图书情报工作 ›› 2020, Vol. 64 ›› Issue (3): 100-110.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.03.011

• 情报研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

“长江学者奖励计划”资助前后科研合作变化与分析——以2005年度长江学者为例

刘晓娟, 余梦霞, 赵卓婧, 韦娱   

  1. 北京师范大学政府管理学院 北京 100875
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-15 修回日期:2019-08-14 出版日期:2020-02-05 发布日期:2020-02-05
  • 作者简介:刘晓娟(ORCID:0000-0002-5727-733X),教授,博士,硕士生导师,E-mail:lxj_2007@bnu.edu.cn;余梦霞(ORCID:0000-0002-9738-0868),硕士研究生;赵卓婧(ORCID:0000-0003-3009-037X),硕士研究生;韦娱(ORCID:0000-0003-2377-7683),硕士研究生。

Study on the Change of Scientific Research Cooperation Before and After Receiving the Cheung Kong Scholars Award: A Case Study of Recipients in 2005

Liu Xiaojuan, Yu Mengxia, Zhao Zhuojing, Wei Yu   

  1. School of Government, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
  • Received:2019-05-15 Revised:2019-08-14 Online:2020-02-05 Published:2020-02-05

摘要: [目的/意义] 科研合作已经成为一种非常普遍的现象,并且很多科研项目也将团队合作纳入实施效果的考核范围,因此,本研究从科研合作的角度,分析长江学者在受资助后的科研合作情况是否产生变化,探讨长江学者在团队建设、国际国内合作等方面发挥的作用,有助于项目实施效果的评估,有利于人才项目的可持续性发展。[方法/过程] 以2005年度长江学者特聘教授为例,获取83位长江学者的个人信息,及其发表在1996-2015年间的所有SCI/SSCI论文数据。设置两个时间窗口:对于2005年度长江学者获得者而言,其获评长江学者之前的10年(1996-2005年,简称为获评前10年),及获评长江学者之后的10年(2006-2015年,简称为获评后10年);采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验方法,分析其在获评长江学者前后的科研合作变化情况,包括合作圈子大小的变化、合作强度的变化、合作持续性的变化、在合作中承担角色的变化以及国际/国内合作的变化。[结果/结论] 研究发现,长江学者在获评后10年间发挥了学术带头作用,在团队建设、国际国内合作等方面发挥了显著作用。获评后10年,科研合作圈子(42 VS.148)、合作强度(2.17 VS.2.45)均显著增大,但在获评前后与合作者之间的合作持续时间大都较短,近70%的合作只持续了一年。长江学者在合作中承担的角色发生了显著的变化,在获评后更倾向于担任末位作者(96%)和通讯作者(84%),而不是第一作者。

关键词: 长江学者, 科研合作, 合作角色, 国际合作

Abstract: [Purpose/significance] Scientific cooperation has become a common phenomenon in research activities, and many research projects have also included teamwork in the scope of assessment of implementation effects. Therefore, it is beneficial to the evaluation and sustainable development of the talents projects to explore the changes in the cooperation relationship before and after their receiving the support and explore the role of Cheung Kong Scholars in team building, international and domestic cooperation.[Method/process] In this study, we take the recipients in 2005 of the Cheung Kong Scholars Award as example and take the Wilcoxon signed rank test method to analyze the changes in the cooperative relationship before and after their receiving the award. The cooperative relationship includes the following aspects:the size of the cooperation social network, the strength of cooperation, the duration of cooperation, the role of cooperation, the strength of international and domestic cooperation. The dataset of this study comprised 83 researchers and 11 522 SCI/SSCI papers published between 1996 and 2015, and the analysis was divided into two 10-year periods-the preaward period (1996-2005) and the postaward period (2006-2015).[Result/conclusion] It is found that the Cheung Kong Scholars have played a leading role in team building, international and domestic cooperation after reviving the award. The scholars significantly increased their cooperation social networks (42 VS. 148) and enhanced their cooperation strength (2.17 VS. 2.45) with their partners in the postaward periods. However, the duration of cooperation between the recipients and their collaborators before and after receiving the award was relatively short, and nearly 70% of the cooperation lasted only one year. Moreover, the scholars' coauthorship patterns changed significantly after receiving the award. In both number and proportion, they became less likely to act as the first author, but more likely to be listed as the last author or corresponding author.

Key words: Cheung Kong Scholars, cooperative relationship, role of cooperation, international cooperation

中图分类号: