科技文献语篇元素自动标注模型研究综述

doi:10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.15.015

图书情报工作 ›› 2018, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (15): 132-144.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.15.015

科技文献语篇元素自动标注模型研究综述

于改红^1,2, 张智雄^1,2,3, 马娜^1,2

1. 中国科学院大学北京 100049;
2. 中国科学院文献情报中心北京 100190;
3. 中国科学院武汉文献情报中心武汉 430071

收稿日期:2017-12-20 修回日期:2018-03-16 出版日期:2018-08-05 发布日期:2018-08-05
通讯作者: 张智雄(ORCID:0000-0003-1596-7487),中国科学院武汉文献情报中心主任,研究员,博士,通讯作者,E-mail:zhangzhx@mail.las.ac.cn
作者简介:于改红(ORCID:0000-0003-1301-2871),馆员,硕士;马娜(ORCID:0000-0001-5016-0879),馆员,硕士。
基金资助:
本文系中国科学院文献情报能力建设专项项目"基于arXiv数据的物理领域科研论文自动语义标注和索引应用示范"（项目编号：院1657）研究成果之一。

Overview of Science and Technology Literature Discourse Elements Automatic Annotation Model Research

Yu Gaihong^1,2, Zhang Zhixiong^1,2,3, Ma Na^1,2

1. University of Chinese academy of sciences, Beijing 100049;
2. National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;
3. Wuhan Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071

Received:2017-12-20 Revised:2018-03-16 Online:2018-08-05 Published:2018-08-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的/意义]为更好地提升科技文献的语义丰富化效果，对国内外科技文献语篇元素标注模型、技术和方法进行调研总结，为文本挖掘、科技论文知识抽取、语义分析系统研究者提供借鉴。[方法/过程]利用学术网站搜索和相关数据库搜索引擎，对涉及科技论文标注、语篇元素、知识抽取、句子识别和自动文章分类等参考文献以及研究报告进行深入阅读和调研，对语篇元素自动标注模型以及相关工作进展进行研究总结。[结果/结论]科技文献语篇元素标注具有非常重要的实际应用价值，构建标注模型需充分考虑构建思想、标注领域和标注粒度以及标注技术手段等方面。

关键词: 科技文献, 语篇元素, 标注模型, 自动标注

Abstract: [Purpose/significance] In order to improve the semantic enrichment effect of scientific and technical literature, this paper summarizes the domestic and foreign scientific and technical literature discourse elements automatic annotation model, technologies and methods, and provides reference for text mining, knowledge extraction and semantic analysis system. [Method/process] This paper used Web Scholar and related database search engine to conduct in-depth reading and related research on references and research reports involving scientific and technical papers annotation, discourse elements, knowledge extraction, sentence recognition, automatic article classification, etc. and summarized the research the main technologies of each module in the framework. [Result/conclusion] The annotation of scientific literature discourse elements has very important practical application value. The construction of annotation model needs to take full account of construction thought, annotation field and annotation granularity as well as annotation techniques.

Key words: scientific and technical literature, discourse elements, annotation model, automatic annotation

中图分类号:

G251

于改红, 张智雄, 马娜. 科技文献语篇元素自动标注模型研究综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(15): 132-144.

Yu Gaihong, Zhang Zhixiong, Ma Na. Overview of Science and Technology Literature Discourse Elements Automatic Annotation Model Research[J]. LIS, 2018, 62(15): 132-144.

参考文献

[1] FALQUET G. New trends for reading scientific documents[C]//ACM workshop on online books, complementary social media and crowdsourcing. New York:ACM, 2011:19-24.
[2] RIBAUPIERRE H, FALQUET G. A user-centric model to semantically annotate and retrieve scientific documents[C]//Proceedings of the sixth international workshop on exploiting semantic annotations in information retrieval. New York:ACM,2013:21-24.
[3] RIBAUPIERRE H, FALQUET G. User-centric design and evaluation of a semantic annotation model for scientific documents[C]//Proceedings of the 14th international conference on knowledge technologies and data-driven business. New York:ACM,2014:40.
[4] RIBAUPIERRE H. Precise information retrieval in semantic scientific digital libraries[D]//Genève:UNIVERSITÉ DE GENÈVE,2014.
[5] RIBAUPIERRE H, FALQUET G. An automated annotation process for the SciDocAnnot scientific document model[C]//Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on semantic digital archives. Osaka:International Workshop on Semantic Digital Archives,2015:30-41.
[6] RIBAUPIERRE H, FALQUET G. Extracting discourse elements and annotating scientific documents using the SciAnnotDoc model:a use case in gender documents[J]. International journal on digital libraries, 2017,1(3):1-16.
[7] SOLDATOVA L N, KING R D. An ontology of scientific experiments[J]. Journal of the royal society interface, 2006, 3(11):795-803.
[8] SOLDATOVA L, LIAKATA M. An ontology methodology and cisp-the proposed core information about scientific papers[EB/OL].[2018-05-31]. http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/137/1/ReportCISP.pdf.
[9] LIAKATA M, SOLDATOVA L. Guidelines for the annotation of general scientific concepts[J]. Applied & environmental microbiology, 2008, 61(3):1020-1026.
[10] LIAKATA M, CLAIRE Q, SOLDATOVA L N. Semantic annotation of papers:interface & enrichment tool[C]//Proceedings of the BioNLP 2009 workshop. boulder. Colorado:Association for Computational Linguistics,2009:193-200.
[11] LIAKATA M, TEUFEL S, SIDDHARTHAN A, et al. Corpora for the conceptualisation and zoning of scientific papers[C]//International conference on language resources and evaluation. Valletta:European Languages Resources Association (ELRA), 2010:105-108.
[12] LIAKATA M, SAHA S, DOBNIK S, et al. Automatic recognition of conceptualization zones in scientific articles and two life science applications[J]. BMC bioinformatics, 2012, 28(7):991-1000.
[13] LIAKATA M, THOMPSON P, de WAARD A, et al. A three-way perspective on scientific discourse annotation for knowledge extraction[C]//Proceedings of the workshop on detecting structure in scholarly discourse. Jeju Island:Association for Computational Linguistics, 2012:37-46.
[14] KORHONEN A, SILINS I, LIN S, et al. The first step in the development of text mining technology for cancer risk assessment:identifying and organizing scientific evidence in risk assessment literature[J]. BMC bioinformatics,2009, 10(1):1-19.
[15] GUO Y, KORHONEN A, LIAKATA M, et al. Identifying the information structure of scientific abstracts:an investigation of three different schemes[C]//Proceedings of the 2010 workshop on biomedical natural language processing. Uppsala:Association for Computational Linguistics, 2010:99-107.
[16] GUO Y, KORHONEN A, LIAKATA M, et al. A comparison and user-based evaluation of models of textual information structure in the context of cancer risk assessment[J]. BMC bioinformatics, 2011, 12(1):1-18.
[17] LIAKATA M, DOBNIK S, SAHA S, et al. A discourse-driven content model for summarising scientific articles evaluated in a complex question answering task[C]//Proceedings of the 2013 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. EMNLP. Seattle:Association for Computational Linguistics, 2013:747-757.
[18] RAVENSCROFT J, OELLRICH A, SAHA S, et al. Multi-label annotation in scientific articles-the multi-label cancer risk assessment corpus[C]//Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2016).Portoro?:European Language Resources Association (ELRA),2016.
[19] DUMA D, LIAKATA M, CLARE A, et al. Applying core scientific concepts to context-based citation recommendation[C]//Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2016).Portoro?:European Language Resources Association (ELRA),2016.
[20] TEUFEL S, CARLETTA J, MOENS M. An annotation scheme for discourse-level argumentation in research articles[C]//Proceedings of the ninth conference on European chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Stroudsburg:Association for Computational Linguistics,1999:110-117.
[21] TEUFEL S. Argumentative zoning:information extraction from scientific text[D]. Edinburgh:University of Edinburgh,1999.
[22] TEUFEL S, MOENS M. Summarizing scientific articles:experiments with relevance and rhetorical status[J]. Computational linguistics, 2002, 28(4):409-445.
[23] TEUFEL S, BATCHELOR C, BATCHELOR C. Towards discipline-independent argumentative zoning:evidence from chemistry and computational linguistics[C]//Conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. Singapore:Association for Computational Linguistics,2009:1493-1502.
[24] HEFFERNAN K, TEUFEL S. Identifying problems and solutions in scientific text[J]. Scientometrics,2018(1):1-16.
[25] YAMADA H, TEUFEL S, TOKUNAGA T. Annotation of argument structure in Japanese legal documents[C]//Proceedings of the 4th workshop on argument mining. Copenhagen:Association for Computational Linguistics,2017:22-31.
[26] RONZANO F, SAGGION H. Dr. inventor framework:extracting structured information from scientific publications[C]//JAPKOWICZ N, MATWIN S. Discovery science. Cham,:Springer, 2015:209-220.
[27] FISAS B, RONZANO F, SAGGION H. On the discoursive structure of computer graphics research papers[C]//The 9th linguistic annotation workshop held in conjuncion with NAACL. Denver:Association for Computational Linguistics,2015:42-51.
[28] FISAS B, RONZANO F, SAGGION H. A multi-layered annotated corpus of scientific papers[C]//Proceedings of the tenth international conference on language resources and evaluation. Paris:European Language Resources Association, 2016.
[29] RONZANO F, SAGGION H. Knowledge extraction and modeling from scientific publications[M]//Osborne:Springer International Publishing,2016:11-25.
[30] RONZANO F, FREIRE A, SAEZ-TRUMPER D, et al. Making sense of massive amounts of scientific publications:the scientific knowledge miner project[C]//BIRNDL 2016 joint workshop on bibliometric-enhanced information retrieval and NLP for digital libraries. New York:Digital Libraries. IEEE, 2016:36-41.
[31] ANKE L E, SAGGION H, RONZANO F. Weakly supervised definition extraction[C]//Proceedings of the international conference recent advances in natural language processing. Shoumen:INCOMA Ltd, 2015:176-185.
[32] 邢美凤. 科技文献中句子级新信息探测方法研究[D].北京:中国科学院研究生院, 2012.
[33] 白光祖, 何远标, 马建霞,等. 利用小样本量机器学习实现学术文摘结构的自动识别[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2014, 30(7):34-40.
[34] 钱力, 张晓林, 王茜. 基于科技文献的研究设计指纹描述框架研究[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2015(1):14-20.
[35] SONG W, FU R, LIU L, et al. Discourse element identification in student essays based on global and local cohesion[C]//Proceedings of the 2015 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. Lisbon:Association for Computational Linguistics,2015:2255-2261.
[36] GUO Y, KORHONEN A, POIBEAU T. A weakly-supervised approach to argumentative zoning of scientific documents[C]//Proceedings of the conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. Edinburgh:Association for Computational Linguistics, 2011:273-283.
[37] CONTRACTOR D, GUO Y, KORHONEN A. Using argumentative zones for extractive summarization of scientific articles[C]//Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Linguistics. Mumbai:The COLING 2012 Organizing Committee, 2012:663-678.
[38] SILINS I, KORHONEN A, GUO Y, et al. A text-mining approach for chemical risk assessment and cancer research[J]. Toxicology letters, 2014,229(4):S164-S165.
[39] GUO Y, SÉAGHDHA D O, SILINS I, et al. CRAB 2.0:a text mining tool for supporting literature review in chemical cancer risk assessment[C]//Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics:System Demonstrations. Dublin:Dublin City University and Association for Computational Linguistics,2014:76-80.
[40] KIELA D, GUO Y, STENIUS U, et al. Unsupervised discovery of information structure in biomedical documents[J]. BMC bioinformatics, 2014, 31(7):1084-1092.
[41] BAKER S, SILINS I, GUO Y, et al. Automatic semantic classification of scientific literature according to the hallmarks of cancer[J]. BMC bioinformatics, 2015, 32(3):432-440.
[42] BAKER S, KORHONEN A. Initializing neural networks for hierarchical multi-label text classification[C]//16th Workshop on Biomedical Natural Language Processing. Vancouver:Association for Comutational Linguistics, 2017:307-315.
[43] KIM S N, MARTINEZ D, CAVEDON L, et al. Automatic classification of sentences to support evidence based medicine[J]BMC bioinformatics, 2011, 12(2):S5.
[44] SOLLACI L B, Pereira M G. The introduction, methods, results, and discussion (IMRAD) structure:a fifty-year survey[J]. Journal of the medical library association,2004, 92(3):364-371.
[45] GOBEILL J, TBAHRITI I, EHRLER F, et al. Gene ontology density estimation and discourse analysis for automatic GeneRiF extraction[J]BMC bioinformatics, 2008, 9(3):S9-19.
[46] JIMENO-YEPES A J, STICCO J C, MORK J G, et al. GeneRIF indexing:sentence selection based on machine learning[J]. BMC bioinformatics, 2013, 14(1):1-10.
[47] CLARK T, CICCARESE P N, GOBLE C A. Micropublications:a semantic model for claims, evidence, arguments and annotations in biomedical communications[J]. Journal of biomedical semantics, 2014, 5(1):28-61.
[48] ABU-JBARA A, RADEV D. Reference scope identification in citing sentences[C]//Proceedings of the 2012 conference of the North American chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics:human language technologies. Montreal:Association for Computational Linguistics, 2012:80-90.

科技文献语篇元素自动标注模型研究综述

Overview of Science and Technology Literature Discourse Elements Automatic Annotation Model Research

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	庞弘燊, 钟秀梅. 颠覆性技术产生过程的多源数据多特征项可视化研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(19): 122-131.
[2]	董美, 常志军. 一种面向中医领域科技文献的实体关系抽取方法[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(18): 105-113.
[3]	张吉玉, 张均胜. 考虑时序的单篇科技文献新颖性评估方法[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(17): 93-105.
[4]	孙坦, 黄永文, 张建勇, 赵瑞雪, 鲜国建, 李娇. 开放科学环境下国家科技文献发展战略研究与展望[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(14): 3-12.
[5]	陈金菊, 欧石燕. 数字图像语义标注模型比较与分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(6): 116-124.
[6]	秦春秀, 杨智娟, 赵捧未, 刘杰. 面向科技文献知识表示的知识元本体模型[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(3): 94-103.
[7]	孙安, 于英香, 罗永刚, 王祺. 序列标注模型中的字粒度特征提取方案研究——以CCKS2017:Task2临床病历命名实体识别任务为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(11): 103-111.
[8]	石崇德, 乔晓东, 王惠临, 屈鹏. 中文科技文献切分的领域适应技术研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(19): 13-18.
[9]	丁洁, 王曰芬. 基于特征项的文献共现网络在学术信息检索中的应用[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(15): 135-141.
[10]	王晓笛, 祝娜, 白如江, 王效岳. 基于语义角色标注的文献相似度检测研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(12): 130-135.
[11]	孙振领. 我国省级科技文献共享服务平台建设比较研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013, 57(14): 67-71,145.
[12]	冷伏海, 白如江, 祝清松. 面向科技文献的混合语义信息抽取方法研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013, 57(11): 112-119.
[13]	徐勇, 华文立, 沈小玲, 司凤山, 周善英. 科技文献查询推荐系统设计[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013, 57(04): 131-137.
[14]	徐勇, 司凤山, 吴延辉, 陈建国, 周善英. 基于概念泛化的科技文献推荐算法[J]. 图书情报工作, 2012, 56(21): 101-108.
[15]	刘芳兵彭晓东沈敏. 科技文献资源共享平台架构与运行机制实践研究——以重庆市科技文献资源共享平台为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2012, 56(09): 66-69.