图书情报工作 ›› 2020, Vol. 64 ›› Issue (19): 3-14.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.19.001

• 理论研究 •    下一篇

中外图书馆联盟经费管理模式比较研究

李朝阳1,2, 冯琳3, 高波4   

  1. 1. 岭南师范学院图书馆 湛江 524048;
    2. 广东沿海经济带发展研究中心 湛江 524048;
    3. 珠海市第一中等职业学校 珠海 519000;
    4. 华南师范大学经济与管理学院 广州 510006
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-26 修回日期:2020-05-31 出版日期:2020-10-05 发布日期:2020-10-05
  • 作者简介:李朝阳(ORCID:0000-0001-9868-4794),馆员,硕士,E-mail:yangzi707@163.com;冯琳(ORCID:0000-0002-7524-0223),馆员,硕士;高波(ORCID:0000-0003-1575-0878),教授,博士。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家社会科学基金重点项目"中外图书馆联盟管理模式比较研究"(项目编号:14ATQ001)研究成果之一。

Comparative Study on Funds Management Models of Chinese and Foreign Library Consortia

Li Zhaoyang1,2, Feng Lin3, Gao Bo4   

  1. 1 Library of Lingnan Normal University, Zhanjiang 524048;
    2 Guangdong Coastal Economic Belt Development Research Center, Zhanjiang 524048;
    3 Zhuhai First Vocational School, Zhuhai 519000;
    4 School of Economic & Management of South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006
  • Received:2020-03-26 Revised:2020-05-31 Online:2020-10-05 Published:2020-10-05

摘要: [目的/意义] 比较中外图书馆联盟的经费管理模式,可以反映出我国图书馆联盟经费管理模式的优势和不足。[方法/过程] 从经费的战略管理、管理机构、报告制度、使用规范化、优先发展项、管理人员等方面对中外图书馆联盟进行比较分析。战略管理从战略目标及策略角度论述;管理机构从管理委员会、财务委员会、审计委员会等方面论述;报告制度从年度报告、审计报告、预算报告等方面论述;经费使用规范化从依据和流程方面论述;拓展经费策略从优先发展项论述;国外经费管理人员制度从财务员、审计员和协调员等方面论述。[结果/结论] 通过比较总结中外图书馆联盟经费管理各方面的异同,从中获得启示。

关键词: 资源共享, 图书馆联盟, 经费管理, 管理模式, 调查研究

Abstract: [Purpose/significance] Comparing the funds management models of Chinese and foreign library consortia, which can reflect the strengths and weaknesses of the funds management modes of library consortia in China. [Method/process] This paper analyzed and compared library consortia between China and foreign countries from the aspects of strategic management, management organization, reporting system, standardization of use, priority funding, and funds management personnel. Strategic management start with clear strategic goals and tactics; the management organization discussed from the management committee, finance committee, audit committee, etc.; the reporting system discussed from the annual report, audit report, budget report, etc.; the standardization of funds use discussed from the basis and process; the expansion of the funds strategy from the priority development items; The management personnel system discussed from the aspects of financial officer, auditor and coordinator. [Result/conclusion] By comparing and summarizing the similarities and differences of the funds management of Chinese and foreign library consortia, we can draw inspiration from them.

Key words: resource sharing, library consortia, funds management, management mode, investigation

中图分类号: