图书情报工作 ›› 2015, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (24): 123-130,101.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.24.018

• 综述述评 • 上一篇    下一篇

图书馆评估研究进展综述

宫平1,2, 孙宇3, 杜辉2, 贾东琴4   

  1. 1. 南开大学商学院 天津 300071;
    2. 沈阳师范大学图书馆 沈阳 110034;
    3. 青岛远洋船员职业学院图书馆 青岛 266071;
    4. 天津工业大学图书馆 天津 300387
  • 收稿日期:2015-11-06 修回日期:2015-12-06 出版日期:2015-12-20 发布日期:2015-12-20
  • 作者简介:宫平(ORCID:0000-0003-2623-5783),馆员,博士研究生,E-mail:gongping418@163.com;孙宇(ORCID:0000-0002-4034-2828),馆员;杜辉(ORCID:0000-0001-7952-9748),馆员,硕士;贾东琴(ORCID:0000-0003-3958-2506),馆员,博士。
  • 基金资助:

    本文系国家社会科学基金青年项目"面向2020的我国图书馆战略执行力模型与实证研究"(项目编号:15CTQ003)研究成果之一。

Review on the Study of Library Evaluation

Gong Ping1,2, Sun Yu3, Du Hui2, Jia Dongqin4   

  1. 1. Business School of NanKai University, Tianjin 300071;
    2. Library of Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang 110034;
    3. Qingdao Oceanshipping Mariners College, Qingdao 266071;
    4. Library of Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianjin 300387
  • Received:2015-11-06 Revised:2015-12-06 Online:2015-12-20 Published:2015-12-20

摘要:

[目的/意义]总结国内外图书馆评估研究现状,为我国图书馆评估理论研究与实践工作提供参考。[方法/过程]从评估基本理论、评估主体、评估内容、评估体系与指标、评估方法5个方面对国内外图书馆评估研究进行全面梳理与评述,并提出图书馆评估未来发展方向。[结果/结论]从研究内容看,国外评估主体多元化,国内评估主体单一;国外评估内容由绩效评估转向成效评估,而国内依然注重投入评估;国外评估方法呈现综合化趋势,国内则以定性方法为主;国外广泛采用国际标准进行评估,而国内评估指标缺乏标准化和规范化。从研究类型看,评估理论研究方面有大量关于引进国外评估方法和成功案例的介绍,而实践应用研究略显不足。

关键词: 图书馆评估, 评估指标体系, 评估方法

Abstract:

[Purpose/significance] This study aims to summarize the research status of library evaluation, and to provide the basis and thinking from the international research for Chinese research.[Method/process] This paper comprehensively reviewed the domestic and foreign library evaluation researches from fiveaspects including the basic theory, the individual assessment, the comprehensive assessment, the assessment system and index, the assessment method, and put forward the future development direction of library evaluation.[Result/conclusion] In terms of research contents, the foreign evaluation is diversified, while the domestic evaluation is unitary. The focus of the foreign evaluation changes from performance to effect, and the domestic evaluation emphasizes input. As for the evaluation method, it tends to be comprehensive abroad, but we still mainly use the qualitative method. Besides, the international standard is adopted in the foreign evaluation, but the domestic evaluation index lacks standards and regulation. From the perspective of research types, lots of descriptions of introducing foreign evaluation methods and successful cases appear in the aspect of evaluation theory research, but the practical applied research is not fully made.

Key words: library evaluation, evaluation index system, evaluation method

中图分类号: