国外图书馆联盟信息资源建设制度研究进展(2005-2014)

doi:10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.15.017

图书情报工作 ›› 2015, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (15): 122-132.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.15.017

国外图书馆联盟信息资源建设制度研究进展(2005-2014)

裴成发, 温芳芳

山西大学经济与管理学院太原 030006

收稿日期:2015-06-27 修回日期:2015-07-16 出版日期:2015-08-05 发布日期:2015-08-05
作者简介:温芳芳(ORCID:0000-0002-2022-9764),助理馆员,硕士研究生,E-mail:wenfangf@126.com;裴成发(ORCID:0000-0001-9149-6475),教授,硕士生导师
基金资助:
本文系国家社会科学基金项目"基于信息生态的信息资源协同建设研究"(项目编号:14BTQ039)研究成果之一。

Research Progress on Development Institution of Information Resources of Library Consortium Abroad (2005-2014)

Pei Chengfa, Wen Fangfang

School of Economics and Management, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006

Received:2015-06-27 Revised:2015-07-16 Online:2015-08-05 Published:2015-08-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

[目的/意义]揭示2005-2014年国外图书馆联盟信息资源建设制度研究的内容,为我国该主题的研究提供借鉴。[方法/过程]采用文献调研方法,从信息资源采集、组织、保存和共享4个方面分析该主题研究现状。[结果/结论]研究发现:国外研究重视联盟资源建设的顶层设计;将合作性的馆藏规划和馆藏发展政策的研究置于重要地位;研究立足于更广阔的视野。未来的研究应注重:开展联盟资源建设制度的系统性研究;理论界、业界与政府进行三方合作,探索联盟资源建设的地区、国家和国际框架;因时制宜、因地制宜地发展联盟资源建设制度。

关键词: 图书馆联盟, 信息资源建设, 馆藏发展

Abstract:

[Purpose/significance] The study aims to explore the research contents of development institution of information resources of library consortium abroad, to provide reference for the theory and practice research about such topic in China. [Method/process] By means of literature survey, research progress on four main topics ofcollection, organization, preservation and sharing are revealed. [Result/conclusion] Three distinct enlightenments of the research are revealed: library consortiums abroad emphasis on top level design of information resources development, put highlight on the research of cooperative collection planning and collection development policy,and research based on broader perspective.Main points should be focused on in the future studies: carrying out a systematic study on the development institution of information resources, exploringthe regional, national and international frameworks of information resource development through the tripartite cooperation of theorists, practitioners and government,developing the development institution of information resource with the change of time and space.

Key words: library consortium, information resources development, collection development

中图分类号:

G250

裴成发, 温芳芳. 国外图书馆联盟信息资源建设制度研究进展(2005-2014)[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015, 59(15): 122-132.

Pei Chengfa, Wen Fangfang. Research Progress on Development Institution of Information Resources of Library Consortium Abroad (2005-2014)[J]. LIS, 2015, 59(15): 122-132.

参考文献

[1] Wu M M. Building a collaborative digital collection: A necessary evolution in libraries [J]. Law Library Journal, 2011, 103(4): 527-551.
[2] 戴龙基, 张红扬. 图书馆联盟——实现资源共享和互利互惠的组织形式[J].大学图书馆学报, 2000(3):36-39.
[3] Demas S, Miller M E. Rethinking collection management plans: Shaping collective collections for the 21stcentury[J]. Collective Management, 2012, 37(3/4):168-187.
[4] Urquhart C J, Cox A M, Spink S. Collaboration on procurement of e-content between the National Health Service and higher education in the UK[J]. Interlending & Document Supply, 2007, 35(7): 164-170.
[5] Ball D. Public libraries and the consortium purchase of electronic resources[J]. The Electronic Library, 2003, 21(4): 301-309.
[6] Missingham R. Electronic Resources Australia: A national approach to purchasing[J]. Library Management, 2009, 30(6/7): 444-453.
[7] Vogel K D. Integrating electronic resources into collection development policies[J]. Collection Management, 1996, 21(2):65-76.
[8] Olorunsola A, Adeleke A A. Electronic journals in Nigerian university libraries: The present situation and future possibilities [J]. Library Review, 2011, 60(7): 588-598.
[9] Johnson S, Evensen O G, Gelfand J, et al. Key issues for e-resource collection development: A guide for libraries[EB/OL]. [2015-04-05].http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/acquisition-collection-development/publications/IFLA_ELECTRONIC_RESOURCE_GUIDE_DRAFT%20FOR%20COMMENT.pdf.
[10] Horava T. Today and in perpetuity: A Canadian consortial strategy for owning and hosting ebooks[J]. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2013, 39: 423-428.
[11] Zhang Mei, Eschenfelder K R. License analysis of e-journal perpetual access[J]. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2014, 40: 62-69.
[12] Davis K, Jin Lie, Neely C, et al. Shared patron-driven acquisition within a consortium: The OCUL PDA pilot[J]. Serials Review, 2012, 38(3): 183-187.
[13] Jill E, Bonnie P. The demand driven acquisitions pilot project by the Orbis Cascade Alliance: An interview with members of the demand driven acquisitions implementation team[J]. Serials Review, 2012, 38(2): 132-136.
[14] Doyle G. Oregon Cascade Alliance demand driven acquisitions ebook pilot[EB/OL]. [2015-04-24].http://ala12.scheduler.ala.org/files/ala12/Doyle%20-%20Demand%20Driven%20Acquisitions.pdf.
[15] Shepherd J, Langston M. Shared patron driven acquisition of e-books in the California State University Library Consortium[J]. Library Collections Acquisitions & Technical Services, 2013, 37(1/2): 34-41.
[16] Wiley L, Clarage E. Building on success: Evolving local and consortium purchase-on-demand programs[J]. Interlending & Document Supply, 2012, 40(2): 105-110.
[17] Warner A. EBASS 25, Work package 5 - Procurement guidelines[EB/OL]. [2015-04-24].https://repository.royalholloway.ac.uk/file/5b85dab5-7bf4-7c7b-7731-b552f029e4ae/1/EBASS%2025%20Work%20Package%205%20Procurement%20Guidelines.pdf.
[18] Ebrary. Boston Library Consortium chooses ebrary and YBP library services for patron driven acquisition e-book pilot[EB/OL]. [2015-04-24].http://www.ebrary.com/corp/newspdf/ebrary_YBP_BLC.pdf.
[19] Carrico S, Shelton T. A real challenge: Incorporating patron-driven acquisitions programs into collection development strategies and budgets[EB/OL]. [2015-04-24].http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/charleston/2012/Collection/6/.
[20] Wiley L, Chrzastowski T E. A domestic monograph collection assessment in Illinois academic libraries: What are we buying and how is it used?[J]Interlending & Document Supply, 2011, 39(4): 167-175.
[21] Sarah P.The principle and the pragmatist: On conflict and coalescence for librarian engagement with open access initiatives[J]. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2013, 39(1): 67-75.
[22] Cimen E. Future of resource sharing in Turkey: Can open access be an alternative?[J].Interlending & Document Supply, 2012, 40(3): 144-149.
[23] Karacsony G. HUNOR: The collaboration of Hungarian open access repositories[J]. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013, 73: 57-61.
[24] Johnson P C. International open access week at small to medium U.S. academic libraries: The first five years[J]. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2014, 40: 626-631.
[25] Ahmed M H, Suleiman R J. Academic library consortium in Jordan: An evaluation study [J]. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2013, 39(2): 138-143.
[26] Chand P, Chauhan S K. The union catalogue of academic libraries in India: An initiative by INFLIBNET[J].Interlending & Document Supply, 2008, 36(3): 142-148.
[27] Hulse B, Cheverie J F, Dygert C T. ALADIN Research Commons: A consortial institutional repository[J]. OCLC Systems & Services: International Digital Library Perspectives, 2007, 23(2): 158-169.
[28] Payne L. Library storage facilities and the future of print collections in North America[EB/OL]. [2015-04-04]. http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/library/2007/2007-01.pdf.
[29] Revitt M, Guthro C. Together we are stronger: A cooperative approach to managing print collections[EB/OL]. [2015-04-05].http://library.ifla.org/77/.
[30] Maskell C, Soutter J, Oldenburg K. Collaborative print repositories: A case study of library directors' views[J]. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2010, 36(3): 242-249.
[31] Malpas C.RLG partnership shared print collections working group shared print policyreview report[EB/OL]. [2015-04-05]. http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/library/2009/2009-03.pdf.
[32] Demas S. Curating collective collections — Policies for shared print programs: Questions to address in writing a Memorandum of understanding (MOU)[J]. Against the Grain, 2014, 26(1): 72-73.
[33] Demas S.Curating collective collections — Policies for shared print programs: Emerging shared print policy choices as reflected in MOU's[J].Against the Grain, 2014, 26 (2): 87-88.
[34] Demas S.Curating collective collections — Policies for shared print programs: Thoughts on future coordination[J]. Against the Grain, 2014, 26 (2): 80-82.
[35] Reilly B F Jr. Preserving American print resources[J].Library Management, 2005, 26(1/2): 102-105.
[36] Walters T O, Skinner K. Economics, sustainability, and the cooperative model in digital preservation[J].Library Hi Tech, 2010, 28(2): 259-272.
[37] Nancy Y M. Aligning national approaches to digital preservation [EB/OL].[2015-05-05]. http://educopia.org/sites/educopia.org/files/publications/Aligning_National_Approaches_to_Digital_Preservation.pdf.
[38] Reilly B F Jr. The future of cooperative collections and repositories: A case study of the Center for Research Libraries[J]. Library Management, 2013, 34(4-5): 342-351.
[39] Trehub A, Wilson T C. Keeping it simple: The Alabama Digital Preservation Network (ADPNet)[J]. Library Hi Tech, 2010, 28(2): 245-258.
[40] Posner B, Simpson E. The Rethinking Resource Sharing Initiative: Education, advocacy and inspiration for libraries[J]. Interlending & Document Supply, 2011, 39(3): 142-147.
[41] Ilesanmi T C. Library consortium: IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria experience [J]. Interlending & Document Supply, 2012, 40(4):187-191.
[42] Smart C A, Stewart-Fullerton C. Exploration of an e-resources consortium in Jamaica: An initial examination and tentative suggestions for the future[J]. Advances in Librarianship, 2014, 37:243-268.
[43] Mangiaracina S, Zaetta M, Matteis D D, et al. NILDE: Developing a new generation tool for document delivery in Italy[J]. Interlending & Document Supply, 2008, 36(3): 167-177.
[44] 张冉. 非营利组织管理[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社, 2014:56.
[45] Taole N, Dick A L. Implementing a common library system for the Lesotho Library Consortium[J].The Electronic Library, 2009, 27(1): 5-19.
[46] Golder M, Birch K. Resource sharing in a cloud computing age[J]. Interlending & Document Supply, 2012, 40(1): 4-11.
[47] MacKeigan C. The future of interoperability for ILL and resource sharing[J].Interlending & Document Supply, 2014, 42(2/3): 105-108.
[48] Sanville T. OhioLINK: A US resource sharing facility -Issues and development[J]. Interlending & Document Supply, 2007, 35(1): 31-37.
[49] Bailey-Hainer B, Beaubien A, Posner B, et al. Rethinking library resource sharing: New models for collaboration[J].Interlending & Document Supply, 2014, 42(1): 7-12.

国外图书馆联盟信息资源建设制度研究进展(2005-2014)

Research Progress on Development Institution of Information Resources of Library Consortium Abroad (2005-2014)

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	宋姬芳. 以信息资源建设助推大学图书馆"十四五"知识服务能力提升——以中国人民大学图书馆为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(5): 63-71.
[2]	邵波, 王怡. 基于下一代图书馆服务平台的高校图书馆区域联盟重构研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(1): 68-74.
[3]	张康, 李卓卓, 苗淼儿. 从合作馆藏到集体馆藏的探索:法明顿计划80年后的审思[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(20): 31-41.
[4]	徐青梅, 陶蕊, 叶继元. 数字资源与电子资源:概念辨析及术语规范探讨[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(18): 3-14.
[5]	林芳, 孙巍, 张学福. 勤思善学笃行致远——孟连生在图书情报领域的实践研究及学术影响[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(15): 36-43.
[6]	郭晶. 赋能存量做优增量把握变量——面向“十四五”的国内高校图书馆文献信息资源建设思考[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(1): 47-54.
[7]	肖希明, 石庆功, 刘奕. 信息资源建设:“十三五”回望与“十四五”前瞻[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(1): 55-63.
[8]	李朝阳, 冯琳, 高波. 中外图书馆联盟经费管理模式比较研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(19): 3-14.
[9]	戴晓翔, 刘敏榕. 图书馆联盟开展跨界疫情应急服务的探索与思考——以福建省高校数字图书馆联盟(FULink)为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(15): 12-16.
[10]	邝婉玲, 高波. 国外图书馆联盟组织管理模式研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(9): 116-126.
[11]	张玲, 牛爱菊, 黄燕云. 基于部分成员馆现状的CASHL运行发展策略思考[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(5): 61-67.
[12]	肖珑. 推动图书馆共建共享可持续发展的新成果——读《中国跨系统区域图书馆联盟建设与发展实证研究》[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(12): 146-148.
[13]	丁培, 叶兰, 陈大庆. 图书馆联盟数字资源使用统计研究——以JUSP为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(6): 61-68.
[14]	黄飞燕, 卢正明, 周绿涛, 周嘉颖. 国外图书馆联盟印本馆藏分析的比较研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(5): 140-148.
[15]	赵乃瑄, 冯君. 美国区域图书馆联盟运行现状研究与启示[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(7): 6-11.