一种新的用户需求组织方式：需求语义网络

doi:10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2014.17.019

图书情报工作 ›› 2014, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (17): 125-130,91.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2014.17.019

一种新的用户需求组织方式：需求语义网络

陈烨, 赵一鸣

武汉大学信息资源研究中心

收稿日期:2014-06-17 修回日期:2014-08-03 出版日期:2014-09-05 发布日期:2014-09-05
作者简介:陈烨，武汉大学信息资源研究中心硕士研究生，E-mail：chenye_lyd@126.com；赵一鸣，武汉大学信息资源研究中心助理研究员，博士后。
基金资助:
本文系国家自然科学基金重点国际合作项目“大数据环境下的知识组织与服务创新研究”（项目编号：71420107026）和国家自然科学基金青年项目“基于词汇空间集聚的潜在主题发现方法及其实现研究”（项目编号：71403190）研究成果之一。

A New Method of User Need Organization：Semantic Web of Need

Chen Ye, Zhao Yiming

Center for the Studies of Information Resources, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072

Received:2014-06-17 Revised:2014-08-03 Online:2014-09-05 Published:2014-09-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

提出基于关联数据技术组织用户需求的设想及其架构——需求语义网络模型，该模型由数据层、需求信息层、应用层组成，需求信息层是整个模型的核心，其构建包括需求信息建模、需求信息命名、需求信息RDF化、需求信息发布、开放查询5个步骤，需求语义网络构建的重点和难点包括用户需求及关系的定义与描述、用户需求的关联与分解、需求网络中各层次之间的协作与交流以及匹配服务器的延伸和扩展等，最后，将需求语义网络理论应用到高校图书馆个性化知识服务中，提出基于关联数据的高校图书馆图书需求语义网络的构建模型。

关键词: 需求语义网络, 关联数据, 用户需求, 需求建模, 知识服务

Abstract:

This paper presents a prospect of a linked data technology based method of user need organization: semantic web of need, and the model of which includes Data Layer, Web of need Layer and Application Layer. The publishing process of the second layer includes five steps: need modeling, need naming, need RDF, need publishing, and opened query. Besides, we point out four key challenges in the construction of semantic web of need: the definition and description of user need and their relationships, the combination and decomposition of user need, the collaboration and communication of different layers and the extension and expansion of matching servers. Finally, the theory of semantic web of need is applied to the college library personalized knowledge service, and a framework of linked data based semantic web of need of book of college library is proposed.

Key words: semantic Web of need, linked data, user need, need modeling, knowledge service

中图分类号:

G250.7

陈烨, 赵一鸣. 一种新的用户需求组织方式：需求语义网络[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(17): 125-130,91.

Chen Ye, Zhao Yiming. A New Method of User Need Organization：Semantic Web of Need[J]. LIS, 2014, 58(17): 125-130,91.

参考文献

[1] 张晓林.走向知识服务:寻找新世纪图书情报工作的生长点[J].中国图书馆学报,2000,26(5): 32-37.

[2] 关庆珍,周竹荣.基于Ontology 的用户模型研究[J].计算机应用,2008,27(10):2504-2507.

[3] 蒋秀林.基于分词技术和用户模型的非结构化知识管理系统[D].南京:南京航空航天大学,2012.

[4] Mladenic D. Personal webwatcher: Implementation and design[R]. Technical Report IJS-DP-7472. Slovenia: Department of Intelligent Systems, J. Stefan Institute, 1996: 1-2.

[5] 林鸿飞,杨元生.用户兴趣模型的表示和更新机制[J].计算机研究与发展,2002,39(7):843-847.

[6] Asnicar F A, Tasso C. IfWeb: A prototype of user model-based intelligent agent for document filtering and navigation in the World Wide Web[C]//Proceedings of Workshop Adaptive Systems and User Modeling on the World Wide Web'at 6th International Conference on User Modeling. Chia Laguna: Springer-Verlag,1997: 3-11.

[7] Kamba T, Sakagami H, Koseki Y. Anatagonomy: A personalized newspaper on the World Wide Web[J]. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 1997, 46(6): 789-803.

[8] 徐振宁,张维明.基于Ontology的智能信息检索[J].计算机科学,2001,28(6):21-26.

[9] Adomavicius G, Tuzhilin A. Using data mining methods to build customer profiles[J]. IEEE Computer, 2001, 34(2): 74-82.

[10] Billsus D, Pazzani M. Learning probabilistic user models[EB/OL].[2014-02-20].http://www.researchgate.net/publication/2638651_Learning_Probabilistic_User_Models.

[11] Domingos P, Pazzani M. On the optimality of the simple Bayesian classifier under zero-one loss[J]. Machine Learning, 1997, 29(2-3): 103-130.

[12] Rocchio J J. Relevance feedback in information retrieval[C]// The SMART Retrieval System-Experiments in Automated Document Processing. Upper Saddle Rive: Prentice-Hall, 1971:313-323.

[13] Carman M J, Mark B, Fabio C. Tag data and personalized information retrieval[C]// Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Workshop on Search in Social Media. New Work:ACM, 2008:27-34.

[14] Wetzker R, Zimmermann C, Bauckhage C, et al. I tag, you tag:Translating tags for advanced user models[C]// Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. New Work:ACM, 2010:71-80.

[15] Xu Shengliang, Bao Shenghua, Fei Ben, et al. Exploring folksonomy for personalized search[C]// Proceedings of the 31st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New Work:ACM, 2008:155-162.

[16] Calegari S, Pasi G. Personal ontologies: Generation of user profiles based on the YAGO ontology[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2012, 49(3): 640-658.

[17] Cena F, Likavec S, Osborne F. Anisotropic propagation of user interests in ontology-based user models[J]. Information Sciences, 2013, 250: 40-60.

[18] Razmerita L. An ontology-based framework for modeling user behavior—A case study in knowledge management[J]. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, IEEE Transactions on, 2011, 41(4): 772-783.

[19] Berners-Lee T. Design issues: Linked data[EB/OL].[2014-02-20]. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html.

[20] Structured Dynamics. Linked Data FAQ[EB/OL].[2014-02-20]. http://structureddynamics.com/linked_data.html.

[21] Wikipedia. Linked data[EB/OL].[2014-02-20]. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linked_data.

[22] Bizer C, Jentzsch A, Cyganiak R. State of the LOD cloud[EB/OL].[2014-02-20]. http://lod-cloud.net/state/.

[23] W3C. Library Linked Data Incubator Group[EB/OL]. [2014-02-20]. http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/.

[24] Kobilarov G, Scott T, Raimond Y, et al. Media meets semantic Web-How the BBC uses DBpedia and linked data to make connections[M]//The Semantic Web:Research and Applications. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 2009: 723-737.

[25] Jonquet C, LePendu P, Falconer S, et al. NCBO resource index: Ontology-based search and mining of biomedical resources[J]. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 2011, 9(3): 316-324.

[26] Becker C, Bizer C. DBpedia mobile: A location-enabled linked data browser[C]//Proceedings of the WWW 2008 Workshop Linked Data on the Web (LDOW2008). Beijing: Science Press, 2008: 369.

[27] Brickley D, Miller L. FOAF vocabulary specification 0.99[EB/OL]. [2014-04-12].http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/20140114.html.

[28] The Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. Dublin Core Metadata Element Set, Version 1.1[EB/OL].[2014-02-20].http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.

[29] Sauermann L,Cyganiak R. Cool URIs for the semantic Web—W3C Interest Group Note 03 December 2008[EB/OL]. [2014-04-12]. http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/NOTE-cooluris-20081203/.

[30] Cyganiak R, Bizer C. Pubby: A linked data frontend for SPAROL endpoints[EB/OL].[2014-02-20]. http://wifo5-03.informatik.uni-mannheim.de/pubby/.

[31] Reynolds D. Elda: Epimorphics linked data API implementation[EB/OL].[2014-02-20]. http://code.google.com/p/elda/.

[32] Talis. TalisPlatform[EB/OL].[2014-02-20]. http://docs.api.talis.com/.

[33] Bizer C, Cyganiak R. D2r server-publishing relational databases on the semantic Web[EB/OL]. [2014-02-20]. http://d2rq.org/d2r-server.

[34] Auer S, Dietzold S, Lehmann J, et al. Triplify:Light-weight linked data publication from relational databases[C]//Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web. New York: ACM, 2009: 621-630.

[35] Virtuoso. Virtuoso universal server[EB/OL].[2014-02-20]. http://virtuoso.openlinksw.com/.

[36] Bizer C, Cyganiak R, Gau β T. The RDF Book Mashup:From Web APIs to a Web of data[C]//Proceedings of the 3nd Workshop on Scripting for the Semantic Web (SFSW '07). Innsbruck: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2007:1-8.

[37] Möller K, Heath T, Handschuh S, et al. Recipes for semantic Web dog food—The ESWC and ISWC metadata projects[M]//The Semantic Web. Berlin Heidelberg:Springer, 2007: 802-815.

[38] Coetzee P, Heath T,Enrico M. SparqPlug: Generating linked data from legacy HTML, SPARQL and the DOM[EB/OL].[2014-02-20]. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.121.3325.

一种新的用户需求组织方式：需求语义网络

A New Method of User Need Organization：Semantic Web of Need

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	韦景竹, 操慧子, 张乐乐. 基于在线评论的公共文化云活动用户需求研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(9): 66-73.
[2]	宋姬芳. 以信息资源建设助推大学图书馆"十四五"知识服务能力提升——以中国人民大学图书馆为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(5): 63-71.
[3]	黄永文, 孙坦, 赵瑞雪, 鲜国建, 李娇, 罗婷婷. 大数据与人工智能背景下新型知识服务研究与实践[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(19): 36-46.
[4]	王萍, 宋婧馨, 黄新平, 初彦伯, 李依凝. 基于Kano模型的网络存档资源用户利用需求研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(17): 25-34.
[5]	叶莎莎, 杜婉鹏, 杜杏叶. 信息茧房视域下移动知识服务使用影响因素研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(16): 117-124.
[6]	张云中, 刘嘉琳, 陈涛. 馆藏唐三彩数字文化资源展示的语义支撑体系研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(15): 116-126.
[7]	司莉, 郭财强. 基于内容分析的数字人文领域中知识组织价值体现研究综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(13): 127-137.
[8]	高雁, 郝敏, 曾粤亮. 小学生用户公共图书馆研学旅行需求及满意度研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(12): 48-58.
[9]	肖雪, 邢畅, 李明昭. 用户需求导向的高校图书馆有声阅读服务研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(8): 21-32.
[10]	高劲松, 付家炜, 李珂. 敦煌壁画叙词表关联数据实体语义相似度计算方法与实验[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(8): 97-106.
[11]	程结晶, 王心雨. 敦煌遗书图像知识关联与语义描述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(7): 123-131.
[12]	涂育红, 姚伟, 杨晓平. 高校图书馆知识服务效能影响因素及其作用机理研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(24): 71-79.
[13]	郭顺利, 步辉. 融合Word2vec和WGRA的社会化问答社区答案有用性排序方法研究——以携程问答为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(23): 126-135.
[14]	崔竞烽, 郑德俊, 洪诚, 夏雯娟. 高参与度科普类微博知识内容价值共创研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(16): 14-24.
[15]	张云中, 郭冬, 王亚鸽, 孙平. 基于知识图谱的红色历史人物知识问答服务框架研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(16): 108-117.