published:2019-08-20

摘要: [目的/意义]高校实施"双一流"推进学科开放竞争背景下,刻画档案学高被引论文主题结构对于认识档案学科竞争力和图情档学科整体竞争力十分重要。[方法/过程]在述评档案学科竞争力相关研究的基础上,从主题、演化和引用结构方面对档案学CSSCI来源期刊近年的高被引论文统计分析,刻画档案学科结构进而评价总体竞争力。[结果/结论]研究发现:档案学高被引主题集中在档案工作和学科建设领域;档案学理论、档案信息安全、信息技术应用三大主题篇均被引位居前三甲,但总体规模相对不足。上述结果表明,档案学科队伍总体发展相对不均衡,档案学竞争力主要来自于档案工作研究,而对更具竞争力的档案学理论探索和影响学科发展的新兴技术主题研究规模不足。未来提升档案学科竞争力需从增强图情档学科整体竞争力出发,实施统筹划分学科方向并优化学科结构,重构核心领域竞争优势,基于学科融合与开放战略提升档案学理论层次。

关键词: 档案学, 高被引论文, 主题结构, 学科竞争力

Abstract: [Purpose/significance] It is crucial to describe the subject structure of highly cited papers in archival science in order to understand the competitiveness of archival disciplines and the overall competitiveness of library, information& archival disciplines under the background of promoting the open competition of disciplines by "double first-class".[Method/process] On the basis of reviewing the competitiveness of archival disciplines, this paper analyzes the highly cited papers in CSSCI source journals of archival science between 2012-2015 from the three aspects of subject, evolution and citation structure. Then, the paper depicts structure of archival disciplines and evaluates the overall competitiveness.[Result/conclusion] The research finds that the highly cited topics of archival science are concentrated in the field of archival work and discipline construction; the topics of archival theory, archival information security and information technology application are among the top three, but the overall scale is insufficient relatively. The above results show that the overall development of archival discipline is unbalanced, and the competitiveness of archival science mainly comes from the research of archival work, while the scale of the research on the new technological topics that have more competitive archival theory exploration and influence the development of the discipline is insufficient. In order to enhance the competitiveness of archives disciplines and increase the overall competitiveness of library, information and archives disciplines in the future, the archival discipline should implement overall division of disciplines, optimize the structure of disciplines, reconstruct the competitive advantages of core areas, and upgrade the theoretical level of archives based on the integration and opening strategy of disciplines.

Key words: archives, highly cited papers, subject structure, discipline competitiveness

中图分类号: