图书情报工作 ›› 2018, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (3): 12-20.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.03.002

• 理论研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

廉政视角下多国财产信息公开制度比较研究

马捷1,2, 张世良1, 葛岩1   

  1. 1. 吉林大学管理学院 长春 130022;
    2. 吉林大学信息资源中心 长春 130022
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-02 修回日期:2017-11-14 出版日期:2018-02-05 发布日期:2018-02-05
  • 通讯作者: 葛岩(ORCID:0000-0002-5785-6876),讲师,博士研究生,通讯作者,E-mail:geyanyan0314137@126.com。
  • 作者简介:马捷(ORCID:0000-0002-1471-2143),教授,博士,博士生导师;张世良(ORCID:0000-0002-2076-2278),博士研究生
  • 基金资助:
    本文系吉林大学廉政研究与教育中心廉政建设专项研究课题"反腐倡廉网络舆情监控研究"(项目编号:25)研究成果之一。

Multinational Comparative Study on the Official Property Information Disclosure System from the Perspective of Building a Clean Administration

Ma Jie1,2, Zhang Shiliang1, Ge Yan1   

  1. 1. School of Management, Jilin University, Changchun 130022;
    2. Center for Studies of Information Resources, Jilin University, Changchun 130022
  • Received:2017-09-02 Revised:2017-11-14 Online:2018-02-05 Published:2018-02-05

摘要: [目的/意义]为了明确国内财产信息公开制度存在的问题,选取四个国家对其财产信息公开制度进行比较分析。[方法/过程]运用文献调研与案例分析方法,深入剖析四个具有代表性国家的财产信息公开制度的发展演进历程、财产信息申报主体、申报内容、申报时间、保障实施水平。[结果/结论]提出完善国内财产信息公开制度的相关建议。

关键词: 廉政建设, 信息公开, 财产申报

Abstract: [Purpose/significance]In order to make clear the problems existing in the domestic property information disclosure system, this paper selects four countries to compare and analyze their property information disclosure systems. [Method/process]By using the literature research method and the case analysis method, the official property information disclosure systems of four typical countries were thoroughly analyzed from the following aspects:the development and evolution process, the declaration subject, the reporting content, the reporting time, the property information and guarantee implementation level. [Result/conclusion]This paper puts forward some relevant suggestions on improving domestic property information disclosure system.

Key words: clean government, information disclosure, property declaration

中图分类号: