[1] ELIZABETH M. Advancing peer review at BMC[EB/OL].[2022-02-10]. https://www.biomedcentral.com/about/advancing-peer-review. [2] ULRICH P. Interactive journal concept for improved scientific publishing and quality assurance[J]. Learned publishing, 2004, 17(2):105-113. [3] 秦成磊,章成志.大数据环境下同行评议面临的问题与对策[J].情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(4):99-112. [4] ASAPBIO. Open letter on the publication of peer review reports[EB/OL].[2022-02-10]. https://asapbio.org/letter. [5] NATURE COMMUNICATION EDITORIAL. Transparent peer review at nature communications[J]. Nature communications, 2015,6(10277):1-2. [6] INGA V. Peer reviewers unmasked:largest global survey reveals trends[EB/OL].[2022-02-15]. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-06602-y. [7] PUBLONS. Global state of peer review[R/OL].[2022-02-15]. https://publons.com/community/gspr. [8] RITU D. Recognising the contribution of nature research journal referees[EB/OL].[2022-02-15]. http://blogs.nature.com/ofschemesandmemes/2019/04/16/recognising-the-contribution-of-nature-research-journal-referees. [9] 林崇德.心理学大辞典[M].上海:上海教育出版社, 2003. [10] ZHANG G Y, WANG L C, XIE W X, et al. "This article is interesting, however":exploring the language use in the peer review comment of articles published in the BMJ[J]. Aslib journal of information management, 2022, 74(3):399-416. [11] WANG K, WAN X. Sentiment analysis of peer review texts for scholarly papers[C]//The 41st international acm sigir conference on research&development in information retrieval. New York:Association for Computing Machinery, 2018:175-184. [12] GHOSAL T, VERMA R, EKBAL A, et al. DeepSentiPeer:harnessing sentiment in review texts to recommend peer review decisions[C]//Proceedings of the 57th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics. Stroudsburg:Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019:1120-1130. [13] BRAVO G, GRIMALDO F, LÓPEZ-I E, et al. The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals[J]. Nature communication, 2019, 322(10):1-8. [14] CHAKRABORTY S, GOYAL P, MUKHERJEE A. Aspect-based sentiment analysis of scientific reviews[C]//Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE joint conference on digital libraries in 2020. New York:Association for Computing Machinery, 2020:207-216. [15] BULJAN I, GARCIA-COSTA D, GRIMALDO F, et al. Large-scale language analysis of peer review reports[J]. Elife sciences, 2020, 9:e53249. [16] AUSLOOS M, NEDIC O, FRONCZAK A, et al. Quantifying the quality of peer reviewers through zipf's law[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 106(1):347-368. [17] RAMACHANDRAN L, GEHRINGER E, YADAV R. Automated assessment of the quality of peer reviews using natural language processing techniques[J]. International journal of artificial intelligence in education, 2017, 27:534-581. [18] LI J, SATO A, SHIMURA K, et al. Multi-task peer-review score prediction[C]//Proceedings of the first workshop on scholarly document processing. Stroudsburg:Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020:121-126. [19] 张琳, GUNNAR S.科学计量与同行评议相结合的科研评价——国际经验与启示[J].情报学报, 2020, 39(8):806-816. [20] LI S, ZHAO W, YIN E, et al. A neural citation count prediction model based on peer review text[C]//Proceedings of the 2019 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing and the 9th international joint conference on natural language processing. Stroudsburg:Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019:4916-4926. [21] ZONG Q, FAN L, XIE Y, et al. The relationship of polarity of post-publication peer review to citation count:evidence from publons[J]. Online information review, 2020,44(3):583-602. [22] ZONG Q, XIE Y, LIANG J. Does open peer review improve citation count?evidence from a propensity score matching analysis of PeerJ[J]. Scientometrics, 2020, 125(1):607-623. [23] HUA X, NIKOLOV M, BADUGU N, et al. Argument mining for understanding peer reviews[EB/OL].[2022-02-15]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.10104v1. [24] FROMM M, FAERMAN E, BERRENDORF M, et al. Argument mining driven analysis of peer-reviews[EB/OL].[2022-02-15]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.07743. [25] CHO K. Machine classification of peer comments in physics[C]//Proceedings of the 1st International conference on educational data mining. Montreal:International Educational Data Mining Society, 2008:192-196. [26] LIAO C, LI Y, CHENG H. Examining the effects of automatic comment classification on comment types in peer review for graduate students'academic writing[C]//Proceedings of the 8th international congress on advanced applied informatics. Piscataway:IEEE Computer Society, 2019:215-220. [27] GHOSAL T, KUMAR S, BHARTI P K, et al. Peer review analyze:a novel benchmark resource for computational analysis of peer reviews. Plos one, 2022, 17(1):e0259238. [28] BHANDARI M, BUSSE J, DEVEREAUX P J, et al. Factors associated with citation rates in the orthopedic literature[J]. Canadian journal of surgery, 2007, 50(2):119-123. [29] DIDEGAH F, BOWMAN T D, HOLMBERG K. On the differences between citations and altmetrics:an investigation of factors driving altmetrics versus citations for finnish articles[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Acience and Technology, 2018, 69(6):832-843. [30] 王嘉鑫.科学合作与学术影响力相关分析[D].大连:大连理工大学, 2019. [31] WEBSTER G D, JONASON P K, SCHEMBER T O, et al. Hot topics and popular papers in evolutionary psychology:analyses of title words and citation counts in evolution and human behavior[J]. Evolutionary psychology, 2009, 7(3):348-362. [32] VIEIRA E S, GOMES J A. Citations to scientific articles:its distribution and dependence on the article features[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2010, 4(1):1-13. [33] BOYACK K W, KLAVANS R. Predicting the importance of current papers[C]//Proceedings of the 10th international conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. Stockholm:Karolinska University Press, 2005, 1:335-342. [34] LANCHO-BARRANTES B S, GUERRERO-BOTE V P, MOYA-ANEGON F. What lies behind the averages and significance of citation indicators in different disciplines?[J]. Journal of information science, 2010, 36(3):371-382. [35] BORNMANN L, SCHIER H, MARX W, et al. What factors determine citation counts of publications in chemistry besides their quality?[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2012, 6(1):11-18. [36] 姜磊,林德明.参考文献对论文被引频次的影响研究[J].科研管理, 2015, 36(1):121-126. [37] 李力,刘德洪,张灿影.基于知识流动理论的科技论文学术影响力评价研究[J].情报科学, 2016, 34(7):113-119. [38] 赵蓉英,郭凤娇,谭洁.基于Altmetrics的学术论文影响力评价研究——以汉语言文学学科为例[J].中国图书馆学报, 2016, 42(1):96-108. [39] PETERS H P, VAN RAAN A F. On determinants of citation scores-a case study in chemical engineering[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1994, 45(1):39-49. [40] 牟象禹,龚凯乐,谢娟,等.论文被引频次的影响因素研究——以国内图书情报领域为例[J].图书情报知识, 2018(4):43-52. [41] LEIMU R, KORICHEVA J. What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers?[J]. Trends in ecology&evolution, 2005, 20(1):28-32. [42] VANCLAY J K. Factors affecting citation rates in environmental science[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2013, 7(2):265-271. [43] NI J, ZHAO Z, SHAO Y, et al. The influence of opening peer review on the citations of journal articles[J]. Scientometrics, 2021, 126(12):9393-9404. [44] BORNMANN L. The problem of citation impact assessments for recent publication years in institutional evaluations[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2013, 7(3):722-729. [45] CHAWLA D. In brief, papers with shorter titles get more citations, study suggests[EB/OL].[2021-10-30]. https://www.science.org/content/article/brief-papers-shorter-titles-get-more-citations-study-suggests. [46] HASLAM N, BAN L, KAUFMANN L, et al. What makes an article influential?Predicting impact in social and personality psychology[J]. Scientometrics, 2008, 76(1):169-185. [47] CHEN C. Predictive effects of structural variation on citation counts[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 2012, 63(3):431-449. [48] ZHAO D Z. Characteristics and impact of grant-funded research:a case study of the library and information science field[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 84(2):293-306. [49] ROSHANI S, BAGHERYLOOIEH M R, MOSLEH M, et al. What is the relationship between research funding and citation-based performance?a comparative analysis between critical disciplines[J]. Scientometrics, 2021, 126(9):7859-7874. [50] ANNALINGAM A, DAMAYANTHI H, JAYAWARDENA R, et al. Determinants of the citation rate of medical research publications from a developing country[J]. Springerplus, 2014, 3(1):1-6. [51] STREMERSCH S, CAMACHO N, VANNESTE S, et al. Unraveling scientific impact:citation types in marketing journals[J]. International journal of research in marketing, 2015, 32(1):64-77. [52] FU L D, ALIFERIS C F. Using content-based and bibliometric features for machine learning models to predict citation counts in the biomedical literature[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 85(1):257-270. [53] ZHANG X Y, XIE Q, SONG M. Measuring the impact of novelty, bibliometric, and academic-network factors on citation count using a neural network[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2021, 15(2):1-17. [54] MA C, LI Y, GUO F, et al. The citation trap:papers published at year-end receive systematically fewer citations[J]. Journal of economic behavior&organization, 2019, 166:667-687. [55] 伍军红,肖宏,任美亚,等. PCSI:一种单篇论文被引频次标准化方法[J].图书情报工作,2020,64(23):22-30. [56] DEVLIN J, CHANG M, LEE K, et al. BERT:pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding[EB/OL].[2021-07-15]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.04805. [57] BELTAGY Z, LO K, COHAN A. SciBert:pretrained language model for scientific text[EB/OL].[2021-07-15]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.10676. [58] QIN C, ZHANG C, BU Y. Exploring the distribution regularities of user attention and sentiment toward product aspects in online reviews[J]. The electronic library, 2021, 39(4):615-638. [59] 秦成磊,章成志.中文在线评论中的产品新属性识别研究[J].信息资源管理学报, 2020, 10(3):78-91. [60] LE Q, MIKOLOV T. Distributed representations of sentences and documents[EB/OL].[2021-07-15]. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1405.4053v2. [61] 周志华.机器学习[M].北京:清华大学出版社, 2016. [62] PARK E, KIM W. What are the drivers of citations?application in tourism and hospitality journals[J]. Applied sciences, 2021, 11(19):1-16. [63] DAUD A, AMJAD T, SIDDIQUI M A, et al. Correlational analysis of topic specificity and citations count of publication venues[J]. Library hi tech, 2019, 37(1):8-18. [64] KOCH L. An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers[J]. Biometrics, 1977, 33(2):363-374. [65] CHAWLA N, BOWYER K, HALL L, et al. Smote:synthetic minority over-sampling technique[J]. Journal of artificial intelligence research, 2002, 16(1):321-357. [66] QU Y, SHEN D, SHEN Y, et al. Coda:contrast-enhanced and diversity-promoting data augmentation for natural language understanding[EB/OL].[2021-07-15]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.08670. [67] 宗成庆,夏睿,张家俊.文本数据挖掘[M].北京:清华大学出版社, 2019. [68] CORTES C, LAWRENCE N D. Inconsistency in conference peer review:revisiting the 2014 neurips experiment[EB/OL].[2021-10-30]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.09774. [69] SILER K, LEE K, BERO L. Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2015, 112(2):360-365.作者贡献说明:秦成磊:提出研究思路与研究设计、数据采集与处理、数据标注、进行实验、论文撰写、论文修订;韩茹雪:数据标注;周昊旻:数据标注;仲江涛:数据标注;章成志:研究设计与研究思路讨论,论文修订。 |