主题词组合新颖性与论文学术影响力的关系研究

doi:10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.09.011

图书情报工作 ›› 2017, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (9): 87-93.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.09.011

主题词组合新颖性与论文学术影响力的关系研究

任海英^1,2, 王德营^1,2, 王菲菲^1,2

1. 北京工业大学经济与管理学院北京 100124;
2. 北京现代制造业发展研究基地北京 100124

收稿日期:2017-02-23 修回日期:2017-04-22 出版日期:2017-05-05 发布日期:2017-05-05
通讯作者: 王德营(ORCID:0000-0002-4626-9772),硕士研究生,通讯作者,E-mail:wangdy9217@163.com
作者简介:任海英(ORCID:0000-0002-1197-6709),副教授,博士;王菲菲(ORCID:0000-0002-1717-9719),副教授,博士。
基金资助:
本文系北京市自然科学基金预探索项目“发明过程和机理的概念地图表示研究”（项目编号：9153020）和国家社会科学青年基金项目“基于多维信息计量分析的学术影响力综合评价研究”（项目编号：15CTQ023）研究成果之一。

Relationship Between Novelty of Key-Term Combinations and Papers' Scientific Impact

Ren Haiying^1,2, Wang Deying^1,2, Wang Feifei^1,2

1. Research Base of Beijing Modern Manufacturing Development, Beijing 100124;
2. College of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124

Received:2017-02-23 Revised:2017-04-22 Online:2017-05-05 Published:2017-05-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的/意义] 研究学术论文内容的组合新颖性与其学术影响力的关系，为研究论文的学术影响力提供新的研究视角。[方法/过程] 采用文本挖掘方法对论文题目、摘要和关键词中的主题词进行提取，通过构建领域主题词共现网络，为每篇论文设计了新颖组合率、中等组合率和常规组合率3个指标，将领域论文划分为不同的新颖性/常规性类型，然后对不同类型论文中高被引论文所占的比例进行统计分析。[结果/结论] 同时具有主题词组合高新颖性和高常规性特点的论文成为高被引论文的几率显著高于其他类型的论文，因此建议研究者在科学研究中应注重新颖知识与常规知识的适当组合。

关键词: 主题词, 组合新颖性, 被引频次, 共现网络

Abstract: [Purpose/significance] We study the combinational novelty of academic papers' contents, providing a new perspective for research in academic impact.[Method/process] We apply text mining methods for extracting key-terms in the title, abstract and keywords part of all papers in a particular research field, and design three indicators-novel, medium and conventional combination rates for each paper by constructing a key-term co-occurrence network. Then we divide all papers into different novelty/convention combination types, and analyze the proportion of highly cited papers for different combination types.[Result/conclusion] We find that papers of high novelty and high conventionality have a significantly higher probability of becoming highly cited papers than other types of papers. The results imply that researchers should seek appropriate combination of novel and conventional knowledge in the process of scientific research.

Key words: key-term, combinational novelty, citation frequency, co-occurrence network

中图分类号:

G305

任海英, 王德营, 王菲菲. 主题词组合新颖性与论文学术影响力的关系研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(9): 87-93.

Ren Haiying, Wang Deying, Wang Feifei. Relationship Between Novelty of Key-Term Combinations and Papers' Scientific Impact[J]. LIS, 2017, 61(9): 87-93.

参考文献

[1] HENDERSON R M, CLARK K B. Architectural innovation:the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms[J]. Administrative science quarterly, 1990, 35(1):9-30.
[2] WHITESIDE D T. The mathematical principles underlying Newton's Principia Mathematica[J]. Journal for the history of astronomy, 1971, 1(2):116-138.
[3] MUKHERJEE S, UZZI B, JONES B, et al. A new method for identifying recombinations of existing knowledge associated with high-impact innovation[J]. Journal of product innovation management, 2016, 33(2):224-236.
[4] TAHAMTAN I, AFSHAR A S, AHAMDZADEH K. Factors affecting number of citations:a comprehensive review of the literature[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 107(3):1-31.
[5] SCHILLING M A, GREEN E. Recombinant search and breakthrough idea generation:an analysis of high impact papers in the social sciences[J]. Research policy, 2011, 40(10):1321-1331.
[6] UZZI B, JONES B. Atypical combinations and scientific impact[J]. Science, 2013, 342(6157):468-472.
[7] BOYACK K W, KLAVANS R. Atypical combinations are confounded by disciplinary effects[C]//International conference on science and technology indicators.Leiden:Universiteit Leiden, 2014:64-71.
[8] YEGROS-YEGROS A, RAFOLS I, D'ESTE P. Does interdisciplinary research lead to higher citation impact? The different effect of proximal and distal interdisciplinarity[J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10(8):e0135095. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0135095.
[9] NONAKA I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation[J]. Organization science, 2009, 11(1):833-845.
[10] FAGERBERG J, MOWERY D C, NELSON R R. The Oxford handbook of innovation[M]. Oxford:Oxford University press, 2005.
[11] YOUN H, STRUMSKY D, BETTENCOURT L M A, et al. Invention as a combinatorial process:evidence from US patents[EB/OL].[2016-10-23].https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4424706/.
[12] MACK C A. How to write a good scientific paper:title, abstract, and keywords[J]. Journal of micro/nanolithography mems & moems, 2012, 11(2):242-248.
[13] COULTER N, MONARCH I, KONDA S. Software engineering as seen through its research literature:a study in co-word analysis[J]. Journal of the association for information science and technology, 1998, 49(13):1206-1223.
[14] HU J, ZHANG Y. Research patterns and trends of recommendation system in China using co-word analysis[J]. Information processing & management, 2015, 88(4):329-339.
[15] HONG Y, YAO Q, YANG Y, et al. Knowledge structure and theme trends analysis on general practitioner research:a co-word perspective[J]. BMC family practice, 2016, 17(1):1-15.
[16] 刘雪立. 基于Web of Science和ESI数据库高被引论文的界定方法[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2012, 23(6):975-978.
[17] 齐青. Web of Science的检索和应用[J]. 图书馆工作与研究, 2013(2):110-112.
[18] NAYAK P C, SUDHEER K P, RANGAN D M, et al. A neuro-fuzzy computing technique for modeling hydrological time series[J]. Journal of hydrology, 2004, 291(1-2):52-66.

主题词组合新颖性与论文学术影响力的关系研究

Relationship Between Novelty of Key-Term Combinations and Papers' Scientific Impact

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	秦成磊, 韩茹雪, 周昊旻, 仲江涛, 章成志. 同行评审意见类型识别及其在不同被引频次下的分布研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(13): 102-117.
[2]	伍军红, 肖宏, 任美亚, 冯士雍, 丁哲. PCSI:一种单篇论文被引频次标准化方法[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(23): 22-30.
[3]	罗文馨, 赵亚娟. 专利被引频次的时间影响研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(9): 47-60.
[4]	于丰畅, 陆伟. 关键词共现网络视角下的学科基础词汇发现[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(9): 95-100.
[5]	马捷, 谢雨杉, 蒲泓宇, 张云开. 智慧政务局部近邻网络节点脆弱性研究——以深圳市政府在线为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(15): 13-22.
[6]	李秀霞, 宋凯. STCF值:基于研究主题的学术文献影响力评价新指标[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(20): 88-94.
[7]	龙艺璇, 赵庆峰, 赵星辉. Q指数——一种考虑了时间因素的新型h指数[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(7): 91-95.
[8]	郭斐, 鄢小燕. 睡美人文献识别方法分析与改进构想[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(8): 93-98.
[9]	杨超, 朱东华, 衡晓帆, 汪雪锋. 基于语法树的SAO结构识别方法研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(21): 113-121.
[10]	隋桂玲, 吕红梅, 刘晓峰, 王剑. 高校图书馆量化评估专业期刊需求程度和保障水平的研究——以吉林大学哲学专业为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(11): 68-74.
[11]	张云, 华薇娜, 袁顺波. 利用引文确定领域关键文献的方法探析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(1): 66-73,82.
[12]	隗玲, 许海云, 郭婷, 方曙. 基于弱共现和突发监测的情报学学科研究主题及交叉性分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015, 59(21): 105-114.
[13]	张悦悦, 许鑫. 基于主题词表的亚健康人群食疗知识库设计与构建[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015, 59(14): 6-14.
[14]	叶春蕾, 邢燕丽. 基于LDA和社会网络中心度的研究生个性化检索推荐模型研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015, 59(13): 104-110.
[15]	贾君枝, 张宁. 教育领域主题词与Delicious中的标签对比研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(21): 125-129,135.