[目的/意义]充分掌握欧美高校图书馆出版服务保存策略的特点及其发展趋势，为国内高校图书馆出版服务提供参考。[方法/过程]以美国图书馆出版联盟发布的《图书馆出版名录》（2014-2018）的数据为基础，结合网络调查和文献调研，采用比较分析法和辩证分析法，对近年来欧美高校图书馆出版服务的保存策略进行分析和研究。[结果/结论]结果表明：①欧美高校图书馆出版服务保存策略种类繁多，近一半的图书馆同时采用多种保存策略；②多年的发展已经形成了主流保存策略；③内部保存、联盟保存成为重要的保存方式；④云存储、第三方保存特点明显。国内高校图书馆选择保存策略时，应充分考虑出版的文献类型、采用的出版平台、参加的保存联盟等因素。
[Purpose/significance]This article aims to fully grasp the characteristics and development trends of the preservation strategies for university library publishing services in Europe and the United States, and give suggestions to Chinese university libraries on publishing services.[Method/process] Based on the data of Library Publishing Directory (2014-2018) released by the American Library Publishing Coalition, combined with network survey and literature research, the methods of comparative analysis and dialectical analysis are used to study the preservation strategies of publishing services of European and American university libraries in recent years.[Result/conclusion] The results show that, (1)there are a great variety of preservation strategies for publishing services of European and American university libraries, and nearly half of the libraries choose multiple preservation strategies; (2) mainstream preservation strategies have been formed; (3) the preservation strategies of in-house and alliance become important methods; (4) the characteristics of cloud-storage and third-party preservation are obvious. University libraries in China should take full account of the types of documents published, the publishing platforms adopted and the preservation alliances they participate in, when choosing preservation strategies.
[1] Library Publishing coalition.Library Publishing Directory(2014)[EB/OL].[2017-08-16]. https://www.librarypublishing. org/sites/librarypublishing.org/files/documents/LPC_LPDirectory2014.pdf.
[2] Library Publishing coalition.Library Publishing Directory(2015)[EB/OL].[2017-08-16]. https://www.librarypublishing.org/sites/librarypublishing.org/files/documents/lpc_dir_2015lpd. Pdf.
[3] Library Publishing coalition.Library Publishing Directory(2016)[EB/OL].[2017-08-16]. https://www.librarypublishing.org/sites/librarypublishing.org/files/documents/Library_Publishing_Directory_2016.pdf.
[4] Library Publishing coalition.Library Publishing Directory(2017)[EB/OL].[2017-08-16]. https://www.librarypublishing.org/sites/librarypublishing.org/files/2017%20Directory.pdf.
[5] Library Publishing Coalition. Library Publishing Directory 2018[EB/OL].[2018-12-24].https://librarypublishing.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/LPC_LPDirectory2018.pdf.
[6] 魏蕊,初景利.美国大学图书馆基于机构知识库的出版服务实践研究[J].大学图书馆学报,2015,33(3):5-11,21.
[7] 游祎.国外高校图书馆出版服务现状研究——基于《图书馆出版名录》的分析[J].图书馆学刊,2014,36(11):135-137,143.
[8] 游祎.基于学术交流的图书馆出版服务探析[J].大学图书馆学报,2015,33(1):61-65.
[9] 谌爱容.国外大学图书馆出版服务进展概况——基于《图书馆出版名录》的统计分析[J].山东图书馆学刊,2016(6):62-66.
[10] 隗静秋.基于《图书馆出版名录》的英国高校图书馆出版实践研究[J].图书馆论坛,2015,35(10):125-131.
[11] 孙杰,李淑媛.境外大学图书馆学术出版服务实践进展[J].图书情报工作,2016,60(2):64-70.
[12] 刘兹恒,苗美娟.北美高校图书馆出版服务研究[J].图书馆建设,2016(3):43-48,54.
[13] Digital Publishing Services[EB/OL].[2018-09-28]. https://www.usfca.edu/library/digitalpublishing.
[14] What Is LOCKSS?[EB/OL].[2018-03-16]. http://www.lockss.org.
[15] 夏志锋,李秋实.CLOCKSS:管控的LOCKSS[J].现代情报,2007,27(11):80-81.
[16] 吴建中.HathiTrust[EB/OL].[2018-09-28]. http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_53586b810100ys1h.html.
[17] 代江龙.高校数字图书馆建设的版权风险规避——兼评Authors Guild等诉Hathi Trust案[J].图书馆,2015(11):91-95.
[18] 董晓莉,龙伟.大数据时代合作模式下的图书馆数字资源长期保存模型分析[J].现代情报,2017,37(7):110-115.
[19] 王若琳.LOCKSS——实现网络电子资源的持久保存[J].图书馆杂志,2007,26(2):58-60.
[20] How DDP Works[EB/OL].[2018-03-18]. http://www.metaarchive.org.
[21] Dura Cloud[EB/OL].[2018-03-22]. https://duraspace.org/.
[22] 赵毅.电子期刊长期保存方案的比较研究[D].郑州:郑州大学,2017.
[23] 丁艳君,郑建程.Portico:第三方数字资源长期保存模式初探[J].图书情报工作,2009,53(3):74-77.
[24] 孙超,吴振新.国外数字资源长期保存成熟度模型及其分析与评价[J].图书情报工作,2017,61(1):32-39.
[25] 潘菊英,刘可静.国外数字资源长期保存和长效利用研究进展[J].图书馆,2011(5):72-76.
