图书情报工作 ›› 2014, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (10): 67-73.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2014.10.011

• 理论研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

中美研究型图书馆用户义务性规范比较研究

付立宏, 周古玥   

  1. 郑州大学信息管理学院
  • 收稿日期:2014-04-22 修回日期:2014-05-03 出版日期:2014-05-20 发布日期:2014-05-20
  • 作者简介:付立宏,郑州大学信息管理学院教授,管理学博士,E-mail:fulihong518@126.com;周古玥,郑州大学信息管理学院本科生

Comparative Research on User’s Compulsory Norms of Research Libraries in China and America

Fu Lihong, Zhou Guyue   

  1. Information Management School, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001
  • Received:2014-04-22 Revised:2014-05-03 Online:2014-05-20 Published:2014-05-20

摘要:

逐项比较中国和美国10所研究型图书馆网站发布的用户义务性规范涉及入馆、馆内自由活动、阅览室行为、外借、知识产权、信息安全、驻馆、馆内财产保护等方面的规定,得出4点结论:①前者设置的义务性规范较详细,后者约束用户的义务性规范较简略;②前者着力于给用户设定低端义务性规范,后者侧重给用户设定高端义务性规范;③针对特殊用户群体制定特殊义务性规范值得推崇;④总分结合是研究型图书馆用户义务性规范的最佳模式。

关键词: 中国, 美国, 研究型图书馆, 用户, 义务性规范

Abstract:

The user's compulsory norms of ten research libraries in China and America showed on their websites involve entrance into the library, moving freely inside the library, behaviors inside the reading room, borrowing, intellectual property rights, information security, staying in the library, protection of library's property,etc. This paper draws four conclusions by comparing them:①the former's compulsory norms are specific, the latter are a little simple;②the former focuses on making the lower compulsory norms, the latter making the higher;③the action of making special compulsory norms for special user should be praised;④the best model of library compulsory norms is the generality plus the division.

Key words: China, America, research library, user, compulsory norms

中图分类号: