[1] Ingwersen P, Jarvelin K. The turn: Integration of information seeking and retrieval in context(the information retrieval series)[M]. New York: Springer-Verlag, Inc., 2005.
[2] Robertson S E, Hancock-Beaulieu M M.On the evaluation of IR systems[J]. Information Processing & Management, 1992, 28(4): 457-466.
[3] Cuadra C A, Katter R V. Opening the black box of “relevance”[J]. Journal of Documentation, 1967, 23(4): 291-303.
[4] Rees A M, Schultz D G. A field experimental approach to the study of relevance assessments in relation to document searching[R]. Cleveland: Case Western Reserve University,1967.
[5] Schamber L. Users' criteria for evaluation in multimedia information seeking and use situations[D]. New York: Syracuse University, 1991.
[6] Park T K.The nature of relevance in information retrieval: An empirical study[J]. The Library Quarterly, 1993,63(3):318-351.
[7] Cuadra C A.Experimental studies of relevance judgments. Final report. Volume 1:Project summary[M].Santa Monica: System Development Corporation, 1967.
[8] Bateman J A. Modeling changes in end-user relevance criteria: An information seeking study[D]. Texas: University of North Texas, 1998.
[9] Vakkari P, Hakala N. Changes in relevance criteria and problem stages in task performance[J]. Journal of Documentation, 2000, 56(5): 540-562.
[10] Eisenberg M, Barry C. Order effects: A study of the possible influence of presentation order on user judgments of document relevance[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1988, 39(5): 293-300.
[11] Janes J W, McKinney R. Relevance judgments of actual users and secondary judges: A comparative study[J]. The Library Quarterly, 1992, 62(2): 150-168.
[12] Janes J W. Other people's judgments:A comparison of users' and others' judgments of document relevance, topicality, and utility[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1994, 45(3): 160-171.
[13] Spink A, Greisdorf H, Bateman J. Examining different regions of relevance: From highly relevant to not relevant[C]//Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting. Pittsburgh: American Society for Information Science and Technology, 1998: 3-12.
[14] Hirsh S G. Children's relevance criteria and information seeking on electronic resources[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1999, 50(14): 1265-1283.
[15] Cool C, Belkin N, Frieder O, et al. Characteristics of text affecting relevance judgments[C]//Proceedings of the 14th National Online Meeting. New York: Learned Information Inc., 1993: 77-81.
[16] Janes J W. Relevance judgments and the incremental presentation of document representations[J]. Information Processing & Management, 1991, 27(6): 629-646.
[17] Maglaughlin K L, Sonnenwald D H. User perspectives on relevance criteria: A comparison among relevant, partially relevant, and not-relevant judgments[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2002, 53(5): 327-342.
[18] Sedghi S, Sanderson M, Clough P. A study on the relevance criteria for medical images[J]. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2008, 29(15): 2046-2057.
[19] Savolainen R, Kari J. User-defined relevance criteria in Web searching[J]. Journal of Documentation, 2006, 62(6): 685-707.
[20] Taylor A R, Cool C, Belkin N J,et al. Relationships between categories of relevance criteria and stage in task completion[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2007, 43(4): 1071- 1084.
[21] Taylor A. Relevance criterion choices in relation to search progress[D]. New Brunswick: Rutgers University, 2009.
[22] Taylor A, Zhang Xiangmin, Amadio W J. Examination of relevance criteria choices and the information search process[J]. Journal of Documentation, 2009, 65(5): 719-744.
[23] Papaeconomou C, Zijlema A F, Ingwersen P. Searchers' relevance judgments and criteria in evaluating Web pages in a learning style perspective[C]//Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Information Interaction in Context. Texas: ACM, 2008: 123-132.
[24] Burton V T, Chadwick S A. Investigating the practices of student researchers: Patterns of use and criteria for use of Internet and library sources[J]. Computers and Composition, 2000, 17(3): 309-328.
[25] Hamid R A, Thom J A. Criteria that have an effect on users while making image relevance judgments[C]//Fifteenth Australasian Document Computing Symposium. Melbourne:RMIT University, 2010: 1-8.
[26] Balatsoukas P, Ruthven I. What eyes can tell about the use of relevance criteria during predictive relevance judgment?[C]//Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Information Interaction in Context. Texas: ACM, 2010: 389-394.
[27] Balatsoukas P, Ruthven I. An eye-tracking approach to the analysis of relevance judgments on the Web: The case of Google search engine[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012, 63(9): 1728-1746.
[28] Balatsoukas P, Ruthven I. The use of relevance criteria during predictive judgment: An eye tracking approach[J]. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 47(1): 1-10.
[29] Inskip C, MacFarlane A, Rafferty P. Creative professional users' musical relevance criteria[J]. Journal of Information Science, 2010, 36(4): 517-529.
[30] Savolainen R. Source preference criteria in the context of everyday projects: Relevance judgments made by prospective home buyers[J]. Journal of Documentation, 2010, 66(1): 70-92.
[31] Laplante A. Users' relevance criteria in music retrieval in everyday life: An exploratory study[C]//Proceedings of the 11th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference. Utrecht: ISMIR, 2010: 601-606.
[32] Taylor A. User relevance criteria choices and the information search process[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2012, 48(1): 136-153.
[33] Taylor A. Examination of work task and criteria choices for the relevance judgment process[J]. Journal of Documentation, 2013, 69(4): 523-544.
[34] Janes J W. The binary nature of continuous relevance judgments: A study of users' perceptions[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1991, 42(10): 754-756.
[35] Wang Peiling. Contextualizing user relevance criteria:A meta-ethnographic approach to user-centered relevance studies[C]//Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Information Interaction in Context. Texas: ACM, 2010: 293-298.
[36] Wang Peiling. A cognitive model of document selection of real users of information retrieval systems[M]. College Park: University of Maryland at College Park, 1994.
[37] Tang Rong, Solomon P. Toward an understanding of the dynamics of relevance judgment: An analysis of one person's search behavior[J]. Information Processing & Management, 1998, 34(2): 237-256.
[38] Wang Peiling, Soergel D. A cognitive model of document use during a research project. Study I. Document selection[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1998, 49(2): 115-133.
[39] Wang Peiling, Domas White M. A cognitive model of document use during a research project. Study ll. Decisions at the reading and citing stages[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1999, 50(2): 98-114.
[40] Howard D L. Pertinence as reflected in personal constructs[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1994, 45(3): 172-185.
[41] Tang Rong, Solomon P. Use of relevance criteria across stages of document evaluation: On the complementarity of experimental and naturalistic studies[J]. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology, 2001, 52(8): 676-685.
[42] Kim S, Oh J S, Oh S. Best-answer selection criteria in a social Q&A site from the user-oriented relevance perspective[J]. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007, 44(1): 1-15.
[43] 成颖. 信息检索相关性判据及应用研究[D]. 南京: 南京大学, 2011.
[44] Barry C L. The identification of user criteria of relevance and document characteristics: Beyond the topical approach to information retrieval[D]. New York: Syracuse University, 1993.
[45] Park T K. The nature of relevance in information retrieval: An empirical study[J]. The Library Quarterly, 1993, 63(3): 318-351.
[46] Meng Yang, Marchionini G. Exploring users' video relevance criteria-A pilot study[C]//Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Providence: American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2004: 229-238.
[47] Barry C L. User-defined relevance criteria:An exploratory study[J]. Journal of American Society and Information Science, 1994, 45(3): 149-159.
[48] Nilan M S, Peek R P, Snyder H W. A methodology for tapping user evaluation behaviors: An exploration of users' strategy, source and information evaluating[C]//Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science. Atlanta: American Society for Information Science and Technology,1988:152-159.
[49] Crystal A, Greenberg J. Relevance criteria identified by health information users during Web searches[J]. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology, 2006, 57(10): 1368-1382.
[50] Lawley K N, Soergel D, Huang Xiaoli. Relevance criteria used by teachers in selecting oral history materials[J]. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2005, 42(1): 421-448.
[51] Westbrook L. Faculty relevance criteria: Internalized user needs[J]. Library Trends, 2001, 50(2): 197-206.
[52] Park T K. Toward a theory of user-based relevance: A call for a new paradigm of inquiry[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1994, 45(3): 135-141.
[53] Schamber L, Bateman J. User criteria in relevance evaluation: Toward development of a measurement scale[C]//Proceedings of the Annual Meeting-American Society for Information Science. Baltirnore: American Society for Information Science and Technology, 1996: 218-225.
[54] Tombros A, Ruthven I, Jose J M. Searchers' criteria for assessing Web pages[C]//Proceedings of the 26th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Informaion Retrieval. Texas: ACM, 2003: 385-386.
[55] 于春, 彭爱东, 王波,等. 信息用户对信息检索相关性判断的因素分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2009,53(3): 103-107.
[56] Barnes M D, Penrod C, Neiger B L,et al. Measuring the relevance of evaluation criteria among health information seekers on the Internet[J]. Journal of Health Psychology, 2003, 8(1): 71-82.
[57] Goodrum A, Pope R, Godo E, et al. Newsblog relevance: Applying relevance criteria to news-related blogs[J]. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 47(1): 1-2.
[58] 童迎, 李鹏, 夏慧. 合作信息查寻与检索相关性判据的探索性因子分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013, 57(19): 30-36.
[59] Schamber L. Time-line interviews and inductive content analysis:Their effectiveness for exploring cognitive behaviors[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 2000, 51(8): 734-744.
[60] Case D O. Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs and behavior[M]. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing, 2012. |