高校专利技术转移转化价值影响因素实证分析——基于11所一流高校专利转移转化数据

doi:10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.09.011

图书情报工作 ›› 2022, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (9): 103-116.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.09.011

高校专利技术转移转化价值影响因素实证分析——基于11所一流高校专利转移转化数据

魏太琛^1,2, 刘敏榕^1,2, 陈振标^1,2

1. 福州大学国家高校知识产权信息服务中心, 福州 350108;
2. 福州大学图书馆, 福州 350108

收稿日期:2021-11-10 修回日期:2022-01-14 出版日期:2022-05-05 发布日期:2022-05-12
作者简介:魏太琛,馆员,硕士,E-mail:taichenwei@163.com;刘敏榕,馆长,研究馆员,硕士生导师;陈振标,副研究馆员,硕士。
基金资助:
本文系教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目"高校图书馆创客空间知识服务模式与实证研究"(项目编号:18YJA870007)和福建省中青年教师教育科研项目"专利价值导向的高校专利信息服务体系建设"(项目编号:JAS180020)研究成果之一。

An Empirical Study on Influencing Factors of the Value of University Patent Technology Transfer and Transformation:Based on the Patent Transfer and Transformation Data from 11 First-Class Universities

Wei Taichen^1,2, Liu Minrong^1,2, Chen Zhenbiao^1,2

1. National Intellectual Property Information Service Center, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108;
2. Fuzhou University Library, Fuzhou 350108

Received:2021-11-10 Revised:2022-01-14 Online:2022-05-05 Published:2022-05-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的/意义]对高校专利技术转移转化价值的影响因素进行实证研究，帮助技术转移人员对专利技术转移转化价值形成更加客观的认识，提高专利交易效率，促进高校专利技术成果转移转化。[方法/过程]以我国11所一流高校专利转移转化数据为研究对象，从法律、技术、市场、转移转化方式四个层面设计解释变量，通过多元线性回归研究高校专利技术转移转化价值影响因素。[结果/结论]转移转化方式这一因素对高校专利转移价值的影响程度要显著强于技术、市场和法律因素;同族专利数、发明人数、文献页数对高校专利技术转移转化价值有显著正向影响，申请人数对高校专利技术转移转化价值有显著负向影响，且这四个变量回归系数显著性不受市场、转移转化方式因素的影响，是评价高校专利技术转移转化价值较为稳定的指标;不同转移转化类型、不同定价形式、不同组合交易方式的专利，其转移转化金额的影响因素差异较大;从法律、技术、市场、转移转化方式四个层面对高校专利转移技术转化价值进行评价的可靠程度在逐年提升。

关键词: 专利技术转移转化价值, 专利价值, 影响因素, 实证分析

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] This paper conducts an empirical study on the influencing factors of the value of university patent technology transfer and transformation, which can help technology transfer personnel to form a more objective understanding of the patent technology transfer and transformation value, improve transaction efficiency of patents, and promote transfer and transformation of patent technology achievements of universities. [Method/Process] Based on the patent transfer and transformation data from 11 first-class universities in China, this study designed explanatory variables from four levels of law, technology, market and form of transfer and transformation, and used multiple linear regression to study the influencing factors of the value of university patent technology transfer and transformation. [Result/Conclusion] The effect of the transfer and transformation mode on value of university patent transfer and transformation is significantly stronger than the factors of technology, market and law. The number of homologous patents, inventors and document pages have a significantly positive impact on the value of university patent technology transfer and transformation, but the number of applicants has a significantly negative impact on the value of university patent technology transfer and transformation. And the significance of the regression coefficients of these four variables is not affected by the factors of market and transfer and transformation mode, which is a more stable indicator to evaluate the value of transfer and transformation of university patent technology. For patents with different transfer and transformation types, pricing forms and combination trading methods, the influencing factors of the conversion amount are quite different. The reliability of evaluating the value of university patent technology transfer and transformation from the four levels of law, technology, market and form of transfer and transformation is increasing year by year.

Key words: value of patent technology transfer and transformation, patent value, influencing factors, empirical analysis

中图分类号:

G253

魏太琛, 刘敏榕, 陈振标. 高校专利技术转移转化价值影响因素实证分析——基于11所一流高校专利转移转化数据[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(9): 103-116.

Wei Taichen, Liu Minrong, Chen Zhenbiao. An Empirical Study on Influencing Factors of the Value of University Patent Technology Transfer and Transformation:Based on the Patent Transfer and Transformation Data from 11 First-Class Universities[J]. Library and Information Service, 2022, 66(9): 103-116.

参考文献

[1] 国家知识产权局知识产权发展研究中心.2020年中国专利调查报告[EB/OL].[2021-10-25].https://www.cnipa.gov.cn/art/2021/4/28/art_88_158969.
[2] 中华人民共和国中央人民政府.中共中央国务院印发《知识产权强国建设纲要(2021-2035年)》[EB/OL].[2021-10-25]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2021-09/22/content_5638714.
[3] FRANCIS N, KIMBERLY S H, DOMINIC O. The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science[J].Research policy,1997,26(3):317-330.
[4] TRAJTENBERG M. A penny for your quotes:patent citations and the value of innovations[J].The rand journal of economics,1990,21(1):172-187.
[5] ALBERT M B, AVERY D, FRANCIS N, et al. Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents[J].Research policy,1991,20(3):251-259.
[6] LANJOUW J, SCHANKERMAN M. Characteristics of patent litigation:a window on competition[J].The RAND journal of economics,2001,32(1):129-151.
[7] DOMINIQUE G. Applications, grants and the value of patent[J].Economics letters,2000,69(1):109-114.
[8] LANJOUW J O. Patent protection in the shadow of infringement:Simulation estimations of patent value[J].Review of economic studies,1998,65(4):671-710.
[9] MARKUS R. Improving patent valuations for management purposes&mdash:validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales[J].Research policy,2004,33(6):939-957.
[10] JAMES B. The value of U.S. patents by owner and patent characteristics[J].Research policy,2008,37(5):932-945.
[11] 乔永忠.基于专利情报视角的专利维持时间影响因素分析[J].图书情报工作,2009,53(4):42-45.
[12] 吴红,付秀颖,董坤.专利维持时间影响因素实证分析——以燃料电池专利文献为例[J].图书情报工作,2013,57(24):112-116,100.
[13] 宋爽.中国专利维持时间影响因素研究——基于专利质量的考量[J].图书情报工作,2013,57(7):96-100,105.
[14] FISCHER T, LEIDINGER J. Testing patent value indicators on directly observed patent value-An empirical analysis of Ocean Tomo patent auctions[J].Research policy,2014,43(3):519-529.
[15] 张克群,魏晓辉,郝娟等.基于社会网络分析方法的专利价值影响因素研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2016,37(5):67-74.
[16] 刘凯,徐仁胜.专利刺激政策的运行机制及其对专利质量的影响——基于1995-2015年省级面板数据的实证分析[J].科技管理研究,2017,37(13):167-173.
[17] 李冬梅,蒋仁爱,晏瑜.ICT领域专利发明人合作对中国专利质量的影响研究[J].情报杂志,2020,39(3):63-70.
[18] 周雷.专利发明人对专利价值的影响研究——以中国科学院2018年3月专利拍卖为例[J].文献与数据学报,2020,2(4):70-83.
[19] 钱坤,张晓,黄忠全.交易情景下专利价值影响因素分析[J].科学学研究,2020,38(9):1608-1620.
[20] OG J Y A, PAWELEC K B, KIM B, et al. Measuring patent value indicators with patent renewal information[J].Journal of open innovation:technology, market, and complexity,2020,6(1):16-27.
[21] CHANG K C, LI Y L, ZHANG T, et al.Threshold effects of the network structure in the relationship between patent pagerank and patent value[J].IEEE access,2020,8:19679-19684.
[22] 冯仁涛,余翔.专利技术范围与专利价值——基于生物技术领域专利的分析[J].情报杂志,2021,40(4):109-118.
[23] 李黎明,张敏,李小娟.引证网络专利质量对专利拍卖经济价值的影响效应研究[J].情报杂志, 2021,40(10):115-121.
[24] 李曦.专利技术转让合同中专利技术交易金额与专利要素之间的相关性研究[J].中国发明与专利,2021,18(5):38-45.
[25] ALLISON J R, LEMLEY M A, WALKER J. Extreme value or trolls on top? the characteristics of the most litigated patents[J].University of Pennsylvania law review,2009,158(1):101-137.
[26] 中华人民共和国科学技术部. 中华人民共和国促进科技成果转化法(2015年修订)[EB/OL].[2021-10-12]. http://www.most.gov.cn/xxgk/xinxifenlei/fdzdgknr/fgzc/flfg/201512/t20151204_122621.
[27] 万小丽,朱雪忠.专利价值的评估指标体系及模糊综合评价[J].科研管理,2008,29(2):185-191.
[28] HIKKEROVA L, KAMMOUN N, LANTZ J S.Patent life cycle:New evidence[J].Technological forecasting and social change,2014,88(10):313-324.
[29] SAPSALIS E, RAN N. Academic versus industry patenting:an in-depth analysis of what determines patent value[J].Research policy,2006,35(10):1631-1645.
[30] 乔永忠,肖冰.基于权利要求数的专利维持时间影响因素研究[J].科学学研究,2016,34(5):678-683.
[31] FRANCOIS P, WALTER G, CAN P. Patent family size and composition signal patent value?[J].Applied economics,2019,51(60):6476-6496.
[32] BESSEN J. Estimates of patent rents from firm market value[J].Research policy,2009,38(10):1604-1616.
[33] MARCO A C, SARNOFF J D, CHARLES A W. Patent claims and patent scope[J].Research policy,2019,48(9):103790-103799.
[34] 陈海秋,韩立岩.专利质量表征及其有效性:中国机械工具类专利案例研究[J].科研管理,2013,34(5):93-101.
[35] 施晴,王芸,徐宏等.基于专利转化的高校生物医药专利质量评价研究[J].科技管理研究,2019,39(11):139-145.
[36] CREMERS K, SCHLIESSLER P. Settlement during patent litigation trials-new evidence for Germany[A].6th annual conference of the EPIP association:rnFine-Tuning IPR debates[C],2011.
[37] 孙玉涛,栾倩.专利质量测度"三阶段-两维度"模型及实证研究——以C9联盟高校为例[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2016,37(6):23-32.
[38] ABRAMS D S, AKCIGIT U, POPADAK J. Patent value and citations:creative destruction or strategic disruption[J]. National bureau of economic research,2013,35(9):13-23.
[39] GAY C, LE B C.Uses without too many abuses of patent citations or the simple economics of patent citations as a measure of value and flows of knowledge[J].Economics of innovation and new technology,2005,14(5):333-338.
[40] IVAN D N,LUIGI O,FIORENZA B. The role of collaborative networks in supporting the innovation performances of lagging-behind European regions[J].Research policy,2018,47(1):1-13.
[41] KATZ J S, MARTIN B R. What is research collaboration?[J].Research policy,1997,26(1):1-18.
[42] MININ A D, FAEMS D. Building appropriation advantage:an introduction to the special issue on intellectual property management[J]. California management review,2013,55(4):7-14.
[43] 张俊艳,赵薇,雷玲.合作创新能否提升专利质量?——基于PSM与回归分析的实证研究[J].天津大学学报(社会科学版),2020,22(3):246-253.
[44] ZEEBROECK N, POTTELSBERGHE B, DOMINIQUE G. Claiming more:the increased voluminosity of patent applications and its determinants[J].Research policy,2009,38(6):1006-1020.
[45] Deng Y.Private value of European patents[J]. European economic review,2007,51(4),1785-1812.
[46] 马碧玉.论专利权交易——兼谈高等院校、科研机构科技成果转化方式的选择[J].电子知识产权,2016,26(8):8-16.
[47] 潘颖,卢章平.基于商业方法专利构建企业技术战略的研究[J].科技管理研究,2012,32(24):189-193,198.
[48] 王鑫.专利组合的经济性评价[J].青岛职业技术学院学报,2018,31(3):60-65.
[49] 万小丽,朱雪忠.专利价值的评估指标体系及模糊综合评价[J].科研管理,2008,29(2):185-191.

高校专利技术转移转化价值影响因素实证分析——基于11所一流高校专利转移转化数据

An Empirical Study on Influencing Factors of the Value of University Patent Technology Transfer and Transformation:Based on the Patent Transfer and Transformation Data from 11 First-Class Universities

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	袁红, 王焘. 政府数据开放可持续发展关键影响因素识别与作用机理分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(9): 53-65.
[2]	胡媛, 陈国东, 姚晓杰, 谢守美. 科研数据管理服务影响因素互作用框架元综合研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(8): 122-133.
[3]	黄崑, 郑明煊, 罗士超, 靳健. 探索式搜索中基于面部表情识别的用户情绪及影响因素研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(5): 93-104.
[4]	廖青云, 李玲, 路璐, 费鹏飞, 邹沐宏. 信息素养教育直播培训的学员专注度影响因素实证研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(3): 65-71.
[5]	翟运开, 张倩, 赵栋祥. 疫情防控常态化下患者双渠道就诊满意度影响因素研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(3): 118-129.
[6]	宋小康, 赵宇翔, 朱庆华. 在线健康信息替代搜寻影响因素研究：基于健康信念模型和社会支持理论[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(2): 45-56.
[7]	金燕, 刘琦, 毕崇武. 研究生学术搜索中的信息规避行为与成因研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(18): 84-94.
[8]	李月琳, 张泰瑞, 李嗣婕. 基于系统性综述的政府信息公开影响因素及实践赋能[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(18): 114-125.
[9]	叶莎莎, 杜婉鹏, 杜杏叶. 信息茧房视域下移动知识服务使用影响因素研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(16): 117-124.
[10]	范春竹, 邓小昭, 韩毅. 社交媒体用户消极使用行为：多源数据融合视角[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(15): 76-85.
[11]	刘妍. 专利价值评估研究综述与趋势展望[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(15): 127-139.
[12]	陈苗苗, 安璐. 突发传染病情境下社会化问答平台用户角色形成及转变——以知乎平台为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(12): 68-81.
[13]	贾明霞, 徐跃权, 赵宇翔. 大学生数字囤积行为的探索性研究——基于个人信息管理视角[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(10): 74-88.
[14]	孙海霞. 国外健康信息规避行为研究综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(9): 138-150.
[15]	张艳丰, 刘亚丽, 邹凯. 突发公共卫生事件社交媒体用户健康信息焦虑影响因素识别研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(8): 65-73.