图书情报工作 ›› 2018, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (16): 132-143.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.16.015

• 综述述评 • 上一篇    下一篇

学术期刊影响力评价方法研究进展

张慧玲1,2, 董坤2,3, 许海云2,4   

  1. 1. 山西财经大学 太原 030006;
    2. 中国科学院成都文献情报中心 成都 610041;
    3. 中国科学院大学 北京 100190;
    4. 中国科学技术信息研究所 北京 100038
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-19 修回日期:2018-04-08 出版日期:2018-08-20 发布日期:2018-08-20
  • 通讯作者: 许海云(ORCID:0000-0002-7453-3331),副研究员,博士,通讯作者,E-mail:xuhy@clas.ac.cn。
  • 作者简介:张慧玲(ORCID:0000-0001-5155-6357),硕士研究生;董坤(ORCID:0000-0001-8455-9204),博士研究生。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家自然科学基金项目"科学-技术主题关联分析的创新演化路径识别方法研究"(项目编号:71704170)、中科院成都文献情报中心主任基金(项目编号:Y7Z0581002)和中国科学院青年创新促进会(项目编号:2016159)研究成果之一。

Research on Evaluation Methods of Academic Journals Impact

Zhang Huiling1,2, Dong Kun2,3, Xu Haiyun2,4   

  1. 1. School of Information Management, Shanxi University of Finance & Economics, Taiyuan 030006;
    2. Chengdu Documentation and Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041;
    3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;
    4. Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China(ISTIC), Beijing 100038
  • Received:2017-12-19 Revised:2018-04-08 Online:2018-08-20 Published:2018-08-20

摘要: [目的/意义]期刊影响力评价是科学计量学研究的重要组成部分和应用领域,对于优化期刊质量、促进科学交流具有重要意义。[方法/过程]综述国内外期刊影响力评价方法研究进展,从传统指标、影响因子系列评价指标、H指数以及衍生指标、类PageRank及其衍生指标、基于多因素综合评价方法、基于社交媒体的期刊影响力评价指标以及跨学科期刊评价方法出发,总结现有学术期刊影响力评价方法的特征及其不足之处。[结果/结论]现有评价指标融合度较差,较少考虑引文偏态与自引问题,且新兴的基于社交媒体的评价方法可行性有待商榷。未来应重视深度融合评价指标,引文偏态改进方法多样化,社交媒体期刊评价方法规范化以及跨领域期刊评价方法体系化。

关键词: 期刊影响力, 期刊评价, 评价指标, 学术期刊评价

Abstract: [Purpose/significance]Periodicals' influence evaluation is an important part and application field of scientific metrology research, which is of great significance for optimizing journal quality and promoting scientific exchange.[Method/process]This review summarizes the research progress of influencing evaluation methods of journals at home and abroad. In terms of traditional indicators, the series of influencing factors, index H and derivative indices, PageRank and its derivative indicators, the method of comprehensive evaluation based on multiple factors and the impact of periodicals based on social media, interdisciplinary journal evaluation methods, the characteristics and deficiencies of current evaluation methods are pointed out.[Result/conclusion]The paper finds that the existing evaluation indexes are poorly integrated. The citation skewness and self-citation problems are less considered, and the feasibility of emerging social media-based evaluation methods needs to be discussed. In the future we should pay attention to the in-depth integration of evaluation indicators, the diversification of citations for biased improvement methods, the standardization of evaluation methods for social media journals, and the systematization of cross-disciplinary journal evaluation methods.

Key words: journal influence, periodical evaluation, evaluation index, academic journal evaluation

中图分类号: