图书情报工作 ›› 2020, Vol. 64 ›› Issue (8): 141-150.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.08.016

• 综述述评 • 上一篇    

国内外政府数据开放中的个人隐私保护研究述评

陈朝兵, 郝文强   

  1. 西南财经大学公共管理学院 成都 611130
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-28 修回日期:2019-10-07 出版日期:2020-04-20 发布日期:2020-04-20
  • 作者简介:陈朝兵(ORCID:0000-0003-3318-7871),副教授,博士,硕士生导师,E-mail:chenchaobing818@163.com;郝文强(ORCID:0000-0002-1856-9647),硕士研究生。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家社会科学基金青年项目"我国基本公共服务质量监测体系构建研究"(项目编号:18CZZ034)研究成果之一。

Review of Domestic and Foreign Research on the Personal Privacy Protection in the Open Government Data

Chen Chaobing, Hao Wenqiang   

  1. School of Public Administration, Southwest University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130
  • Received:2019-07-28 Revised:2019-10-07 Online:2020-04-20 Published:2020-04-20

摘要: [目的/意义] 系统梳理国内外政府数据开放中个人隐私保护的研究文献,旨在为国内该领域的进一步研究提供参考与借鉴。[方法/过程] 运用文献调研法,同时采用归纳、比较、综合等分析方法,从政府数据开放中个人隐私保护的概念、缘由、逻辑悖论、实践困境、实现路径等方面进行综述。[结果/结论] 结果表明,该领域研究总体经历了隐私议题出现、政府信息公开中的个人隐私保护和政府数据开放中的个人隐私保护3个阶段。相关主题的研究取得了较丰硕的成果,跨学科研究特征明显,研究观点既有共识也有分歧。建议国内研究从4个方面展开:拓展研究议题范畴,聚焦关键问题;把握研究问题的复杂性,注重应用系统思维;丰富理论工具的应用,突出研究的过程性和动态性;引入历史、比较等分析方法,加强案例实证研究。

关键词: 政府数据开放, 政府信息公开, 个人隐私, 隐私保护, 文献述评

Abstract: [Purpose/significance] The research literature of personal privacy protection in the opening of government data at home and abroad is systematically combed, aiming to provide reference and reference for further research in this field in China. [Method/process] Using the method of literature research, induction, comparison and synthesis, this paper made a review of the concept, reason, logical paradox, practical dilemma and realization path of individual privacy protection in the opening of government data. [Result/conclusion] The results show that the research in this field has experienced three stages: the emergence of privacy issues, the protection of personal privacy in government information disclosure and the privacy protection of individuals in government data opening. The research on related topics has achieved fruitful results, the characteristics of interdisciplinary research are obvious, and the research points of view are both consensus and differences. It is suggested that the domestic research should be carried out from four aspects: expanding the scope of research topics, focusing on key issues, grasping the complexity of research issues, paying attention to applied systematic thinking, enriching the application of theoretical tools, highlighting the process and dynamics of research, introducing historical, comparative and other analytical methods to strengthen empirical research.

Key words: open government data, government information disclosure, personal privacy, privacy protection, documentary review

中图分类号: