[1] NISO. NISO rp-25-2016 outputs of the NISO alternative assessment metrics project[EB/OL].[2019-01-10].https://groups.niso.org/apps/group_public/download.php/17091/NISO%20RP-25-2016%20Outputs%20of%20the%20NISO%20Alternative%20Assessment%20Project.pdf.
[2] TARABORELLI D. Soft peer review:social software and distributed scientific evaluation[EB/OL].[2019-02-10].http://nitens.org/docs/spr_coop08.pdf.
[3] NEYLON C,WU S. Article-level metrics and the evolution of scientific impact[J]. PLoS biology, 2009, 7(11):e1000242.
[4] FINBAR G, SHARON D. Altmetrics:rethinking the way we measure[J]. Serials review, 2013, 39(1):56-61.
[5] JENSEN M. The new metrics of scholarly authority[J]. Chronicle of higher education, 2007, 53(41):1.
[6] PATTERSON M. Article-level metrics at PLoS addition of usage data[EB/OL].[2019-01-04].https://blogs.plos.org/plos/2009/09/article-level-metrics-at-plos-addition-of-usage-data/.
[7] PRIEM J, HEMMINGER B M. Scientometrics 2.0:toward new metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web[J]. First monday, 2010, 15(7):379-382.
[8] HAUSTEIN S,PETER I,SUGIMOTO C R,et al.Tweeting biomedicine:an analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 2014, 65(4):656-669.
[9] SHUAI X, PEPE A,BOLLEN J.How the scientific community reacts to newly submitted preprints:article downloads, Twitter mentions, and citations[EB/OL].[2019-02-08]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1202.2461v1.
[10] LI X M,THELWALL M,GIUSTINI D. Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement[J]. Scientometrics, 2012, 91(2):461-471.
[11] BAR-ILAN J. JASIST 2001-2010[J]. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 2012, 38(6):24-28.
[12] PRIEM J, PIWOWAR H A, HEMMINGER B M.Altmetrics in the wild:using social media to explore scholarly impact[EB/OL].[2019-01-08].https://arxiv.org/abs/1203.4745.
[13] ZAHEDI Z,COSTAS R,WOUTERS P.How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 101(2):1491-1513.
[14] BORNMANN L. What do altmetrics counts mean? A plea for content analyses[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016, 67(4):1016-1017.
[15] THWLWALL M, TSOU A, WEINGART S, et al.Tweeting links to academic articles[J].Cybermetrics,2013,17(1):1-8.
[16] PRIEM J,TARABORELLI D,Groth P,et al. Altmetrics:a manifesto[EB/OL].[2019-01-12]. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/.
[17] Tracking scholarly impact on the social Web:an altmetrics workshop[EB/OL].[2019-01-02]. https://blog.mendeley.com/2011/03/22/tracking-scholarly-impact-on-the-social-web-an-altmetrics-workshop/.
[18] 刘春丽. Altmetrics工具的发展、现况及相关问题[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016,60(5):87-92,117.
[19] PROCTER R,WILLIAMS R,STEWART J,et al. Adoption and use of Web 2.0 in scholarly communications[J]. Philosophical transactions of the royal society A:mathematical, physical and engineering sciences, 2010, 368(1926):4039-4056.
[20] LIU J, ADIE E. Five challenges in altmetrics:a toolmaker's perspective[J]. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 39(4):31-34.
[21] MIKE T,STEFANIE H, VINCENT L, et al. Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social Web services[J]. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8(5):e64841.
[22] CHEUNG M K. Altmetrics:too soon for use in assessment[J]. Nature, 2013, 494(7436):176.
[23] NISO.Alternative metrics initiative phase 1 white paper[EB/OL].[2019-01-10]. https://docplayer.net/4271006-Alternative-metrics-initiative-phase-1-white-paper.html.
[24] 余厚强,任全娥,张洋,等. Altmetrics的译名分歧:困扰、影响及其辨析[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2019, 45(1):49-61.
[25] NISO.Scholarly outputs[EB/OL].[2019-01-09]. https://sites.google.com/a/niso.org/scholarlyoutputs/.
[26] KRATZ J E, STRASSER C. Researcher Perspectives on Publication and Peer Review of Data[J]. Plos One, 2015, 10(2):e0117619.
[27] FORCE11.Joint declaration of data citation principles-final[EB/OL].[2019-04-09]. https://www.force11.org/datacitationprinciples.
[28] COUNTER.Counting online usage of networked electronic resources[EB/OL].[2017-01-14]. https://www.projectcounter.org/.
[29] KRATZ J E, STRASSER C. Making data count[J]. Scientific data, 2015(2):150039.
[30] HAAK L L, MEADOWS A, BROWN J. Using orcid, doi, and other open identifiers in research evaluation[J]. Frontiers in research,metrics and analytics, 2018, 3:1-7.
[31] 刘晓娟,赵卓婧,韦娱.生命周期视角下的Altmetrics数据质量研究[J].图书情报知识,2019(2):4,12-18.
[32] CROSSREF.Altmetrics-crossref[EB/OL].[2019-04-29].https://www.crossref.org/categories/altmetrics/.
[33] NISO.Advancing altmetrics:best practices and emerging ideas[EB/OL].[2019-04-29]. https://www.niso.org/events/2017/12/advancing-altmetrics-best-practices-and-emerging-ideas.
[34] NISO.Metrics case studies[EB/OL].[2019-04-29]. https://www.niso.org/events/2017/12/metrics-case-studies-training-thursday.
[35] ALTMETRIC.COM.Altmetric reveals most-mentioned articles of 2017[EB/OL].[2019-04-19]. https://www.altmetric.com/top100/2017/.
[36] ALTMETRIC.COM.Altmetric reveals most-mentioned articles of 2018[EB/OL].[2019-08-19]. https://www.altmetric.com/top100/2018/.
[37] Journal of Altmetrics[EB/OL].[2019-08-20].https://www.journalofaltmetrics.org.
[38] 邱均平,余厚强.替代计量学的提出过程与研究进展[J]. 图书情报工作,2013, 57(19):5-12.
[39] 刘春丽. Altmetrics工具的发展、现况及相关问题[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016,50(5):87-92.
[40] 刘恩涛, 李国俊, 邱小花,等. Altmetrics工具比较研究[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2015(8):85-92.
[41] 王睿, 胡文静, 郭玮. 常用Altmetrics工具比较[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2014(12):18-26.
[42] 由庆斌, 韦博, 汤珊红. 基于补充计量学的论文影响力评价模型构建[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(22):5-11.
[43] 王贤文, 刘趁, 毛文莉. 数字出版时代的科学论文综合评价研究[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2014, 25(11):1391-1396.
[44] 杨柳, 陈贡. Altmetrics视角下科研机构影响力评价指标的相关性研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015, 59(15):106-114.
[45] 王聪,刘春丽. Altmetrics在我国高校机构知识库应用分析[J]. 情报杂志, 2016, 35(12):116-120.
[46] 刘春丽. Altmetrics工具与机构知识库的整合与效果——以PlumX为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015, 59(24):39-46.
[47] 赵蓉英, 郭凤娇, 谭洁. 基于Altmetrics的学术论文影响力评价研究——以汉语言文学学科为例[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2016, 42(1):96-108.
[48] 赵蓉英, 魏明坤, 汪少震. 基于Altmetrics的开源软件学术影响力评价研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2017, 43(2):80-95.
[49] 赵蓉英, 郭凤娇. Altmetrics:学术影响力评价的新视角[J]. 情报科学, 2017(1):16-20.
[50] 王鹏飞,刘烜贞. 基于内容分析的Altmetrics本质研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017(2):115-120.
[51] 杨柳, 丁楠, 田稷. Altmetrics视角下机构知识库学者影响力评价研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2017, 40(6):104-110.
[52] 郭颖,肖仙桃. 国内学者影响力评价Altmetrics指标研究[J]. 情报理论与实践,2019,42(4):64-70.
[53] 曹丽江. 基于Altmetrics的学者影响力综合评价研究[D]. 苏州:苏州大学,2017.
[54] 邹丹.融合传统指标与Altmetrics指标的学者影响评估研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2018.
[55] 余厚强, 曹雪婷. 替代计量数据质量评估体系构建研究[J]. 图书情报知识, 2019, 188(2):21-29,52.
[56] 许健. 基于Altmetrics的高校图书馆服务能力评价指标体系构建研究[D]. 南昌:南昌大学,2018.
[57] 中国科协.四部门联合印发《关于深化改革培育世界一流科技期刊的意见》[EB/OL].[2019-08-19].http://www.xinhuanet.com/science/2019-08/19/c_138320888.htm.
[58] 匡登辉. 从Altmetrics热点论文看科技期刊影响力——以Altmetric.com Top 100论文为例[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2016, 27(11):1188-1194.
[59] 新媒体联盟. 新媒体联盟地平线报告(2015图书馆版)[J]. 开放学习研究, 2015(5):39-49.
[60] 国务院办公厅.国务院办公厅关于印发科学数据管理办法的通知[EB/OL].[2019-02-17]. http://www.most.gov.cn/mostinfo/xinxifenlei/fgzc/gfxwj/gfxwj2018/201804/t20180404_139023.htm.
[61] 中国科学院.中国科学院科学数据管理与开放共享办法[EB/OL].[2019-02-20]. http://www.cas.cn/tz/201902/t20190220_4679797.shtml. |