国外语义搜索引擎调查与分析

doi:10.7536/j.issn.0252-3116.2013.23.020

图书情报工作 ›› 2013, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (23): 121-129.DOI: 10.7536/j.issn.0252-3116.2013.23.020

国外语义搜索引擎调查与分析

郭卫宁^1.2, 司莉¹

1. 中南民族大学图书馆馆员;
2. 武汉大学信息管理学院

收稿日期:2013-10-14 修回日期:2013-11-11 出版日期:2013-12-05 发布日期:2013-12-05
通讯作者: 司莉，武汉大学信息管理学院教授，博士，博士生导师，E-mail：lsiwhu@163.com。
作者简介:郭卫宁，中南民族大学图书馆馆员，武汉大学信息管理学院博士研究生
基金资助:
本文系中南民族大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目“基于Web3.0的图书馆知识服务研究”（项目编号：CSQ10005）研究成果之一。

Investigation and Analysis on Semantic Search Engines Abroad

Guo Weining^1.2, Si Li¹

1. School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072;
2. Library of South-Central University of Nationalities, Wuhan 430074

Received:2013-10-14 Revised:2013-11-11 Online:2013-12-05 Published:2013-12-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 收集Hakia、SenseBot、Swoogle、Kngine等13种国外典型的语义搜索引擎，以用户体验为视角，通过网站访问与实例测试，对其功能定位、检索范围和检索方法，尤其是语义搜索技术、结果呈现方式等进行深入调查与分析。研究表明，与传统搜索引擎链接清单相比，语义搜索引擎可为查询提供更加精准与直接的答案，能为用户提供更智能化、人性化、知识化的服务。最后对语义搜索引擎存在的问题、局限性和发展趋势进行讨论与展望。

关键词: 语义搜索引擎, 信息检索, 知识组织, 语义网

Abstract: 13 typical semantic search engines abroad, such as Hakia, SenseBot, Swoogle, Kngine etc. are collected. Through sites visiting and practical examples, the function position,search area,retrieval mode, especially search technique meaning-based and the display modes of results are investigated and deeply analyzed from the user perspective. The results indicate that, in contrast to a list of links, semantic search engines can provide accurate and direct answer for search queries, and offer more humanized, intelligent knowledge-based service to users. At last, the problems and limitations are discussed, the growing trends are presented.

Key words: semantic search engine, information retrieval, knowledge organization, semantic web

中图分类号:

G354.4

郭卫宁, 司莉. 国外语义搜索引擎调查与分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013, 57(23): 121-129.

Guo Weining, Si Li. Investigation and Analysis on Semantic Search Engines Abroad[J]. LIS, 2013, 57(23): 121-129.

参考文献

[1] Berners-Lee T, Hendler J, Lassila O. The semantic Web[J]. Scientific American, 2001, 284(5): 28-37.
[2] 苏明明, 宋文.基于本体的语义搜索引擎解决方案研究新进展[J].现代图书情报技术, 2008(11):24-28.
[3] Radhakrishnan A.9 semantic search engines that will change the world of search[J/OL].[2013-04-20].http://www.searchenginejournal.com/semantic-search-engines/9832/.
[4] Mankani Y.Top 10 semantic engines:Best alternative to Google search engine to get more accurate results[EB/OL].[2013-04-20].http://www.savedelete.com/top-10-best-semantic-search-engines-to-get-more-accurate-results.html.
[5] Ramachandran A, Sujatha R.Semantic search engine:A survey[J]. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 2011, 2 (6):1806-1811.
[6] 赵宏亮, 杨鹤标. 面向领域的语义搜索引擎的应用研究[J]. 计算机工程与设计, 2012, 33(5): 1801-1805.
[7] Paiva S, Ramos-Cabrer M, Gil-Solla A. GSSP-A generic semantic search platform[J]. Procedia Technology, 2012(5): 388-396.
[8] 何琳, 杜慧平, 侯汉清.一种基于领域本体的语义检索系统的设计与实现[J]. 图书情报工作, 2008, 52(8): 85-88.
[9] 赵夷平. 传统搜索引擎与语义搜索引擎服务比较研究[J]. 情报科学, 2010, 28(2): 265-270.
[10] Kassim J M, Rahmany M. Introduction to semantic search engine[C]//International Conference onElectrical Engineering and Informatics.Selangor:IEEE, 2009: 380-386.
[11] Marshall M. Microsoft to buy semantic search engine powerset for $100M plus[EB/OL].[2013-04-21].http://venturebeat.com/2008/06/26/microsoft-to-buy-semantic-search-engine-powerset-for-100m-plus/.
[12] Lau A. Baidu: We do semantic search better than google[EB/OL].[2013-04-21].http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2179779/Baidu-We-Do-Semantic-Search-Better-Than-Google.
[13] Sullivan D.Google launches knowledge graph to provide answers, not just links[EB/OL].[2013-04-20]. http://searchengineland.com/google-launches-knowledge-graph-121585.
[14][OL].[2013-04-20].http://www.exalead.com/search/.
[15][OL].[2013-04-20].http://cognition.com/.
[16][OL].[2013-04-20].http://hakia.com.
[17][OL].[2013-04-28].http://swoogle.umbc.edu.
[18][OL].[2013-04-22].http://www.lexxe.com.
[19][OL].[2013-04-28].http://www.factbites.com/.
[20][OL].[2013-05-18].http://www.sensebot.net.
[21][OL].[2013-05-18].http://www.deepdyve.com.
[22][OL].[2013-05-18].https://duckduckgo.com.
[23][OL].[2013-05-25].http://sindice.com.
[24][OL].[2013-05-25].http://www.cluuz.com.
[25][OL].[2013-05-25].http://www.yummly.com/.
[26][OL].[2013-05-25].http://kngine.com/index.html.
[27] Rao Leena. Semantic recipe search engine yummly raises $6M from unilever and others[EB/OL].[2013-04-22].http://techcrunch.com/2012/03/21/semantic-recipe-search-engine-yummly-raises-6m-from-unilever-and-others.
[28] Ha Anthony. Kngine aims to build a natural language-driven app that can answer any question[EB/OL].[2013-04-22].http://techcrunch.com/2012/11/30/kngine/.
[29] Query detection and extraction-QDEX-system[EB/OL].[2013-04-23]. http://company.hakia.com/qdex.html).
[30] Commercial ontology[EB/OL].[2013-04-23].http://company.hakia.com/commercialontology.html.
[31] SemanticRank algorithm[EB/OL].[2013-04-23] http://company.hakia.com/semanticrank.html.
[32][OL].[2013-07-20].http://www.lexxe.com/technology.html.
[33] FAQ about semantic keys[EB/OL].[2013-07-20].http://www.lexxe.com/semkey_faq.html.
[34] What technology do you use?[EB/OL].[2013-07-18].http://www.sensebot.net/about.htm.
[35][OL].[2013-08-03].http://kngine.com/Technology.html.
[36] Tumer D, Shah M A, Bitirim Y. An empirical evaluation on semantic search performance of keyword-based and semantic search engines: Google, Yahoo, Msn and Hakia[C]//Fourth International Conference on Internet Monitoring and Protection.Venice:IEEE, 2009: 51-55.
[37] Calsavara A, Schmidt G. Semantic search engines[M]//Larios V, Ramos F F, Unger H.Advanced Distributed Systems.Berlin:Springer, 2004: 145-157.
[38] What is semantic search?[EB/OL].[2013-03-20].http://company.hakia.com/whatis.html.
[39][OL].[2013-03-20].https://startpage.com/.
[40] Doc Sheldon.Semantic search in 2025[EB/OL].[2013-03-16].http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2222577/Semantic-Search-in-2025.
[41] Fazzinga B, Lukasiewicz T. Semantic search on the Web[J]. Semantic Web, 2010, 1(1): 89-96.

国外语义搜索引擎调查与分析

Investigation and Analysis on Semantic Search Engines Abroad

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	黄崑, 陈佳琦, 刘畅. 面向任务难度感知的检索行为研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(3): 83-92.
[2]	王伟, 梁继文, 杨建林. 基于引文网络的领域主题层次结构识别方法研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(17): 81-92.
[3]	司莉, 郭财强. 基于内容分析的数字人文领域中知识组织价值体现研究综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(13): 127-137.
[4]	欧阳剑, 梁珠芳, 任树怀. 大规模中国历代存世典籍知识图谱构建研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(5): 126-135.
[5]	丁培. 学术图表知识发现技术框架及研究进展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(23): 136-148.
[6]	方舟, 洪采菲, 秦姝言, 刘畅. 自我调节学习情境下任务类型和学习认知策略对视频类搜索行为的影响[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(21): 84-96.
[7]	李璐, 马捷, 孙恒宇, 王珏. 面向中医诊疗知识库的医案元数据模型构建研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(2): 4-16.
[8]	张运良. 大数据服务中知识组织的挑战及应对[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(4): 88-94.
[9]	纪姗姗, 赵炳容, 刘峥. 国外知识组织体系管理工具比较分析与启示[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(24): 73-83.
[10]	邓君, 钟楚依, 王阮, 宋雪雁, 刘沁淳. 清代职官知识组织与关联分析——以《长春县志·长春职官考释表》为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(17): 18-26.
[11]	邱科达, 马建玲. 机器学习在术语抽取研究中的文献计量分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(14): 94-103.
[12]	阮光册, 樊宇航, 夏磊. 知识图谱在实体检索中的应用研究综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(14): 126-135.
[13]	常春, 杨婧, 李永泽. 知识组织生态系统构架形成与研究进展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(7): 146-150.
[14]	刘宁静, 刘音, 王莫言, 郭晶. 数字人文视角下学术名人知识模型构建研究——以李政道数字资源中心为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(23): 113-121.
[15]	李玲, 陈超. 基于雨课堂的科技信息检索课翻转课堂教学[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(12): 66-71.