科研众包项目的协作模式研究——以Crowd Research为例

doi:10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.22.018

图书情报工作 ›› 2018, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (22): 146-152.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.22.018

• 海外观察 • 上一篇

科研众包项目的协作模式研究——以Crowd Research为例

寇蕾蕾^1,2, 祝忠明³, 白林林^2,3

1 中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院兰州 730000;
2 中国科学院大学经济与管理学院北京 100049;
3 中国科学院兰州文献情报中心兰州 730000

收稿日期:2018-04-19 修回日期:2018-06-21 出版日期:2018-11-20 发布日期:2018-11-20
作者简介:寇蕾蕾(ORCID:0000-0002-0953-7125),博士研究生,E-mail:koull@llas.ac.cn;祝忠明(ORCID:0000-0002-2365-3050),研究员,博士生导师;白林林(ORCID:0000-0003-2265-7399),博士研究生。
基金资助:
本文系中国科学院文献情报能力建设专项"中国开放科研知识云"（项目编号：Y7ZG031001）研究成果之一。

Exploring the Collaborative Mode of Crowdsourcing Research Project: A Case Study of Crowd Research

Kou Leilei^1,2, Zhu Zhongming³, Bai Linlin^2,3

1 Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000;
2 School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049;
3 Lanzhou Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000

Received:2018-04-19 Revised:2018-06-21 Online:2018-11-20 Published:2018-11-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的/意义] 分析科研众包项目的协作模式，为我国在开放环境下开展协作研究提供理论指导和行动指南。[方法/过程] 通过分析Crowd Research项目的协作过程，从公众科研人员招募、研究过程协作、结果提交、成果产出4方面入手，详细说明各部分的关键步骤，总结Crowd Research对我国发展科研众包项目的启示。[结果/结论] 研究发现，Crowd Research基于众包思想，发展了一种新型的科研协作模式，公众科研人员在专业科研人员的带领下可以协作参与研究过程，包括自主选择里程碑、同行评估提交内容、互相分配贡献值、合作发表学术论文等。

关键词: 科研众包, 群体参与, Crowd Research协作模式

Abstract: [Purpose/significance] This paper presents the collaboration model of crowdsourcing research projects, to provide theoretical guidance and action guidelines for the development of collaborative research in China under open environment.[Method/process] This paper analyzed the collaborative process of the Crowd Research project from four-aspects,including the recruitment of public participants, synchronous collaboration, the submission of research results, and the production of academic results. The key steps of each part were described and some implications for the development of crowdsourcing research projects in China were summarized.[Result/conclusion] This paper finds that Crowd Research has developed a new type of collaboration model of crowdsourcing research based on the crowdsourcing technology, in which public scientists can collaborate in the research process under the leadership of professional researchers, including independent selection of milestones, peer review submissions, mutual assignment of contribution values, co-publishing academic papers, etc.

Key words: crowdsourcing research, mass participation, crowd research, collaboration model

中图分类号:

G254

寇蕾蕾, 祝忠明, 白林林. 科研众包项目的协作模式研究——以Crowd Research为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(22): 146-152.

Kou Leilei, Zhu Zhongming, Bai Linlin. Exploring the Collaborative Mode of Crowdsourcing Research Project: A Case Study of Crowd Research[J]. LIS, 2018, 62(22): 146-152.

参考文献

[1] 余全民, 陈文杰, 邓媚. 关于政府引导下科研众包平台建设的思考[J]. 广东科技, 2016, 25(10):5-8.
[2] 刘启强, 赵恒煜. 科研众包:众智成城的"双创"模式[J]. 广东科技, 2018(1):12-13.
[3] 赵宇翔. 科研众包视角下公众科学项目刍议:概念解析、模式探索及学科机遇[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2017, 43(5):42-56.
[4] GADIRAJU U, KAWASE R, DIETZE S. A taxonomy of microtasks on the web[C]//ACM Conference on hypertext and social media. New York:ACM, 2014:218-223.
[5] EVOLUTION MEGALAB. Welcome to the evolution megaLab[EB/OL].[2018-04-10]. http://evolutionmegalab.org/.
[6] Crowd research initiative[EB/OL].[2018-04-12]. http://crowdresearchinitiative.stanford.edu/.
[7] UC Santa Cruz + Stanford.Calling aspiring researchers[EB/OL].[2018-04-15]. https://aspiringresearchers.soe.ucsc.edu/faqs.html.
[8] Stanford crowd research. DAEMO[EB/OL].[2018-04-15]. https://www.daemo.org/home.
[9] VEIT A, WILBER M, VAISH R, et al. On optimizing human-machine task assignments[EB/OL].[2018-04-16].https://arxiv.org/pdf/1509.07543.pdf.
[10] VAISH R, GAIKWAD S S, KOVACS G, et al. Crowd research:open and scalable university laboratories[C]//The ACM symposium.New York:ACM, 2017:829-843.
[11] VAISH R, DAVIS J. Crowd sourcing the research process[EB/OL].[2018-04-16].https://systems.soe.ucsc.edu/sites/default/files/CrowdResearch_RajanVaish.pdf.
[12] Stanford HCI Group Crowd Research. main page[EB/OL].[2018-04-18]. http://crowdresearch.stanford.edu/w/index.php?title=Main_Page.
[13] Stanford HCI Group.CREDDIT[EB/OL].[2018-04-20]. https://creddit.stanford.edu/.
[14] GAIKWAD S S, MORINA D, GINZBERG A, et al. Boomerang:rebounding the consequences of reputation feedback on crowdsourcing platforms[C]//Symposium on user interface software and technology.New York:ACM, 2016:625-637.
[15] 闫娜,王伟. 论大学图书馆参与文化建设——以天津财经大学图书馆为例[J]. 图书馆工作与研究,2016(1):13-16.
[16] SHOTTON D,PERONI S. SCoRO, the scholarly contributions and roles ontology[EB/OL].[2018-04-22]. https://sparontologies.github.io/scoro/current/scoro.html.

科研众包项目的协作模式研究——以Crowd Research为例

Exploring the Collaborative Mode of Crowdsourcing Research Project: A Case Study of Crowd Research

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	赵栋祥. 公众科学平台:发展现状、服务实践与启示——以Zooniverse为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(17): 120-128.
[2]	牛毅冲, 赵宇翔, 朱庆华. 基于科研众包模式的公众科学项目运作机制初探——以Evolution MegaLab为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(1): 5-13.
[3]	尚新丽. 支持群体参与的语义网本体构建方式MMOC解析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2011, 55(18): 121-124.