图书情报工作 ›› 2016, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (22): 102-108.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2016.22.015

• 情报研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

理工类院校科研水平与学术支撑能力比较研究——以上海市6所应用技术型大学为例

常峥斌1, 吴珞1, 吴贝贝1, 张必毅1, 常青2   

  1. 1. 上海第二工业大学图书馆 上海 201209;
    2. 浙江农林大学图书馆 杭州 311300
  • 收稿日期:2016-08-02 修回日期:2016-10-11 出版日期:2016-11-20 发布日期:2016-11-20
  • 通讯作者: 常青(ORCID:0000-0001-5131-3515),技术部主任,副研究馆员,通讯作者,E-mail:lacqzh@zafu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:常峥斌,副馆长,副研究馆员;吴珞,馆长,教授;吴贝贝,助理馆员;张必毅,本科生。
  • 基金资助:

    本文系上海第二工业大学科研启动基金项目(项目编号:EGD16XQD17)研究成果之一。

Comparative Study on the Scientific Research Level and the Academic Support Capacity of Universities of Science and Technology——Cases on 6 Applied Technology Universities in Shanghai

Chang Zhengbin1, Wu Luo1, Wu Beibei1, Zhang Biyi1, Chang Qing2   

  1. 1. Library of Shanghai Polytechnic University, Shanghai 201209;
    2. Zhejiang A & F University Library, Hangzhou 311300
  • Received:2016-08-02 Revised:2016-10-11 Online:2016-11-20 Published:2016-11-20

摘要:

[目的/意义]了解上海市6所应用技术型大学的科研学术水平和学术支撑能力,以更有效地提升理工类院校教学科研水平,发挥理工类院校对地区发展的推动作用。[方法/过程]采用文献计量学方法,以Web of Science收录的科研论文数据为依据,从被引次数、学科分布、作者分布、国际合作等角度,对上海市6所理工类高校近年来的科研论文产出情况进行统计分析。[结果/结论]开展对上海市6所理工类高校,基于文献计量的科研水平评价工作,不仅是为了了解6所理工类院校的科研学术水平及研究方向,更希望通过分析评价,进一步了解科研学术水平对学校学科发展的帮助与支撑关系,为我校学科专业设置及未来学科发展定位等提供借鉴。

关键词: 文献计量, 学术支撑能力, 科研评价, 学术评价

Abstract:

[Purpose/significance] Universities of science and technology are important education resources which support natural science and engineering technology application in certain areas. Shanghai is the leader in reform and opening, Therefore, understanding the scientific research level and the academic support capacity of universities of science and technology in Shanghai has important significance.[Method/process] With bibliometric methods, based on the dataset of Web of Science, we analyzed the paper output of colleges above in terms of citation, discipline distribution, author distribution and international cooperation.[Result/conclusion] The evaluation of scientific research level in colleges and universities based on bibliometric methods is impartial and objective, and needs further discussion about the academic support capacity.

Key words: bibliometric statistical, analysisacademicsupport capacity, scientific research evaluation, academic evaluation

中图分类号: