图书情报工作 ›› 2016, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (12): 124-129.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2016.12.018

• 情报研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于BKCI的图书半衰期分析——以图书情报学学科为例

宋雯斐1, 刘晓娟2   

  1. 1. 浙江工业职业技术学院数字媒体与信息工程分院 绍兴 312000;
    2. 北京师范大学政府管理学院 北京 100875
  • 收稿日期:2016-05-23 修回日期:2016-06-12 出版日期:2016-06-20 发布日期:2016-06-20
  • 作者简介:宋雯斐(ORCID:0000-0001-7520-0638),副教授,E-mail:song_wenfei@126.com;刘晓娟(ORCID:0000-0002-5727-733X),副教授,硕士生导师
  • 基金资助:
    本文系ISTIC-THOMSON REUTERS科学计量学联合实验室开放基金项目“多维度学术著作评价指标研究”项目编号:SKHX2016034和绍兴市高层次人才国境内外进修项目研究成果之一。

Analysis of Book Half-life Based on BKCI: Taking the Library Science & Information Science for Example

Song Wenfei1, Liu Xiaojuan2   

  1. 1. School of Digital Media and Information Engineering, Zhejiang Industry Polytechnic College, Shaoxing 312000;
    2. School of Government, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
  • Received:2016-05-23 Revised:2016-06-12 Online:2016-06-20 Published:2016-06-20

摘要: [目的/意义] 为探索图书的老化速度与引文特征,更客观地评价图书的学术价值和利用规律。[方法/过程] 对汤森路透WoS平台中图书引文索引(Book Citation Index)中2012-2014年间的图书情报学学科图书的引文数据进行引用半衰期、被引半衰期的计量,并与WoS中该学科的期刊引文半衰期、被引半衰期做分析比较。[结果/结论] 对比结果显示,该学科图书引用半衰期大于期刊引用半衰期,图书被引半衰期要小于期刊被引半衰期,并从图书的引文和被引规律分析造成这种差异的原因。

关键词: 图书引文半衰期, 图书引用半衰期, BKCI

Abstract: [Purpose/significance] This paper aims to explore the obsolescence and citation features of books, and evaluate the academic value and utilization laws of books more objectively.[Method/process] The paper captures the citation data of the books in the field of LIS (Library and Information Science) during the year from 2012 to 2014 on the Book Citation Index, measures the citing half-life and cited half-life, and compares with the journal of the same discipline.[Result/conclusion] This paper draws a conclusion that the book citing half-life is longer than journal, and the book cited half-life is shorter than journal. Finally, it analyses the reason which causes the difference between book citing and cited.

Key words: book citing half-life, book cited half-life, BKCI

中图分类号: