图书情报工作 ›› 2018, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (12): 57-64.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.12.008

• 情报研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于核心作者研究兴趣相似性网络的社群隶属研究——以国内情报学领域为例

徐健1, 毛进1, 叶光辉2, 巴志超1, 李纲1   

  1. 1. 武汉大学信息资源研究中心 武汉 430072;
    2. 华中师范大学信息管理学院 武汉 430079
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-26 修回日期:2018-03-09 出版日期:2018-06-20 发布日期:2018-06-20
  • 作者简介:徐健(ORCID:0000-0002-0230-5137),博士,E-mail:xukeywhu@163.com;毛进(ORCID:0000-0001-9572-6709),博士后;叶光辉(ORCID:0000-0002-4162-2282),讲师;巴志超(ORCID:0000-0001-5626-5604),博士研究生;李纲(ORCID:0000-0001-5573-6400),主任,教授,博士生导师。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家自然科学基金项目"科研团队动态演化规律研究"(项目编号:71273196)、"基于排名分析-特征识别的应急决策专家发现"(项目编号:71740012)和"突发公共卫生事件社交媒体信息主题演化与影响力建模"(项目编号:71603189)研究成果之一。

Research on Community Membership Based on the Research Interest Similarity Network of Core Authors: Taking the Domestic Field of Information Science as an Example

Xu Jian1, Mao Jin1, Ye Guanghui2, Ba Zhichao1, Li Gang1   

  1. 1. Center for Studies of Information Resources, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072;
    2. School of Information Management of Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079
  • Received:2017-09-26 Revised:2018-03-09 Online:2018-06-20 Published:2018-06-20

摘要: [目的/意义]构建情报学领域核心作者研究兴趣相似性网络,研究该网络的社群结构与社群隶属问题。[方法/过程]在CSSCI数据库以中图分类号为检索条件,下载该学科1998-2015年所有的论文数据,通过普莱斯定律识别核心作者。将作者研究兴趣用词袋模型表示,并计算作者间研究兴趣的余弦相似性,进而构建核心作者研究兴趣相似性网络。在此基础上进行社群划分并识别各社群研究主题,计算作者对各社群的隶属度与模糊熵。[结果/结论]研究发现,当前我国情报学研究可分为信息组织与检索、文献计量与科学评价、竞争情报与知识管理、情报学学科整体研究4个领域,大部分作者研究并不局限于单个领域,竞争情报和文献计量领域界限明显,较少有作者将彼此作为次要隶属社群。

关键词: 研究兴趣, 网络, 情报学, 社群, 隶属度, 相似性

Abstract: [Purpose/significance] This paper explores the community structure and community membership of the research interest similarity network of core authors in information science.[Method/process] We firstly download all papers of information science retrieved in CSSCI database using the China Library Category number. By recognizing the core-authors in this discipline with Price law, we compute the similarity between each two authors with bag-of-words model and construct the research interest similarity network of core authors. Then we divide it into four research community. Finally, we compute the every author's membership degree to different communities and his/her fuzzy entropy.[Result/conclusion] We discover that the domestic information science discipline has four research field:information organization and retrieval, bibliometrics and scientific evaluation, competitive intelligence and knowledge management, and the information science. Most authors' research isn't limited to one field. Finally, the authors in C2 and C3 merely take each other as secondary membership community, and it implies that the boundary between competitive intelligence and bibliometrics is very obvious.

Key words: research interest, network, information science, community, membership degree, similarity

中图分类号: