图书情报工作 ›› 2019, Vol. 63 ›› Issue (23): 146-152.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2019.23.017

• 综述述评 • 上一篇    

国内高校信息素养教学效果评价研究系统综述

彭立伟1, 李磊2, 潘宏3   

  1. 1. 天津师范大学图书馆 天津 300387;
    2. 天津师范大学文学院 天津 300387;
    3. 天津农学院图书馆 天津 300380
  • 收稿日期:2018-11-25 修回日期:2019-03-27 出版日期:2019-12-05 发布日期:2019-12-05
  • 作者简介:彭立伟(ORCID:0000-0001-7294-9782),副研究馆员,硕士,E-mail:pengliwei@mail.tjnu.edu.cn;李磊(ORCID:0000-0002-9677-5470),助理实验师,硕士;潘宏(ORCID:0000-0003-0980-8607),副研究馆员,硕士。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家社会科学青年基金项目"社会化媒体情境下高校信息素养内容框架与教育实践实证研究"(项目编号:15CTQ013)研究成果之一。

A Systematic Review on the Assessment of Information Literacy Teaching Effectin Higher Education

Peng Liwei1, Li Lei2, Pan Hong3   

  1. 1. Tianjin Normal University Library, Tianjin 300387;
    2. College of Literature, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
    3. College Library Tianjin Agricultural, Tianjin 300380
  • Received:2018-11-25 Revised:2019-03-27 Online:2019-12-05 Published:2019-12-05

摘要: [目的/意义] 分析国内高校信息素养教学效果评价取得的成效、经验与不足,为后续实证调研提供参考。[方法/过程] 基于CNKI《中国学术期刊(网络版)》数据库,聚焦于信息素养教育与学生学习效果,利用系统综述方法对国内信息素养教学效果评价方法、评价类型、评价主体等进行研究。[结果/结论] 国内信息素养教学效果评价利用调查法、量表法、表现评价、小组评价等多种方法,取得了一定成就,但在评价方法的科学化、评价类型的多样化、评价主体的专业化方面还有待提高。

关键词: 信息素养, 评价, 系统综述

Abstract: [Purpose/significance] By analyzing the effectiveness, experience and deficiencies of information literacy teaching assessment in domestic universities, the paper aimed to provide reference for subsequent empirical research.[Method/process] Based on the articles in China Academic Journal Network Publishing Database, and focusing on the effect of information literacy teaching and student learning, this paper discussed the assessment methods, types, and subjects using systematic review method.[Result/conclusion] The effectiveness of information literacy assessment used various methods(such as survey, scale, performance assessment, and group evaluation), and it had achieved certain achievements. However, the scientification of assessment methods, the diversification of assessment types, and the professionalization of assessment subjects still need to be improved.

Key words: information literacy, assessment, systematic review

中图分类号: