图书情报工作 ›› 2021, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (18): 125-132.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.18.013

• 情报研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于论文合作关系的科研项目专家回避模型研究

戴石钰, 石进, 李明   

  1. 南京大学信息管理学院 南京 210023
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-18 修回日期:2021-07-23 出版日期:2021-09-20 发布日期:2021-09-26
  • 通讯作者: 石进(ORCID:0000-0002-1621-6944),教授,博士,博士生导师,通讯作者,E-mail:shijin@nju.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:戴石钰(ORCID:0000-0001-5368-7676),硕士研究生;李明(ORCID:0000-0003-3693-3681),副教授,硕士生导师。

Research on Expert Avoidance Model of Scientific Research Projects Based on Paper Cooperation Relationship

Dai Shiyu, Shi Jin, Li Ming   

  1. School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023
  • Received:2021-03-18 Revised:2021-07-23 Online:2021-09-20 Published:2021-09-26

摘要: [目的/意义]针对科研项目评审专家选取工作中的回避问题,试图提出一套可行的用于确定回避专家的模型方法,避免人际关系对评审工作的干扰,保障科研评价的规范性和公正性。[方法/过程]首先以专家与申请人之间的论文合作关系为切入点,以合作强度、合作作者深度、方向匹配度和评审业绩为主要指标;然后采用综合权重和修正TOPSIS法对各指标进行分析,构建面向科研项目的专家回避量化模型;最后根据规定的专家组成员数量,考虑年龄、机构、性别等分布情况,明确应该回避的专家。[结果/结论]经检验,该模型在给出回避专家名单时,可以有效避免"唯合作论"的问题,回避理由充分,符合科技管理部的专家选取要求,能够为专家遴选工作提供一定的决策支撑。

关键词: 论文合作关系, 专家回避模型, 修正TOPSIS法, 科研项目

Abstract: [Purpose/significance] Aiming at the avoidance problem in the selection of peer review experts for scientific research projects, this paper tries to put forward a set of feasible model methods to determine the avoidance experts, so as to avoid the interference of interpersonal relationship on the evaluation work and ensure the standardization and fairness of scientific research evaluation.[Method/process] Firstly, the paper cooperation relationship between experts and applicants was taken as the entry point, and the cooperation intensity, the depth of co-authors, the direction matching degree and the review performance were taken as the main indicators. Then, the comprehensive weight and modified TOPSIS were used to analyze each index, and the quantitative model of expert avoidance for scientific research projects was constructed. Finally, according to the specified number of members of the expert group, considering the distribution of age, institution, gender, etc., the experts that should be avoided were identified.[Result/conclusion] Through case analysis, it is found that this model effectively avoids the problem of "only cooperation theory" when giving the list of experts to avoid, and has sufficient reasons to avoid, which meets the requirements of expert selection of the Ministry of Science and Technology Management and can provide certain decision support for expert selection.

Key words: paper cooperation relationship, expert avoidance model, modified TOPSIS, scientific research projects

中图分类号: