图书情报工作 ›› 2021, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (2): 65-74.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.02.007

• 工作研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

《科学数据管理办法》落实现状、影响因素及推进策略研究

李洋1, 温亮明2,3   

  1. 1. 成都体育学院图书馆 成都 610041;
    2. 中国科学院计算机网络信息中心 北京 100190;
    3. 中国科学院大学计算机科学与技术学院 北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-09 修回日期:2020-10-03 出版日期:2021-01-20 发布日期:2021-01-20
  • 通讯作者: 温亮明(ORCID:0000-0003-0284-1527),博士研究生,通讯作者,E-mail:wenliangming1990@163.com
  • 作者简介:李洋(ORCID:0000-0001-8231-9995),馆员,硕士。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家自然科学基金重大研究计划培育项目“面向管理和决策的大数据资源共享与治理机制”(项目编号:91546125)研究成果之一。

Research on the Implementation Status, Influencing Factors and Promotion Strategies of the “Scientific Data Management Rule”

Li Yang1, Wen Liangming2,3   

  1. 1. Library of Chengdu Sport University, Chengdu 610041;
    2. Computer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;
    3. School of Computer Science and Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049
  • Received:2020-07-09 Revised:2020-10-03 Online:2021-01-20 Published:2021-01-20
  • Supported by:
     

摘要: [目的/意义] 对《科学数据管理办法》出台以来的相关研究、落实情况及落实的影响因素等相关问题进行探讨,以期为《科学数据管理办法》的进一步落实提供参考与借鉴。[方法/过程] 首先,系统梳理《科学数据管理办法》的相关研究成果;然后,调研科学数据管理利益相关机构对《科学数据管理办法》的落实情况;其次,从积极和消极两个方面分析《科学数据管理办法》落实的影响因素;最后,提出《科学数据管理办法》落实的几点推进策略。[结果/结论] 研究发现,目前《科学数据管理办法》的落实推进以各级政府职能部门为主,总体落实情况尚不理想;推动《科学数据管理办法》落实的积极因素包括数据价值凸显、数据设施完善、国家高度重视、政府推进明显、相关研究丰富等,阻碍《科学数据管理办法》落实的消极因素包括利益相关者意识淡薄、相关机构管理失位、落实规划定位模糊、监督激励机制缺失、实践研究数量不足等。可以从提高认识加强实践研究、推动机制体制建设、提高利益相关者合作强度等方面推进《科学数据管理办法》的落实。

 

关键词: 《科学数据管理办法》, 利益相关者, 落实, 科学数据, 数据管理

Abstract: [Purpose/significance] This paper discusses the related research, implementation and influencing factors of the Scientific Data Management Rule since its promulgation, in order to provide reference for the further implementation of the Scientific Data Management Rule.[Method/process] Firstly, this paper systematically sorted out the relevant research on the Scientific Data Management Rule. Secondly, investigated the implementation of the Scientific Data Management Rule from the perspective of scientific data stakeholders. Thirdly, the positive and negative influencing factors for implementing the Scientific Data Management Rule were analyzed from various aspects. Finally, the paper put forward some strategies to promote the implementation of the Scientific Data Management Rule.[Result/conclusion] At present, the implementation of the Scientific Data Management Rule is mainly carried out by various government departments at all levels, but the overall implementation is not satisfactory. The positive factors of the implementation of the Scientific Data Management Rule are reflected in the following aspects:the value of data is highlighted, the data facilities are improved, the state attaches great importance to it, the government promotes obviously, and the related research is rich. The negative factors are reflected in the weak awareness of scientific data stakeholders, management of relevant institutions is out of order, implementation planning is ambiguous, lack of supervision and incentive mechanisms, and the practice research is insufficient. The implementation of the Scientific Data Management Rule can be promoted by improving existing research suggestions, strengthening the construction of mechanism and system, and improving the intensity of stakeholder cooperation.

Key words: Scientific Data Management Rule, stakeholders, implementation, scientific data, data management

中图分类号: