[1] Wu M M. Building a collaborative digital collection: A necessary evolution in libraries [J]. Law Library Journal, 2011, 103(4): 527-551.
[2] 戴龙基, 张红扬. 图书馆联盟——实现资源共享和互利互惠的组织形式[J].大学图书馆学报, 2000(3):36-39.
[3] Demas S, Miller M E. Rethinking collection management plans: Shaping collective collections for the 21stcentury[J]. Collective Management, 2012, 37(3/4):168-187.
[4] Urquhart C J, Cox A M, Spink S. Collaboration on procurement of e-content between the National Health Service and higher education in the UK[J]. Interlending & Document Supply, 2007, 35(7): 164-170.
[5] Ball D. Public libraries and the consortium purchase of electronic resources[J]. The Electronic Library, 2003, 21(4): 301-309.
[6] Missingham R. Electronic Resources Australia: A national approach to purchasing[J]. Library Management, 2009, 30(6/7): 444-453.
[7] Vogel K D. Integrating electronic resources into collection development policies[J]. Collection Management, 1996, 21(2):65-76.
[8] Olorunsola A, Adeleke A A. Electronic journals in Nigerian university libraries: The present situation and future possibilities [J]. Library Review, 2011, 60(7): 588-598.
[9] Johnson S, Evensen O G, Gelfand J, et al. Key issues for e-resource collection development: A guide for libraries[EB/OL]. [2015-04-05].http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/acquisition-collection-development/publications/IFLA_ELECTRONIC_RESOURCE_GUIDE_DRAFT%20FOR%20COMMENT.pdf.
[10] Horava T. Today and in perpetuity: A Canadian consortial strategy for owning and hosting ebooks[J]. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2013, 39: 423-428.
[11] Zhang Mei, Eschenfelder K R. License analysis of e-journal perpetual access[J]. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2014, 40: 62-69.
[12] Davis K, Jin Lie, Neely C, et al. Shared patron-driven acquisition within a consortium: The OCUL PDA pilot[J]. Serials Review, 2012, 38(3): 183-187.
[13] Jill E, Bonnie P. The demand driven acquisitions pilot project by the Orbis Cascade Alliance: An interview with members of the demand driven acquisitions implementation team[J]. Serials Review, 2012, 38(2): 132-136.
[14] Doyle G. Oregon Cascade Alliance demand driven acquisitions ebook pilot[EB/OL]. [2015-04-24].http://ala12.scheduler.ala.org/files/ala12/Doyle%20-%20Demand%20Driven%20Acquisitions.pdf.
[15] Shepherd J, Langston M. Shared patron driven acquisition of e-books in the California State University Library Consortium[J]. Library Collections Acquisitions & Technical Services, 2013, 37(1/2): 34-41.
[16] Wiley L, Clarage E. Building on success: Evolving local and consortium purchase-on-demand programs[J]. Interlending & Document Supply, 2012, 40(2): 105-110.
[17] Warner A. EBASS 25, Work package 5 - Procurement guidelines[EB/OL]. [2015-04-24].https://repository.royalholloway.ac.uk/file/5b85dab5-7bf4-7c7b-7731-b552f029e4ae/1/EBASS%2025%20Work%20Package%205%20Procurement%20Guidelines.pdf.
[18] Ebrary. Boston Library Consortium chooses ebrary and YBP library services for patron driven acquisition e-book pilot[EB/OL]. [2015-04-24].http://www.ebrary.com/corp/newspdf/ebrary_YBP_BLC.pdf.
[19] Carrico S, Shelton T. A real challenge: Incorporating patron-driven acquisitions programs into collection development strategies and budgets[EB/OL]. [2015-04-24].http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/charleston/2012/Collection/6/.
[20] Wiley L, Chrzastowski T E. A domestic monograph collection assessment in Illinois academic libraries: What are we buying and how is it used?[J]Interlending & Document Supply, 2011, 39(4): 167-175.
[21] Sarah P.The principle and the pragmatist: On conflict and coalescence for librarian engagement with open access initiatives[J]. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2013, 39(1): 67-75.
[22] Cimen E. Future of resource sharing in Turkey: Can open access be an alternative?[J].Interlending & Document Supply, 2012, 40(3): 144-149.
[23] Karacsony G. HUNOR: The collaboration of Hungarian open access repositories[J]. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013, 73: 57-61.
[24] Johnson P C. International open access week at small to medium U.S. academic libraries: The first five years[J]. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2014, 40: 626-631.
[25] Ahmed M H, Suleiman R J. Academic library consortium in Jordan: An evaluation study [J]. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2013, 39(2): 138-143.
[26] Chand P, Chauhan S K. The union catalogue of academic libraries in India: An initiative by INFLIBNET[J].Interlending & Document Supply, 2008, 36(3): 142-148.
[27] Hulse B, Cheverie J F, Dygert C T. ALADIN Research Commons: A consortial institutional repository[J]. OCLC Systems & Services: International Digital Library Perspectives, 2007, 23(2): 158-169.
[28] Payne L. Library storage facilities and the future of print collections in North America[EB/OL]. [2015-04-04]. http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/library/2007/2007-01.pdf.
[29] Revitt M, Guthro C. Together we are stronger: A cooperative approach to managing print collections[EB/OL]. [2015-04-05].http://library.ifla.org/77/.
[30] Maskell C, Soutter J, Oldenburg K. Collaborative print repositories: A case study of library directors' views[J]. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2010, 36(3): 242-249.
[31] Malpas C.RLG partnership shared print collections working group shared print policyreview report[EB/OL]. [2015-04-05]. http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/library/2009/2009-03.pdf.
[32] Demas S. Curating collective collections — Policies for shared print programs: Questions to address in writing a Memorandum of understanding (MOU)[J]. Against the Grain, 2014, 26(1): 72-73.
[33] Demas S.Curating collective collections — Policies for shared print programs: Emerging shared print policy choices as reflected in MOU's[J].Against the Grain, 2014, 26 (2): 87-88.
[34] Demas S.Curating collective collections — Policies for shared print programs: Thoughts on future coordination[J]. Against the Grain, 2014, 26 (2): 80-82.
[35] Reilly B F Jr. Preserving American print resources[J].Library Management, 2005, 26(1/2): 102-105.
[36] Walters T O, Skinner K. Economics, sustainability, and the cooperative model in digital preservation[J].Library Hi Tech, 2010, 28(2): 259-272.
[37] Nancy Y M. Aligning national approaches to digital preservation [EB/OL].[2015-05-05]. http://educopia.org/sites/educopia.org/files/publications/Aligning_National_Approaches_to_Digital_Preservation.pdf.
[38] Reilly B F Jr. The future of cooperative collections and repositories: A case study of the Center for Research Libraries[J]. Library Management, 2013, 34(4-5): 342-351.
[39] Trehub A, Wilson T C. Keeping it simple: The Alabama Digital Preservation Network (ADPNet)[J]. Library Hi Tech, 2010, 28(2): 245-258.
[40] Posner B, Simpson E. The Rethinking Resource Sharing Initiative: Education, advocacy and inspiration for libraries[J]. Interlending & Document Supply, 2011, 39(3): 142-147.
[41] Ilesanmi T C. Library consortium: IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria experience [J]. Interlending & Document Supply, 2012, 40(4):187-191.
[42] Smart C A, Stewart-Fullerton C. Exploration of an e-resources consortium in Jamaica: An initial examination and tentative suggestions for the future[J]. Advances in Librarianship, 2014, 37:243-268.
[43] Mangiaracina S, Zaetta M, Matteis D D, et al. NILDE: Developing a new generation tool for document delivery in Italy[J]. Interlending & Document Supply, 2008, 36(3): 167-177.
[44] 张冉. 非营利组织管理[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社, 2014:56.
[45] Taole N, Dick A L. Implementing a common library system for the Lesotho Library Consortium[J].The Electronic Library, 2009, 27(1): 5-19.
[46] Golder M, Birch K. Resource sharing in a cloud computing age[J]. Interlending & Document Supply, 2012, 40(1): 4-11.
[47] MacKeigan C. The future of interoperability for ILL and resource sharing[J].Interlending & Document Supply, 2014, 42(2/3): 105-108.
[48] Sanville T. OhioLINK: A US resource sharing facility -Issues and development[J]. Interlending & Document Supply, 2007, 35(1): 31-37.
[49] Bailey-Hainer B, Beaubien A, Posner B, et al. Rethinking library resource sharing: New models for collaboration[J].Interlending & Document Supply, 2014, 42(1): 7-12. |