多维度视角下百度百科词条评价指标构建

doi:10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2019.12.015

图书情报工作 ›› 2019, Vol. 63 ›› Issue (12): 114-120.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2019.12.015

多维度视角下百度百科词条评价指标构建

何振宇, 董祥祥, 朱庆华

南京大学信息管理学院南京 210023

收稿日期:2018-10-31 修回日期:2018-12-04 出版日期:2019-06-20 发布日期:2019-06-20
通讯作者: 何振宇(ORCID:0000-0002-6002-7884),博士研究生,通讯作者,E-mail:demandsupply@163.com。
作者简介:董祥祥(ORCID:0000-0003-0273-3817),硕士研究生;朱庆华(ORCID:0000-0002-4879-399X),副院长,教授,博士,博士生导师。
基金资助:
本文系国家自然科学基金面上项目"协同视角下社会化搜索的形成机制与实现模式研究"（项目编号：71473114）研究成果之一。

Construction of Baidu Encyclopedia Entry Evaluation Index Under Multi-dimensional Perspective

He Zhenyu, Dong Xiangxiang, Zhu Qinghua

School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023

Received:2018-10-31 Revised:2018-12-04 Online:2019-06-20 Published:2019-06-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的/意义]将用户使用行为纳入百科词条评价体系中，从多维度视角对百度百科词条进行综合评价。[方法/过程]结合国内外学者的研究成果，基于4个维度，选取了12项量化指标作为研究指标，对百度百科词条作了综合评价。[结果/结论]用户使用行为指标与链接指标在词条综合评价中起到相对重要的作用；研究丰富了百科词条研究的评价体系，但局限是未考虑丰富度、严谨性等难以准确量化的特征。

关键词: 百度百科词条, 灰色关联分析, 熵权法, 综合评价

Abstract: [Purpose/significance] The study incorporates user behavior into the encyclopedia entry evaluation system, and comprehensively evaluates Baidu Encyclopedia entries from a multi-dimensional perspective.[Method/process] From four dimensions, the study selected 12 quantitative indicators as research indicators, and comprehensively evaluated Baidu Encyclopedia entries.[Result/conclusion] User use behavior indicators and link indicators play a relatively important role in comprehensive evaluation of entries; This study enriches the evaluation system of encyclopedia entry research, but the limitation is that it is difficult to accurately quantify without considering richness and rigor. Characteristics.

Key words: Baidu Encyclopedia entry, GRA, entropy weight method, comprehensive evaluation

中图分类号:

G250

何振宇, 董祥祥, 朱庆华. 多维度视角下百度百科词条评价指标构建[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(12): 114-120.

He Zhenyu, Dong Xiangxiang, Zhu Qinghua. Construction of Baidu Encyclopedia Entry Evaluation Index Under Multi-dimensional Perspective[J]. LIS, 2019, 63(12): 114-120.

参考文献

[1] WIKIPEDIA. Article assessment[EB/OL].[2018-10-29].https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Article_assessment_(historical).
[2] STVILIA B, FARAJ A, YI Y J. Issues of cross-contextual information quality evaluation-the case of arabic, english, and korean Wikipediaes[J]. Library & information science research, 2009, 31(4):232-239.
[3] LICHTENSTEIN S, PARKER C M. Wikipedia model for collective intelligence:a review of information quality[J]. International journal of knowledge and learning, 2009, 5(3/4):254-272.
[4] ARAZY O, NOV O, PATTERSON R, et al. Information quality in Wikipedia:the effects of group composition and task conflict[J]. Journal of management information systems, 2011, 27(4):71-98.
[5] LIU J, RAM S. Who does what:collaboration patterns in the Wikipedia and their impact on article quality[J]. ACM transactions on management information systems, 2011, 2(2):1-23.
[6] YAARI E, BARUCHSON-ARBIB S, BAR-ILAN J. Information quality assessment of community generated content:a user study of Wikipedia.[J]. Journal of information science, 2011, 37(5):487-498.
[7] OSMAN K. The role of conflict in determining consensus on quality in Wikipedia articles[C]//International symposium on open collaboration. New York:ACM, 2013:1-6.
[8] LEWANDOWSKI D, SPREE U. Ranking of Wikipedia articles in search engines revisited:fair ranking for reasonable quality?[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 2014, 62(1):117-132.
[9] 丁敬达.维基百科词条信息质量启发式评价框架研究[J].图书情报知识, 2014(2):11-17.
[10] 赵文轩.网络百科资源质量探析[J].图书馆理论与实践, 2016(4):38-42.
[11] 黄令贺.网络百科信息质量动态演进探索研究[J].情报理论与实践, 2018(2):127-131
[12] LIH A. Wikipedia as Participatory journalism:reliable sources? metrics for evaluating collaborative media as a news resource[C]//Proceedings of the 5th international symposium on online journalism. Austin:ISOJ,2004:16-17.
[13] CHEVALIER F, HUOT S, FEKETE J D. Wikipedia viz:conveying article quality for casual Wikipedia readers[C]//Pacific visualization symposium. Taipei:IEEE, 2010:215-222.
[14] 金燕,周婷,詹丽华.基于层次分析法的协同内容创建系统质量评价体系研究——以百度百科为例[J].图书馆理论与实践, 2015(7):41-45.
[15] 张博,乔欢.协同知识生产社区的内容质量评估模型研究——以维基百科为例[J].现代情报,2015,35(10):17-22.
[16] 金燕.基于用户体验的协同内容创建系统质量保证措施——以百度百科为例[J].情报理论与实践,2016,39(3):6-9.
[17] WARNCKEWANG M, COSLEY D, RIEDL J. Tell me more:an actionable quality model for Wikipedia[C]//International symposium on open collaboration. New York:ACM, 2013:1-10.
[18] STVILIA B, TWIDALE M B, SMITH L C, et al. Assessing information quality of a community-based encyclopedia[C]//International conference on information quality. Cambridge:ICIQ, 2005:442-454.
[19] BLUMENSTOCK J E. Size matters:word count as a measure of quality on Wikipedia[C]//International conference on World Wide Web. New York:ACM, 2008:1095-1096.
[20] DALIP D H, CRISTO M. Automatic quality assessment of content created collaboratively by web communities:a case study of Wikipedia[C]//ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries. New York:ACM, 2009:295-304.
[21] CALZADA G D L, DEKHTYAR A. On measuring the quality of Wikipedia articles[C]//Workshop on Information credibility. New York:ACM, 2010:11-18.
[22] 裘江南,翁楠,徐胜国.基于C4.5的维基百科页面信息质量评价模型研究[J].情报学报, 2012, 31(12):1259-1264.
[23] 李欣奕.网络百科条目质量评价研究[D].长沙:国防科学技术大学, 2014.
[24] 仝召娟,许鑫.百度百科网页质量的自动化评价[J].信息资源管理学报, 2015(2):63-69.
[25] 肖奎,李兵,吴天吉.基于用户行为分析的维基百科词条质量评价方法[J].情报杂志, 2015(5):185-189.
[26] HU M, LIM E, SUN A, et al. Measuring article quality in Wikipedia:models and evaluation[C]//Conference on information and knowledge management. New York:ACM, 2007:243-252.
[27] ZENG H, ALHOSSAINI M A, DING L, et al. Computing trust from revision history[C]//International conference on privacy, security and trust:bridge the gap between PST technologies and business services. New York:ACM, 2006:1-1.
[28] LIM E, VUONG B, LAUW H W, et al. Measuring qualities of articles contributed by online communities[C]//IEEE/WIC/ACM International conference on Web intelligence. Washington DC:IEEE, 2006:81-87.
[29] DONDIO P, BARRETT S. Computational trust in web content quality:a comparative evaluation on the Wikipedia project[J]. Informatica, 2007, 31(2):151-160.
[30] WOHNER T, PETERS R. Assessing the quality of Wikipedia articles with lifecycle based metrics[C]//International symposium on Wikis. Orlando:DBLP, 2009:1-10.
[31] JAVANMARDI S, LOPES C. Statistical measure of quality in Wikipedia[C]//Proceedings of the first workshop on social media analytics. New York:ACM, 2010:132-138.
[32] YU S, YOSHIKAWA M. Assessing quality score of Wikipedia article using mutual evaluation of editors and texts[C]//ACM International conference on information & knowledge management. New York:ACM, 2013:1727-1732.
[33] LI X, TANG J, WANG T, et al. Automatically assessing Wikipedia article quality by exploiting article-editor networks[C]//Advances in Information Retrieval, ECIR. Gewerbestrasse:Springer, Cham, 2015:574-580.
[34] WILKINSON D.M, HUBERMAN B.A. Cooperation and quality in Wikipedia[C]//International symposium on Wikis. New York:ACM, 2007:157-164.
[35] 肖奎,罗保山,吴天吉.一种限定领域的网络文档资源质量评价方法——以维基百科为例[J].情报理论与实践, 2016, 39(12):120-123.
[36] WU K, ZHU Q, ZHAO Y, et al. Mining the factors affecting the quality of Wikipedia articles[C]//International conference of information science and management engineering. Washington DC:IEEE, 2010:343-346.
[37] 刘思峰,蔡华,杨英杰,等.灰色关联分析模型研究进展[J].系统工程理论与实践, 2013, 33(8):2041-2046.
[38] 倪九派, 李萍, 魏朝富,等.基于AHP和熵权法赋权的区域土地开发整理潜力评价[J].农业工程学报, 2009, 25(5):202-209.

多维度视角下百度百科词条评价指标构建

Construction of Baidu Encyclopedia Entry Evaluation Index Under Multi-dimensional Perspective

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	赵玮佳, 郝群, 张立彬. 高校图书馆外文数据库资源建设的使用统计和分析思考——以复旦大学4个数据库的实践为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(4): 73-86.
[2]	张兆阳, 朱伟杰, 李直, 王筱宇, 赵蓉英. 学术期刊微信公众平台话语权评价研究——以图情领域为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(11): 32-41.
[3]	朱世琴, 邱悦, 陈红英. 融入评论指标的中文图书综合评价体系适应性研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(9): 23-31.
[4]	郑赛硕, 王学昭, 陈小莉. 共性技术识别方法构建与实证研究——以集成电路行业为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(15): 130-139.
[5]	田波, 郑羽莎, 刘鹏远, 李春好. 移动APP用户隐私信息泄露风险评价指标及实证研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(19): 101-110.
[6]	奉国和, 周榕鑫, 武佳佳. 基于熵权TOPSIS及因子分析的学术期刊综合评价研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(17): 84-95.
[7]	王晰巍, 王楠阿雪, 张柳, 李师萌. 新型智库微信平台生态性评价指标及实证——基于信息生态视角[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(15): 51-59.
[8]	郭顺利, 张向先, 李中梅. 面向用户信息需求的移动O2O在线评论有用性排序模型研究——以美团为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015, 59(23): 85-93.
[9]	钱佳平, 袁辉, 范全青. 区域数字图书馆绩效评估框架研究——以ZADL为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(17): 61-66.
[10]	周艳, 蒲筱哥. 熵权TOPSIS模型在数据库绩效评价中的应用研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(08): 36-41.
[11]	张志千, 赵继伦. 企业竞争情报成果模糊综合评价研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(04): 53-58.
[12]	沈小玲, 徐勇, 严卫中. 基于网络文献计量的科技论文学术影响力综合评价研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013, 57(21): 95-103.
[13]	蒲筱哥, 胡亚敏. 图书馆电子资源绩效多指标综合评价方法评析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013, (07): 139-143,146.
[14]	郭红梅, 何苗, 邢星, 金晶, 何钦成. 不同自然科学门类间论文学术影响力多指标综合评价的合理性研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2012, 56(22): 62-68.
[15]	梁孟华. 图书馆知识信息服务综合评价指标体系的构建及其校验研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2012, 56(01): 73-77.