图书情报工作 ›› 2020, Vol. 64 ›› Issue (8): 71-77.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.08.009

• 工作研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

高校学科期刊资源保障优先级方法与实证分析

张宇娥, 柯佳秀, 杜丽   

  1. 电子科技大学图书馆 成都 611731
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-30 修回日期:2019-11-22 出版日期:2020-04-20 发布日期:2020-04-20
  • 通讯作者: 柯佳秀(ORCID: 0000-0003-3074-1232),助理馆员,硕士,通讯作者,E-mail:chloek@uestc.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:张宇娥(ORCID:0000-0002-6120-8281),副研究馆员,硕士;杜丽(ORCID:0000-0002-0401-1028),教授,博士。

Priority Method and Empirical Analysis of the Subject Journal Collection Guarantee in University Libraries

Zhang Yu'e, Ke Jiaxiu, Du Li   

  1. Library of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731
  • Received:2019-08-30 Revised:2019-11-22 Online:2020-04-20 Published:2020-04-20

摘要: [目的/意义] 构建一种高校学科期刊资源保障优先顺序的统一量化方法,以此开展高校图书馆学科期刊资源保障状况的精细化评价,为其优化与完善提供重要依据,从而助力学校各学科的建设发展。[方法/过程] 首先从学术研究流程中用户的资源利用行为和需求出发,全面系统地梳理出高校学科期刊的建设目标集合;然后对目标集合中期刊的需求相关性和重要性进行量化描述,提出高校学科期刊资源保障优先级方法与计量模型,并应用于电子科技大学ESI生物与生物化学学科的期刊资源评价的实证分析中。[结果/结论] 该方法不仅对高校一个学科需求的每种期刊实现了本馆保障优先级的量化排序,还可进一步量化各全文数据库对该学科期刊的保障支持度,为高校图书馆的学科期刊资源评价工作提供新思路。

关键词: 高校图书馆, 用户需求, 学科期刊资源, 保障优先级, 馆藏资源评价

Abstract: [Purpose/significance] To provide an important reference for the optimization of subject journal collection and to promote the university subjects construction, this paper develops a unified quantitative method for the priority the subject journal collection guarantee in university libraries. And based on this method, it carries out a refined evaluation on the guarantee of subject journal collection in university library. [Method/process] Starting from the user’s resource utilization behavior and needs in the academic research process, this paper made a thorough and systematical combing to the target set of the subjects journals construction. According to the quantitative description of subject journals’ need relevance and importance, it put forward the priority measurement model of subject journal guarantee. Then the model was applied to empirical analysis of journal collection evaluation of ESI biology and biochemistry in University of Electronic Science and Technology. [Result/conclusion] According to the model, this paper not only achieves the quantitative ranking for each journal’s guarantee priority in a subject target collection set, but also further quantifies the support degree of each full-text database for the subject journal, which provides new ideas for the evaluation of subject journal in university libraries.

Key words: university library, user need, subject journal collection, priority of collection guarantee, collection evaluation

中图分类号: