[1] 韩宇,赵学文,李正风.基础研究创新概念辨析及对相关问题的思考[J].中国基础科学,2001(3):35-40.
[2] 胡英奎,罗敏,王秀玲.学术期刊编辑初审论文创新性的方法[J].编辑学报,2012(4):353-355.
[3] 盛杰.期刊编辑对科技论文创新性的把握[J].编辑学报,2011(3):215-217.
[4] 朱大明.科技期刊论文创新性鉴审的四个基本要素[J].科技管理研究,2011(9):199-201.
[5] 曹妍,朱瑞芳,韩世范.应用德尔菲法构建护理论文创新性评价指标体系[J].护理研究,2017(17):2101-2103.
[6] AMJAD T, DING Y, DAUD A, et al. Topic-based heterogeneous rank[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 104(1):1-22.
[7] HELLSTEN I, LAMBIOTTE R, SCHARNHORST A, et al. Self-citations, co-authorships and keywords: a new approach to scientists’ field mobility?[J].Scientometrics,2007,72(3):469-486.
[8] LEE J Y. Exploring a researcher’s personal research history through self-citation network and citation identity[J].Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management,2012,29(1):157-174.
[9] 魏瑞斌.基于自引网络和内容分析的学者研究主题挖掘[J].情报学报,2015,34(6):635-645.
[10] HUMMON N, DEREIAN P. Connectivity in a citation network: the development of DNA theory [J].Social networks, 1989, 11(1):39-63.
[11] GOFFMAN W. Mathematical approach to the spread of scientific ideas++the history of mast cell research[J]. Nature, 1966, 212(5061):449-452.
[12] JAHN M. Changes with growth of the scientific literature of two biomedical specialties[D].Philadephia: Drexel University, 1972.
[13] 诺伊,巴塔盖尔吉.蜘蛛:社会网络分析技术[M]. 林枫,译.北京:世界图书出版公司,2012:328-331.
[14] 韩毅,金碧辉.基于连通性的引文网络结构分析新视角:主路径分析[J].科学学研究,2012(11):1634-1640.
[15] 隗玲,方曙.引文网络主路径研究进展评述及展望[J].情报理论与实践,2016(9):128-133.
[16] 宋歌.学术创新的扩散过程研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2015(1):62-75.
[17] 韩毅,童迎,夏慧.领域演化结构识别的主路径方法与高被引论文方法对比研究[J].图书情报工作,2013,57(3):11-16.
[18] 祝清松,冷伏海.基于引文主路径文献共被引的主题演化分析[J].情报学报,2014,33(5):498-506.
[19] DENNIS A R, WIXOM B H, VANDENBERG R J. Understanding fit and appropriation effects in group support systems via meta-analysis[J]. MIS quarterly, 2001, 25(2):167-193.
[20] BROWN S A. Predicting collaboration technology use: integrating technology adoption and collaboration research[J]. Journal of management information systems, 2010, 27(2):9-54.
[21] DENNIS A R, FULLER R M, VALACICH J S. Media, tasks, and communication processes: a theory of media synchronicity[J]. MIS quarterly, 2008, 32(3):575-600.
[22] CRONIN B. Bibliometrics and beyond: some thoughts on Web-based citation analysis[J]. Journal of information science, 2001, 27(1):1-7.
[23] CRONIN B, SHAW D. Banking on different forms of symbolic capital[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 2010, 53(14):1267-1270.
[24] VAUGHAN L, SHAW D. Web citation data for impact assessment: a comparison of four science disciplines[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 2005, 56(10):1075-1087.
[25] 邱均平,余厚强.替代计量学的提出过程与研究进展[J].图书情报工作,2013,57(19):5-12.
[26] LARIVIERE V, GINGRAS Y, SUGIMOTO C R, et al. Team size matters: collaboration and scientific impact since 1900[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology,2015,66(7):1323-1332.
[27] PRATT J A, HAUSER K, SUGIMOTO C R. Defining the intellectual structure of information systems and related college of business disciplines: a bibliometric analysis[J]. Scientometrics,2012,93(2):279-304.
[28] SUGIMOTO C R, CRONIN B. Biobibliometric profiling: an examination of multifaceted approaches to scholarship[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 2014,63(3):450-468.
[29] SUGIMOTO C R, SUGIMOTO T J, TSOU A, et al. Age stratification and cohort effects in scholarly communication: a study of social sciences[J]. Scientometrics, 2016,109(2):997-1016.
[30] CRONIN B. Bibliometrics and beyond: some thoughts on Web-based citation analysis[J]. Journal of information science,2001,27(1):1-7. |