结合时间切片信息的作者共引分析方法与实证

doi:10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.16.018

图书情报工作 ›› 2017, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (16): 135-142.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.16.018

结合时间切片信息的作者共引分析方法与实证

黄文彬¹, 王冰璐¹, 步一², 王煜晨¹

1. 北京大学信息管理系北京 100871;
2. 印第安纳大学信息学、计算机与工程学院布鲁明顿 47408

收稿日期:2017-07-07 修回日期:2017-08-11 出版日期:2017-08-20 发布日期:2017-08-20
通讯作者: 王煜晨(ORCID:0000-0002-1403-4258),本科生,通讯作者,E-mail:wyc199610@pku.edu.cn
作者简介:黄文彬(ORCID:0000-0002-9174-5467),副教授,博士;王冰璐(ORCID:0000-0002-5712-5950),本科生;步一(ORCID:0000-0003-2549-4580),博士生

Author Co-citation Analysis Combined with the Time Slice Information:Method and Experiment

Huang Wenbin¹, Wang Binglu¹, Bu Yi², Wang Yuchen¹

1. Department of Information Management, Peking University, Beijing 100871;
2. School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47408, U. S. A

Received:2017-07-07 Revised:2017-08-11 Online:2017-08-20 Published:2017-08-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的/意义]传统作者共引分析（ACA）方法将领域发展视为一个整体，忽略领域发展期间的变化，导致知识图谱解读会产生一定的偏差。本文旨在引入时间变量，找出领域发展期间的转变关键节点，并以此作为时间切片的划分依据，利用ACA绘制每个时间切片内部的知识图谱，观察领域内的子领域发展与核心作者的变化。[方法/过程]首先通过作者的年度发文比例对时间切片进行选取，借鉴经济学均线理论对曲线做平滑处理，选取曲线变化度较高的年份作为转变节点切割时间段，并对每个时间切片内进行ACA的运算与结果分析。[结果/结论]结果显示，随着时间的变迁，领域知识图谱发生了相应的变化，利用作者发文比例选择时间切点进行综合时间切片的作者共引分析提高了聚类结果的群聚性，且有助于挖掘出科学共同体的更多细节。

关键词: 作者共引分析, 共引分析, 引文分析, 信息计量学

Abstract: [Purpose/significance] Traditional author co-citation analysis regards the domain development as a whole, ignoring that the rapid field changes in the research period would exert deviation impact on the knowledge domain mapping.[Method/process] To solve this problem, this paper proposed the publishing time variable to anatomize the vital turning as the alternation for each time snippet. Furthermore, we could visualize each period so as to compare their differences and conclude the transformation tendency of this domain by visualizing them separately. Specifically, this article selected vital turning points according to publishing ratios for each author annually, during which the time variation curve should be smoothed by the average theory.[Result/conclusion] The result points out that the knowledge domain map has altered relatively with the time transition. Additionally, the clustering effect has been improved in specific period and more details on the scientific community could be detected.

Key words: author co-citation analysis, co-citation analysis, citation analysis, informetrics

中图分类号:

G250

黄文彬, 王冰璐, 步一, 王煜晨. 结合时间切片信息的作者共引分析方法与实证[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(16): 135-142.

Huang Wenbin, Wang Binglu, Bu Yi, Wang Yuchen. Author Co-citation Analysis Combined with the Time Slice Information:Method and Experiment[J]. LIS, 2017, 61(16): 135-142.

参考文献

[1] MCCAIN K W. Mapping authors in intellectual space:a technical overview[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1990, 41(6):433-443.
[2] COTHILL C A, ROGERS E M, MILLS T. Co-citation analysis of the scientific literature of innovation research traditions[J]. Science communication, 1989, 11(2):181-208.
[3] 步一, 刘天祎, 赵丹群, 等. 国外作者共引分析研究评述[J]. 情报杂志, 2015, 34(12):48-53.
[4] WHITE H D, GRIFFITH B C. Author cocitation:a literature measure of intellectual structure[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1981, 32(3):163-171.
[5] HYUN Y S, PARK H. Exploring the research trends of adult education based on author co-citation and social network analysis[J]. The Korean Journal of Human Resource Development Quarterly, 2012, 14(4):45-72.
[6] CHU K C, LIU W I, TSAI M Y. The study of cocitation analysis and knowledge structure on healthcare domain[C]//Proceedings of the 6th Global Conference on Power Control and Optimization. Las Vegas:PCO Company, 2012:247-253.
[7] PILKINGTONA A, MEREDITHB J. The evolution of the intellectual structure of operations management-1980-2006:a citation/co-citation analysis[J]. Journal of operations management, 2009, 27(3):185-202.
[8] GMUR M. Co-citation analysis and the search for invisible colleges:a methodological evaluation[J]. Scientometrics, 2003, 57(1):27-57.
[9] PETERAF M, STEFANO G D, VERONA G. The elephant in the room of dynamic capabilities:bringing two diverging conversations together[J]. Strategic management journal, 2013, 34(12):1389-1410.
[10] ZHAO D, STROMANN A. Comparing all-author and first-author co-citation analyses of information science[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2008, 2(3):229-239.
[11] ZHAO D, STROMANN A. Counting first, last, or all authors in citation analysis:a comprehensive comparison in the highly collaborative stem cell research field[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 62(4):654-676.
[12] 步一, 刘天祎, 黄文彬. 优化传统作者共引分析的研究初探——综合引文发表时间信息的作者共引分析方法[J]. 图书情报知识, 2015, 32(6):89-97.
[13] 黄文彬, 步一, 王冰璐. 作者共引分析方法的扩展与效能改进研究[J]. 图书情报知识, 2017(2):75-82.
[14] WHITE H D, MCCAIN K W. Visualizing a discipline:an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1998, 49(4):327-355.
[15] CHEN C. Searching for intellectual turning points:progressive knowledge domain visualization[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2004, 101(S1):5303-5310.
[16] ROMOS-RODRIGUEZ A, RUIZ-NAVARRO J. Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research:a bibliometric study of the "strategic management journal", 1980-2000[J]. Strategic management journal, 2004, 25(10):981-1004.
[17] PERSSON O. Exploring the analytical potential of comparing citing and cited source items[J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 68(3):561-572.
[18] ÅSTRÖM F. Changes in the LIS research front:time-sliced cocitation analyses of LIS journal articles, 1990-2004[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2007, 58(7):947-957.
[19] GARTLEY H M. Profits in the Stock Market[M]. Washington:Lambert-Gann Publishing Co., 1935.
[20] GENCAY R, STENGOS T. Moving average rules, volume and the predictability of security returns with feed forward networks[J]. Journal of forecasting, 1998, 17(5-6):401-414.
[21] ZHANG C, BU Y, DING Y. Understanding scientific collaboration from the perspective of collaborators and their network structures[EB/OL].[2016-03-15]. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/89424.
[22] SALTON G, LESK M E. Computer evaluation of indexing and text processing[J]. Journal of the ACM, 1968, 15(1):8-36.
[23] SALTON G, WONG A, YANG C S. A vector space model for automatic indexing[J]. Communications of the ACM, 1975, 18(11):613-620.
[24] 祁延莉, 赵丹群. 信息检索概论[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社, 2013:9-11.
[25] JONES K S. A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval[J]. Journal of documentation, 1972,28(1), 11-21.
[26] DEEWESTER S, DUMAIS S T, FURNAS G W, et al. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American society for information science,1990,41(6), 391.
[27] NEWMAN M E. Modularity and community structure in networks[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006, 103(23):8577.
[28] BLONDEL V D, GUILLAUME J L, LAMBIOTTE R, et al. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks[J]. Journal of statistical mechanics theory & experiment, 2008, 5(10):155-168.
[29] MONTGOMERY C, SWANSON D R. Machinelike indexing by people[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,1962, 13(4):359-366.
[30] SWANSON D R. Two medical literatures that are logically but not bibliographically connected[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 1987, 38(4):228-233.
[31] SWANSON D R. Online search for logically-related non-interactive medical literatures:a systematic trial-and-error strategy[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 1989, 40(5):356-358.
[32] SWANSON D R. A second example of mutually isolated medical literatures related by implicit, unnoticed connections[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 1989, 40(6):432-435.
[33] SWANSON D R. Historical note:information retrieval and the future of an illusion[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 1988, 39(2):92-98.
[34] ELLIS D. A behavioral model for information retrieval system design[J]. Journal of information science, 1989, 15(4-5):237-247.
[35] ELLIS D, VASCONCELOS A. Ranganathan and the net:using facet analysis to search and organize the World Wide Web[J]. Aslib proceedings, 1999, 51(51):3-10.
[36] ELLIS D, HAUGAN M. Modelling the information seeking patterns of engineers and research scientists in an industrial environment[J]. Journal of documentation, 1997, 53(4):384-403.
[37] ELLIS D, WILSON T D, FORD N, et al. Information seeking and mediated searching. Part 5. User-intermediary interaction[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2002, 53(11):883-893.
[38] GARFIELD E. Citation indexes-closing the information gap between the pure and applied sciences[EB/OL].[2016-03-15]. http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/ciclosinginfogap1963.pdf.
[39] GARFIELD E. Citation indexing:a natural science literature retrieval system for the social sciences[J]. American behavioral scientist, 1964, 7(10):58-61.
[40] GARFIELD E. Is information retrieval in the arts and humanities inherently different from that in science?[J]. Library quarterly,1980, 50(1):40-57.

结合时间切片信息的作者共引分析方法与实证

Author Co-citation Analysis Combined with the Time Slice Information:Method and Experiment

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	苏辀恒, 张敏, 王锦. 图书情报领域情感研究现状述评[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(6): 137-147.
[2]	张雪, 张志强, 曹玲静, 阮伟南, 任晓亚, 冯志刚. 学科领域研究前沿识别方法研究进展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(12): 139-151.
[3]	张汝昊. 基于语义和位置相似的作者共被引分析方法及效果实证[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(8): 111-124.
[4]	刘小慧, 沈哲思, 廖宇, 杨立英. 科研论文颠覆性指数的改进及其影响因素研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(24): 84-91.
[5]	牌艳欣, 李长玲, 徐璐. 弱引文关系视角下跨学科相关知识组合识别方法探讨——以情报学为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(21): 111-119.
[6]	石燕青, 赵一方. 科学文献被引轨迹的跨学科特征影响研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(14): 74-84.
[7]	李贺, 袁翠敏, 解梦凡. 专利文献中的睡美人现象分析与研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(6): 64-74.
[8]	梁镇涛, 巴志超, 徐健. 基于引文的跨学科领域发展路径分析——以眼动追踪领域为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(23): 65-78.
[9]	齐燕. 基于专利引文分析的领域科技关联发展态势探究——以HCV为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(23): 97-105.
[10]	王新才, 杨千, 王海宁. 国内与国际跨学科研究人员文献需求的对比分析——以南海争端问题为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(5): 6-14.
[11]	艾楠竹, 王新才. 高校2011协同创新中心文献保障的实证分析——以武汉大学为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(5): 15-22.
[12]	杨瑞仙, 姜小函. 从学科和期刊的引证视角看交叉学科的知识结构和演化问题——以图书情报学科为例的实证研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(5): 30-39.
[13]	王冰璐, 步一, 徐扬. 作者三重耦合分析在知识图谱绘制中的应用研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(7): 96-101.
[14]	刘晓娟, 马梁. 基于BKCI的学术著作引文分布研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(24): 105-113.
[15]	孙震, 冷伏海, 张晋辉. 基于知识元的科学计量方法及其实证研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(23): 89-99.