图书情报工作 ›› 2018, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (2): 35-39.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.02.006

• 理论研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

“情报”术语争议对学术交流与学科建设的影响反思

赵柯然, 王延飞   

  1. 北京大学信息管理系 北京 100871
  • 收稿日期:2017-08-07 修回日期:2017-09-05 出版日期:2018-01-20 发布日期:2018-01-20
  • 作者简介:赵柯然(ORCID:0000-0003-2006-2623),博士研究生,E-mail:krzhao@pku.edu.cn;王延飞(ORCID:0000-0002-2627-8153),教授,博士生导师。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系2016年国家社会科学基金项目"创新驱动战略的情报保障研究"(项目编号:16BTQ058)研究成果之一。

A Review over the Influence of “Information” Terminology Issues on Academic Exchanges and Discipline Construction

Zhao Keran, Wang Yanfei   

  1. Department of Information Management, Peking University, Beijing 100871
  • Received:2017-08-07 Revised:2017-09-05 Online:2018-01-20 Published:2018-01-20

摘要: [目的/意义]针对目前情报学界的"情报"术语争议现象,反思情报学学科基本术语的混用与混乱对学术交流与学科建设带来的影响,呼吁规范情报学术语,重构情报研究理论和情报方法体系。[方法/过程]根据术语学的原理和思想,从术语语境、概念层次、多语术语翻译操作3个方面分析情报学现存术语争议产生的原因。[结果/结论]研究认为,对情报术语的探讨是情报学随社会发展的必然,情报学对术语体系规范的需求反映出对理论重建的期待。

关键词: 情报学, 术语学, 语境, 概念, 学术交流, 学科建设

Abstract: [Purpose/significance] The current "information" terminology dispute in the information field has influenced the academic exchanges and the discipline construction. It's time to standardize the terminology of the information science and reconstruct the theory system.[Method/process] Based on the principles and ideas of terminology, this paper analyzed the causes of controversy in the existing terminology of information science from three aspects-the terminology context, the concept level and the multi-lingual term translation operation.[Result/conclusion] This paper suggests that the discussion of information terminology is the necessity of the development of information science with the social development. The demand for the terminology system of information science reflects the expectation for the theoretical reconstruction.

Key words: information science, terminology, context, concept, academic exchanges, discipline construction

中图分类号: