图书情报工作 ›› 2018, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (3): 39-44.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.03.005

• 工作研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

电子资源订购决策评价的若干思考——以中国科学院电子资源集团采购为例

罗祺姗, 翟爽, 张静   

  1. 中国科学院文献情报中心 北京 100190
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-04 修回日期:2017-12-04 出版日期:2018-02-05 发布日期:2018-02-05
  • 作者简介:罗祺姗,副研究馆员,博士,E-mail:luoqs@mail.las.ac.cn;翟爽(ORCID:0000-0002-4328-8898),馆员,硕士;张静,馆员。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系2016年中国科学院文献情报能力建设专项子项目"院所协同的电子资源采购绩效评估体系和优化分析服务平台"(项目编号:院1675-2)研究成果之一。

Study on the Acquisition Decision Assessment of Electronic Resources: A Case Study of the Group Purchasing of the National Science Library of CAS

Luo Qishan, Zhai Shuang, Zhang Jing   

  1. National Science Library of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190
  • Received:2017-09-04 Revised:2017-12-04 Online:2018-02-05 Published:2018-02-05

摘要: [目的/意义]建立符合实际工作特点的电子资源订购决策评价指标体系框架,设计科学合理的评价结果运用原则与运用模式,为制定科学合理的电子资源订购决策提供支撑。[方法/过程]结合国内外电子资源订购决策评价理论与实践,以中国科学院集团订购电子资源工作为例,分析和设计电子资源订购决策评价指标体系的评价原则、评价内容和评价指标。[结果/结论]构建包含5个评价方面18项评价指标的决策评价指标体系框架,并提出"需求优先、质量保障、成本优化、综合考虑"的评价结果运用原则以及纵向比较、横向比较和分类比较的评价结果运用模式。

关键词: 电子资源, 集团采购, 订购决策评价, 指标体系

Abstract: [Purpose/significance]Taking the characteristics of electronic resources acquisition work into consideration, this paper establishes a framework of the indicator system of the acquisition decision assessment and builds the application guidelines for its use in order to provide support for making a scientific and reasonable acquisition decision. [Method/process]Based on the theory and experience of the acquisition decision assessment of electronic resources carried out by the main information institutions, taking the characteristics of electronic resources acquired by the Chinese Academy of Sciences Consortium for instance,this paper analyzed the assessment principles, assessment concepts and indicators. [Result/conclusion]This paper establishes the framework of the indicator system of the acquisition decision assessment which contains five assessment concepts and eighteen indicators, and builds the application guidelines-demand first, quality guarantee, cost optimization and overall consideration. It also puts forward three application models which are the vertical comparison, horizontal comparison and sorting comparison.

Key words: electronic resources, group purchasing, acquisition decision assessment, indicator system

中图分类号: