[1] BATES M J. The invisible substrate of information science[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1999, 50(12), 1043-1050. [2] RIEH S Y, COLLINS-THOMPSON K, HANSEN P, et al. Towards searching as a learning process:a review of current perspectives and future directions[J]. Journal of information science, 2016, 42(1):19-34. [3] FISHER M, GODDU M K, KEIL F C. Searching for explanations:how the Internet inflates estimates of internal knowledge[J]. Journal of experimental psychology:general, 2015, 144(3):674-687. [4] SMITH C L, RIEH S Y. Knowledge-context in search systems:toward information-literate actions[C]//Proceedings of the 2019 conference on human information interaction and retrieval. New York:ACM, 2019:55-62. [5] RIEH S Y, GWIZDKA J, FREUND L, et al. Searching as learning:novel measures for information interaction research[J].Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 51(1):1-4. [6] SAWYER R K. The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2005. [7] HANSEN P, RIEH S Y. Recent advances on searching as learning:an introduction to the special issue[J]. Journal of information science, 2016, 42(1):3-6. [8] 奥姆罗德.学习心理学[M]. 汪玲,李燕平,廖凤林,等译.北京:中国人民大学出版社.2015. [9] VAKKARI P. Searching as learning:a systematization based on literature[J]. Journal of information science, 2016, 42(1):7-18. [10] O'BRIEN H L. Report from dagstuhl seminar (Vol. 17092):SAL - a information retrieval (IR)/interactive information retrieval (ⅡR) perspective[EB/OL].[2020-09-10]. https://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2017/7357/pdf/dagrep_v007_i002_p135_s17092.pdf. [11] GWIZDKA J, CHEN X. Towards observable indicators of learning on search[C]//Proceedings of SIGIR 2016 workshop:searching as learning (SAL). Italy:CEUR-WS,2016. [12] BELKIN N. Anomalous states of knowledge as a basis for information retrieval[J]. Canadian journal of information and library science, 1980, 5(1):133-143. [13] DERVIN B. An overview of sense-making research:concepts, methods and results to date[C]//Proceedings of international Communications Association annual meeting. Dallas, Texas, 1983:1-75. [14] BATES M J. The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface[J]. Online review, 1989, 13(5):407-424. [15] KUHLTHAU C C. Inside the search process:information seeking from the user's perspective[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1991, 42(5):361-371. [16] VAKKARI P, PENNANEN M. Sources, relevance and contributory information of documents in writing a research proposal:a longitudinal case study[J]. The new review of information behaviour research, 2001, 2(11):217-232. [17] VAKKARI P. Cognition and changes of search terms and tactics during task performance:a longitudinal case study[M]. Paris:Le centre de hautes etudes internationales d'informatique documentaire, 2000:894-907. [18] VAKKARI P, HAKALA N. Changes in relevance criteria and problem stages in task performance[J]. Journal of documentation, 2000, 56(5):540-562. [19] MARCHIONINI G. Exploratory search:from finding to understanding[J]. Communications of the ACM, 2006, 49(4):41-46. [20] JÄRVELIN K, VAKKARI P, ARVOLA P, et al. Task-based information interaction evaluation:the viewpoint of program theory[J]. ACM transactions on information systems, 2015, 33(1):1-30. [21] PIAGET J, COOK M. The origins of intelligence in children[M]. New York:International Universities Press, 1952. [22] RUMELHART D, NORMAN D. Accretion, tuning, and restructuring:modes of learning[J]. Semantic factors in cognition, 1976:37-53. [23] ZHANG P, SOERGEL D. Towards a comprehensive model of the cognitive process and mechanisms of individual sensemaking[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 65(9):1733-1756. [24] VAKKARI P. Information search processes in complex tasks[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 conference on human information interaction & retrieval. New York:ACM, 2018:1-11. [25] KRAIGER K, FORD J K, SALAS E. Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 1993, 78(2):311-328. [26] BHATTACHARYA N, GWIZDKA J. Relating eye-tracking measures with changes in knowledge on search tasks[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 ACM symposium on eye tracking research & applications. New York:ACM, 2018:1-5. [27] COLLINS-THOMPSON K, RIEH S Y, HAYNES C C, et al. Assessing learning outcomes in web search:a comparison of tasks and query strategies[C]//Proceedings of the 2016 conference on human information interaction and retrieval. New York:ACM, 2016:163-172. [28] 谭金波.学生信息搜索的内隐与外显策略对网络学习绩效的影响[J].中国电化教育,2014(9):67-71, 77. [29] GADIRAJU U, YU R, DIETZE S, et al. Analyzing knowledge gain of users in informational search sessions on the Web[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 conference on human information interaction & retrieval. New York:ACM, 2018:2-11. [30] YU R, GADIRAJU U, HOLTZ P, et al. Predicting user knowledge gain in informational search sessions[C]//The 41st international ACM SIGIR conference on research & development in information retrieval. New York:ACM, 2018:75-84. [31] LIU C, SONG X. How do information source selection strategies influence users' learning outcomes'[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 conference on human information interaction & retrieval. New York:ACM, 2018:257-260. [32] SONG X, LIU C, LIU H. Characterizing and exploring users' task completion process at different stages in learning related tasks[J]. Proceedings of the association for information science and technology, 2018, 55(1):460-469. [33] CHI Y, HAN S, HE D, et al. Exploring knowledge learning in collaborative information seeking process[C]//Proceedings of SIGIR 2016 workshop:searching as learning (SAL). Italy:CEUR-WS, 2016. [34] ROY N, MORAES F, HAUFF C. Exploring users' learning gains within search sessions[C]//Proceedings of the 2020 conference on human information interaction and retrieval. New York:ACM, 2020:432-436. [35] POTTHAST M, HAGEN M, VÖLSKE M, et al. Crowdsourcing interaction logs to understand text reuse from the Web[C]//Proceedings of the 51st annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Sofia:Association for Computational Linguistics, 2013:1212-1221. [36] HAGEN M, POTTHAST M, VÖLSKE M, et al. How writers search:analyzing the search and writing logs of non-fictional essays[C]//Proceedings of the 2016 conference on human information interaction and retrieval. New York:ACM, 2016:193-202. [37] 刘畅, 宋筱璇, 杨子傲. 用户信息搜索中的学习行为及过程探究[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2019, 37(4):36-45. [38] ZHANG P, SOERGEL D. Process patterns and conceptual changes in knowledge representations during information seeking and sensemaking:a qualitative user study[J]. Journal of information science, 2016, 42(1):59-78. [39] LIU H, LIU C, BELKIN N J. Investigation of users' knowledge change process in learning-related search tasks[J]. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2019, 56(1):166-175. [40] LIU C, SONG X, LIU H, et al. Modelling knowledge change behaviors in learning-related tasks[C]//Proceedings of CIKM 2020 workshop:1st international workshop on investigating learning during Web search. Ireland:CEUR-WS, 2020. [41] ZHANG Y, LIU C. Users' knowledge use and change during information searching process:a perspective of vocabulary usage[C]//Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE joint conference on digital libraries in 2020. New York:ACM, 2020:47-56. [42] COURTRIGHT C. Context in information behavior research[J]. Annual review of information science and technology, 2010, 41(1):273-306. [43] WILLOUGHBY T, ANDERSON S A, WOOD E, et al. Fast searching for information on the Internet to use in a learning context:the impact of domain knowledge[J]. Computers & Education, 2009, 52(3):640-648. [44] WILSON M J, WILSON M L. A comparison of techniques for measuring sensemaking and learning within participant-generated summaries[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 2013, 64(2):291-306. [45] 袁红,李秋.搜索任务和搜索能力对用户探索式搜索行为的影响研究[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(15):94-105. [46] KINLEY K, TJONDRONEGORO D. User-Web interactions:how wholistic/analytic Web users search the Web?[C]//Proceedings of the 22nd conference of the computer-human interaction special interest group of Australia on computer-human interaction. New York:ACM, 2010:344-347. [47] 刘涵蕊,刘畅.认知风格与话题熟悉度对学习型任务下搜索交互行为的影响研究[J].情报理论与实践,2018,41(4):56-62. [48] 张路路,黄崑.基于认知风格的数字图书馆用户信息检索行为研究[J].情报学报,2018,37(11):1164-1174. [49] ALLPORT G W. Personality:a psychological interpretation[J]. British journal of educational psychology, 1937, 13(7):48-50. [50] FLAVELL J H. Metacognitive aspects of problem solving[J].The nature of intelligence, 1976:231-235. [51] LIU G Z, CHONG S S. Metacognition & conceptual drifting in interactive information retrieval:an exploratory field study[J]. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 48(1):1-9. [52] BOWLER L. A taxonomy of adolescent metacognitive knowledge during the information search process[J]. Library & information science research, 2010, 32(1):27-42. [53] VAKKARI P. Task-based information searching[J]. Annual review of information science and technology, 2003, 37(1):413-464. [54] RUTHVEN I, KELLY D. Interactive information seeking, behaviour and retrieval[M]. London:Facet Publishing, 2011. [55] 宋筱璇,刘畅.学习型搜索中用户信息源选择和使用策略研究[J].情报学报,2019,38(6):655-666. [56] 宋筱璇,刘畅.搜索前后用户知识水平的评估及其变化情况分析[J].图书情报工作,2018,62(2):108-116. [57] ANDERSON L W, KRATHWOHL D R. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing:a revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives[M]. New York:Longman, 2001. [58] JANSEN B J, BOOTH D, SMITH B. Using the taxonomy of cognitive learning to model online searching[J]. Information processing & management, 2009, 45(6):643-663. [59] WU W C, KELLY D, EDWARDS A, et al. Grannies, tanning beds, tattoos and NASCAR:evaluation of search tasks with varying levels of cognitive complexity[C]//Proceedings of the 4th information interaction in context symposium. New York:ACM, 2012:254-257. [60] KELLY D, ARGUELLO J, EDWARDS A, et al. Development and evaluation of search tasks for ⅡR experiments using a cognitive complexity framework[C]//Proceedings of the 2015 international conference on the theory of information retrieval. New York:ACM, 2015:101-110. [61] GHOSH S, RATH M, SHAH C. Searching as learning:Exploring search behavior and learning outcomes in learning-related tasks[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 conference on human information interaction & retrieval. New York:ACM, 2018:22-31. [62] 韩正彪,郭靖怡,潘培培,等.基于认知分类的大学生网络健康信息搜索的学习效果研究[J].图书情报知识,2020(4):19-31. [63] URGO K, ARGUELLO J, CAPRA R. Anderson and Krathwohl's two-dimensional taxonomy applied to task creation and learning assessment[C]//Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGIR international conference on theory of information retrieval. New York:ACM, 2019:117-124. [64] KOROBILI S, MALLIARI A, ZAPOUNIDOU S. Factors that influence information-seeking behavior:the case of Greek graduate students[J]. Journal of academic librarianship, 2011, 37(2):155-165. [65] 袁红,施晓玲.搜索与学习:探索式搜索中的个体学习行为研究[J].情报理论与实践,2019,42(3):36-42. [66] LIU C, ZHANG L, SONG X. Are self-assessment of search ability and performance reliable?[J]. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016, 53(1):1-4. [67] HERSH W R, ELLIOT D L, HICKAM D H, et al. Towards new measures of information retrieval evaluation[C]//Proceedings of international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval. New York:ACM, 1995:164-170. [68] NELSON L, HELD C, PIROLLI P, et al. With a little help from my friends:examining the impact of social annotations in sensemaking tasks[C]//Proceedings of the 2009 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. New York:ACM, 2009:1795-1798. [69] KAMMERER Y, NAIRN R, PIROLLI P, et al. Signpost from the masses:learning effects in an exploratory social tag search browser[C]//Proceedings of the 2009 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. New York:ACM, 2009:625-634. [70] 夏立新,周鼎,叶光辉,等.情感负荷视角下探索式搜索学习效果的影响因素[J].图书情报知识,2020(4):133-141. [71] 张云秋, 安文秀, 冯佳. 探索式信息搜索行为研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2012, 56(14):67-72. [72] 刘萍,杨志伟,苏文婷.面向探索式搜索的认知结构量化评估[J].情报理论与实践,2019,42(5):99-105. [73] KOLB D A. Experiential learning:experience as the source of learning and development[M]. New York:FT Press, 2014. [74] INGWERSEN P, JÄRVELIN K. The turn:integration of information seeking and retrieval in context[M]. Netherlands:Springer, 2006. [75] EICKHOFF C, TEEVAN J, WHITE R, et al. Lessons from the journey:a query log analysis of within-session learning[C]//Proceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. New York:ACM, 2014:223-232. [76] WHITE R W, DUMAIS S T, TEEVAN J. Characterizing the influence of domain expertise on Web search behavior[C]//Proceedings of the second ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. New York:ACM, 2009:132-141. [77] ZHANG X, COLE M, BELKIN N. Predicting users' domain knowledge from search behaviors[C]//Proceedings of the 34th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval. New York:ACM, 2011:1225-1226. [78] MEYER A, HANSEN P, FOURIE I. Assessing the potential of third space to design a creative virtual academic space based on findings from information behavior[EB/OL].[2020-09-10]. http://informationr.net/ir/23-4/isic2018/isic1814.html. [79] TEIXEIRA C P, TIBAU M, SIQUEIRA S W M, et al. Reordering search results to support learning[C]//International symposium on emerging technologies for education. Cham:Springer, 2019:361-369. [80] FULANTELLI G, MARENZI I, AHMAD Q A I, et al. SaR-Web-A tool to support search as learning processes[C]//Proceedings of SIGIR 2016 workshop:searching as learning. Italy:CEUR-WS, 2016. [81] HUURDEMAN H C, WILSON M L, KAMPS J. Active and passive utility of search interface features in different information seeking task stages[C]//Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on conference on human information interaction and retrieval. New York:ACM, 2016:3-12. [82] NIU X, KELLY D. The use of query suggestions during information search[J]. Information processing & management, 2014, 50(1):218-234. [83] HUURDEMAN H C. Dynamic compositions:recombining search user interface features for supporting complex work tasks[C]//Proceedings of CHⅡR 2017 workshop on supporting complex search tasks. Norway:CEUR-WS, 2017:22-25. [84] COLLINS-THOMPSON K, BENNETT P N, WHITE R W, et al. Personalizing web search results by reading level[C]//Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on information and knowledge management. New York:ACM, 2011:403-412. [85] AZPIAZU I M, DRAGOVIC N, PERA M S, et al. Online searching and learning:YUM and other search tools for children and teachers[J]. Information retrieval journal, 2017, 20(5):524-545. [86] WILSON M L, YE C, TWIDALE M B, et al. Search literacy:learning to search to learn[C]//Proceedings of SIGIR 2016 workshop:searching as learning. Italy:CEUR-WS, 2016. |