学科交叉研究系统综述

doi:10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.14.012

图书情报工作 ›› 2020, Vol. 64 ›› Issue (14): 112-125.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.14.012

学科交叉研究系统综述

张雪^1,2, 张志强^1,2

1 中国科学院成都文献情报中心成都 610041;
2 中国科学院大学经济与管理学院图书情报与档案管理系北京 100190

收稿日期:2020-01-31 修回日期:2020-03-09 出版日期:2020-07-20 发布日期:2020-07-20
通讯作者: 张志强(ORCID:0000-0001-7323-501X),主任,研究员,博士生导师,通讯作者,E-mail:zhangzq@clas.ac.cn
作者简介:张雪(ORCID:0000-0003-3329-8977),博士研究生。
基金资助:
本文系国家社会科学基金重点项目"面向领域知识发现的学科信息学理论与应用研究"（项目编号：17ATQ008）、中国科学院战略研究与决策支持系统建设专项项目"世界科技发展形势与环境分析"（项目编号：GHJ-ZLZX-2019-43）和中国科学院文献情报能力专项项目"科技领域战略情报研究咨询体系建设" （项目编号：Y9290001）研究成果之一。

Review on Interdisciplinary Research

Zhang Xue^1,2, Zhang Zhiqiang^1,2

1 Chengdu Library and Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041;
2 Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190

Received:2020-01-31 Revised:2020-03-09 Online:2020-07-20 Published:2020-07-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的/意义] 梳理国内外学科交叉相关研究，归纳总结现有研究存在的问题，为评价学科交叉效果提供参考，为促进学科交叉发展提供借鉴。[方法/过程] 首先对学科交叉研究相关概念进行辨析，其次在调研国内外相关研究基础上从学科交叉理论研究（学科交叉人才培养、学科交叉类型、学科交叉内外动机和阻碍因素）、学科交叉测度研究（学科交叉测度方法、学科交叉测度指标）、学科交叉相关规律研究（学科交叉影响双向测度、学科交叉研究主题识别）三个层面对其进行归纳整理，最后提出现有研究不足并对未来发展提出展望，为后续从微观深层分析与宏观整体建构相结合视角的研究提供帮助。[结果/结论] 目前学科交叉研究存在以下不足：师资队伍和课程体系需进一步优化；研究对象多样性有待改善；学科交叉测度方法、测度指标仍需系统化；学科分类体系有待进一步界定；学科交叉双向影响因素不够全面；主题识别方法尚未完善；定性、定量方法需相互结合，互为补充。未来研究可针对以上不足进行深入分析。

关键词: 学科交叉, 理论研究, 交叉度, 影响因素, 主题识别

Abstract: [Purpose/significance] Combing the interdisciplinary research, summarizing the existing research problems, providing references for evaluating the effect of interdisciplinary research and promoting the development of interdisciplinary research. [Method/process] This paper first analyzed the related concepts of interdisciplinary research, and then, on the basis of the research at home and abroad, from the perspectives of interdisciplinary theoretical research(interdisciplinary research in talent development and education, types of interdisciplinary research, internal and external motivation and obstacles of interdisciplinary research), interdisciplinary measurement research(interdisciplinary measurement methods, interdisciplinary measurement indicators), interdisciplinary law research (interdisciplinary research impact two-way measurement, interdisciplinary research topic identification) to summarize it. At the end of the paper, pointing out the existing research deficiencies and putting forward the prospect for the future development. In this research, we can provide help for the follow-up research from the perspective of the combination of micro-deep analysis and macro-overall construction. [Result/conclusion] At present, there are some deficiencies in interdisciplinary research:the faculty and curriculum system need to be further optimized; the diversity of research objects needs to be improved; the interdisciplinary measurement methods and measurement indicators need to be systematized; the subject classification system needs to be further defined; the two-way influencing factors of interdisciplinary are not comprehensive; the subject identification methods are not complete; the qualitative and quantitative methods need to be combined with each other. Future research can be conducted in-depth analysis of the above deficiencies.

Key words: interdisciplinary research, theoretical research, degree of interdisciplinary research, influence factor, topic recognition

中图分类号:

G250

张雪, 张志强. 学科交叉研究系统综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(14): 112-125.

Zhang Xue, Zhang Zhiqiang. Review on Interdisciplinary Research[J]. LIS, 2020, 64(14): 112-125.

参考文献

[1] 国家中长期科学和技术发展规划纲要(2006-2020年)[EB/OL].[2020-03-04]. http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2006/content_240244.htm.
[2] 国家自然科学基金委员会资助格局[EB/OL].[2020-03-04]. http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/publish/portal0/jgsz/08/default.htm#02.
[3] National academies keck futures initiative. Collaborations of consequence:NAKFI's 15 years igniting innovation at the intersections of disciplines[M]. Washington:National Academies Press, 2018.
[4] Interdisciplinary research hubs to address intractable challenges faced by developing countries[EB/OL].[2019-11-04]. https://www.ukri.org/research/global-challenges-research-fund/interdisciplinary-research-hubs-to-address-intractable-challenges-faced-by-developing-countries/.
[5] Crossing borders-interdisciplinary reviews and their effects[EB/OL].[2019-11-04]. https://www.dfg.de/en/service/suche_en/index.jsp?fl=*%2Cscore&rubric=&q=interdisciplinary&head-suche=.
[6] How to promote interdisciplinary research[EB/OL].[2019-11-04]. http://www.cnrs.fr/fr/%3C![CDATA[http://www.cnrs.fr/fr/depasser-les-limites-de-la-connaissance]]%3E.
[7] HCERHE. Evaluation framework for interdisciplinary research units[EB/OL].[2020-03-04]. http://www.heceres.fr/aeres/search? SearchText=referential + d%27evaluation + des + unites + de + recherche + interdisciplinaries &searchRap-ports=%2Faeres% 2Fsearch&reportType% 5B% 5D=all&x=0&y=0.
[8] REF 2021 interdisciplinary research[EB/OL].[2020-03-04]. https://www.ref.ac.uk/about/interdisciplinary-research/.
[9] MIT media lab[EB/OL].[2020-03-04]. https://www.media.mit.edu/about/overview/.
[10] Consortia for improving medicine with innovation & technology[EB/OL].[2020-03-04]. https://cimit.org/about.
[11] 北京大学前沿交叉学科研究院[EB/OL].[2020-03-04]. http://www.aais.pku.edu.cn/about/.
[12] 浙江大学经济学院[EB/OL].[2020-03-04]. http://www.cec.zju.edu.cn/zzjg/list.htm.
[13] 刘小宝. 论"跨学科"的谱系[D]. 合肥:中国科学技术大学, 2013.
[14] 童斌. 跨学科研究与历史学[J]. 国外社会科学, 1979(5):69-78.
[15] 吴维民. 交叉科学研究[M]. 成都:四川大学出版社, 1989.
[16] 路甬祥. 学科交叉与交叉科学的意义[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2005, 20(1):58-60.
[17] 许海云, 尹春晓, 郭婷, 等. 学科交叉研究综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015, 59(5):119-127.
[18] 章成志, 吴小兰. 跨学科研究综述[J]. 情报学报, 2017, 36(5):95-107.
[19] 张琳. 国内外"交叉科学"研究现状及评述[J]. 科技管理研究, 2013, 33(12):258-261.
[20] STOPAR K, DROBNE D, ELER K, et al. Citation analysis and mapping of nanoscience and nanotechnology:identifying the scope and interdisciplinarity of research[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 106(2):563-581.
[21] CUMMINGS J N, KIESLER S. Organization theory and the changing nature of science[J]. Journal of organization design, 2014, 3(3):1-16.
[22] 中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室. 现代汉语词典[M]. 北京:商务印书馆, 2016.
[23] 库恩. 必要的张力:科学的传统和变革论文选[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社, 2004.
[24] 刘仲林. 跨学科学导论[M]. 杭州:浙江教育出版社, 1990.
[25] 刘仲林. 交叉科学时代的交叉研究[J]. 科学学研究, 1993, 11(2):9-16.
[26] ERICH J. Inter- and transdisciplinary university:a systems approach to education and innovation[J]. Policy sciences, 1970, 1(1):403-428.
[27] 中国科学技术培训中心. 迎接交叉科学的时代[M]. 北京:光明日报出版社,1986.
[28] 姜振寰. 交叉科学学科辞典[M]. 北京:人民出版社, 1990.
[29] National Academy of Sciences. Facilitating interdisciplinary research[R]. Washington:National Academies Press, 2004.
[30] RAFOLS I, MEYER M. Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity:case studies in bionanoscience[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 82(2):263-287.
[31] 李江."跨学科性"的概念框架与测度[J]. 图书情报知识, 2014(3):87-93.
[32] 陈其荣, 殷南根. 交叉学科研究与教育:21世纪一流大学的必然选择[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2001, 13(3):44-48.
[33] HALL P, WEAVER L. Interdisciplinary education and teamwork:a long and winding road[J]. Medical education, 2001, 35(9):867-875.
[34] SZOSTAK R. "Comprehensive" curricular reform:providing students with a map of the scholarly enterprise[J]. Journal of general education, 2003, 52(1):27-49.
[35] SINGLETON J K, GREEN-HERNANDEZ C. Interdisciplinary education and practice. has its time come?[J]. The journal of midwifery & women's health, 2011, 43(1):3-7.
[36] ORILLION M F. Interdisciplinary curriculum and student outcomes:the case of a general education course at a research university[J]. Journal of general education, 2009, 58(1):1-18.
[37] 汪丁丁. 转型期社会的跨学科教育问题[J]. 社会科学战线, 2012(7):197-201.
[38] NANCARROW S A, BOOTH A, ARISS S, et al. Ten principles of good interdisciplinary team work[J]. Human resources for health, 2013, 11(1):11-19.
[39] 郑腊香. 跨学科教育——培养国际化人才的有效途径[J]. 经济研究导刊, 2014(18):268-269.
[40] 李春景, 刘仲林. 现代科学发展学科交叉模式探析——一种学科交叉模式的分析框架[J]. 科学学研究, 2004, 22(3):244-248.
[41] 金薇吟. 学科交叉方法探析[J]. 科学学研究, 2006, 24(5):667-671.
[42] KLEIN J. Across the boundaries[J]. Social epistemology, 1990, 4(3):267-280.
[43] 周文娟. 基于诺贝尔自然科学奖的学科交叉研究[D]. 南昌:南昌大学, 2010.
[44] 程如烟. 美国国家科学院协会报告《促进跨学科研究》述评[J]. 中国软科学, 2005(10):154-156.
[45] 马跃, 蔡兵, 于小娟, 等. 交叉学科研究的成长环境与动力机制分析[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2007, 19(5):105-110.
[46] SHRIMPTON B, ASTBURY B. Motivations for doing interdisciplinary research:results from an Australian qualitative study[J]. International journal of interdisciplinary social sciences, 2011, 6(1):195-206.
[47] MILMAN A, MARSTON J M, GODSEY S E, et al. Scholarly motivations to conduct interdisciplinary climate change research[J]. Journal of environmental studies and sciences, 2017, 7(2):239-250.
[48] 郝凤霞, 张春美. 原创性思维的源泉——百年诺贝尔奖获奖者知识交叉背景研究[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2001, 17(9):55-59.
[49] 刘仲林, 赵晓春. 跨学科研究:科学原创性成果的动力之源——以百年诺贝尔生理学和医学奖获奖成果为例[J]. 科学技术哲学研究, 2005, 22(6):105-109.
[50] SUGIMOTO C R, NI C, RUSSELL T G, et al. Academic genealogy as an indicator of interdisciplinarity:an examination of dissertation networks in Library and Information Science[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2014, 62(9):1808-1828.
[51] ABRAMO G, D'ANGELO C A, COSTA F D. Identifying interdisciplinarity through the disciplinary classification of coauthors of scientific publications[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012, 63(11):2206-2222.
[52] WAGNER C S, ROESSNER J D, BOBB K, et al. Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR):a review of the literature[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2011, 5(1):14-26.
[53] 张琳, 孙蓓蓓, 黄颖. 跨学科合作模式下的交叉科学测度研究——以ESI社会科学领域高被引学者为例[J]. 情报学报, 2018, 37(3):231-242.
[54] QIU L. A study of interdisciplinary research collaboration[J]. Research evaluation, 1992, 2(3):169-175.
[55] CHUA A Y K, YANG C C. The shift towards multi-disciplinarity in information science[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008, 59(13):2156-2170.
[56] PORTER A L, COHEN A S, ROESSNER D J, et al. Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity[J]. Scientometrics, 2007, 72(1):117-147.
[57] GOWANLOCK M, GAZAN R. Assessing researcher interdisciplinarity:a case study of the University of Hawaii NASA Astrobiology Institute[J],2013, 94(1):133-161.
[58] QIN J, LANCASTER F W, ALLEN B. Types and levels of collaboration in interdisciplinary research in the sciences[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1997, 48(10):893-916.
[59] 徐晓艺, 杨立英. 科研合作视角下的学科知识流动分析方法研究——以药物化学学科为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(19):83-91.
[60] 杨良斌, 周秋菊, 金碧辉. 基于文献计量的跨学科测度及实证研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2009, 53(10):87-90.
[61] 黄颖, 高天舒, 王志楠, 等. 基于Web of Science分类的跨学科测度研究[J]. 科研管理, 2016, 37(3):124-132.
[62] WANG X F, WANG Z, HUANG Y, et al. Measuring interdisciplinarity of a research system:detecting distinction between publication categories and citation categories[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 111(3):2023-2039.
[63] 黄颖, 张琳, 孙蓓蓓, 等. 跨学科的三维测度——外部知识融合、内在知识会聚与科学合作模式[J]. 科学学研究, 2019, 37(1):27-37.
[64] PORTER A L, ROESSNER J D, COHEN A S, et al. Interdisciplinary research:meaning, metrics and nurture[J]. Research evaluation, 2006, 15(3):187-196.
[65] PORTER A L, RAFOLS I. Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? measuring and mapping six research fields over time[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 81(3):719-745.
[66] STIRLING A. A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society[J]. Journal of the royal society interface, 2007, 4(15):707-719.
[67] LEYDESDORFF L. Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007, 58(9):1303-1319.
[68] ZHANG L, ROUSSEAU R, GLANZEL W. Diversity of references as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of journals:taking similarity between subject fields into account[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016, 67(5):1257-1265.
[69] SZELL M, MA Y, SINATRA R. A Nobel opportunity for Interdisciplinarity[J]. Nature physics, 2018, 14(11):1075-1078.
[70] KRAPIVSKY P L, REDNER S. Network growth by copying[J]. Physical review e, 2005, 71(3):142-154.
[71] CARLEY S, PORTER A L. A forward diversity index[J]. Scientometrics, 2012, 90(2):407-427.
[72] LIU Y, ROUSSEAU R. Knowledge diffusion through publications and citations:a case study using ESI fields as unit of diffusion[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 61(2):340-351.
[73] 童寿传. 中国图书情报学知识扩散的模式及其演化规律——以SSCI论文为例[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2018.
[74] 操玉杰, 毛进, 潘荣清, 等.学科交叉研究的演化阶段特征分析——以医学信息学为例[J].数据分析与知识发现,2019,3(5):107-116.
[75] WANG J, BART T, WOLFGANG G, et al. Interdisciplinarity and impact:distinct effects of variety, balance, and disparity[J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10(5):e0127298.
[76] LEYDESDORFF L, RAFOLS I. Indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals:diversity, centrality, and citations[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2011, 5(1):87-100.
[77] PORTER A L, CHUBIN D E. An indicator of cross-disciplinary research[J]. Scientometrics, 1985, 8(3/4):161-176.
[78] LEYDESDORFF L, RAFOLS I. Indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals:diversity, centrality, and citations[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2011, 5(1):87-100.
[79] HAMERS L, HEMERYCK Y, HERWEYERS G, et al. Similarity measures in scientometric research:the Jaccard index versus Salton's cosine formula[J]. Information processing & management an international journal, 1989, 25(3):315-318.
[80] CHEN K H, LIANG C F. Disciplinary interflow of library and information science in Taiwan[J]. Journal of library & information studies, 2004, 2(2):31-55.
[81] SHANNON C E, WEAVER W. The mathematical theory of communication[J]. Bell labs technical journal, 1950, 3(9):31-32.
[82] SIMPSON E H. Measurement of diversity[J]. Nature, 1949, 163(4148):688.
[83] BRILLOUIN L, HELLWARTH R W. Science and information theory[J]. Physics today, 1956, 9(12):39-40.
[84] GRANT R M, JAMMINE A P, THOMAS H. Diversity, diversification, and profitability among British manufacturing companies[J]. Academy of management journal, 1988, 31(4):771-801.
[85] MONTGOMERY C A, WERNERFELT B. Diversification, ricardian rents, and tobin's q[J]. The RAND journal of economics, 1988, 19(4):623-632.
[86] BROMHAM L, DINNAGE R, HUA X. Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success[J]. Nature, 2016, 534(7609):684-687.
[87] LEYDESDORFF L, WAGNER C S, BORNMANN L. Interdisciplinarity as diversity in citation patterns among journals:Rao-Stirling diversity, relative variety, and the Gini coefficient[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2019, 13(1):255-269.
[88] LEYDESDORFF L. Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007, 58(9):1303-1319.
[89] 李长玲, 纪雪梅, 支岭. 基于E-I指数的学科交叉程度分析——以情报学等5个学科为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2011, 55(16):33-36.
[90] EGGHE L, ROUSSEAU R. BRS-compactness in networks:theoretical considerations related to cohesion in citation graphs, collaboration networks and the Internet[J]. Mathematical and computer modelling, 2003, 37(7/8):879-899.
[91] 陈赛君, 陈智高. 领域交叉性分析指标与方法新探及其实证研究[J]. 情报学报, 2013, 32(11):1184-1195.
[92] 王文平, 刘云, 何颖, 等. 国际科技合作对跨学科研究影响的评价研究——基于文献计量学分析的视角[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(3):127-137.
[93] RHOTEN D, PFIRMAN S. Women in interdisciplinary science:exploring preferences and consequences[J]. Research policy, 2007, 36(1):56-75.
[94] RAFOLS I, MEYER M. How cross-disciplinary is bionanotechnology? explorations in the specialty of molecular motors[J]. Scientometrics, 2007, 70(3):633-650.
[95] RIJNSOEVER F J V, HESSELS L K. Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration[J]. Research policy, 2011, 40(3):463-472.
[96] 李东, 童寿传, 李江. 学科交叉与科学家学术影响力之间的关系研究[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2018, 2(12):5-15.
[97] STEELE T W, STIER J C. The impact of interdisciplinary research in the environmental sciences:a forestry case study[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 2000, 51(5):476-484.
[98] VINCENT L, GINGRAS Y. On the relationship between interdisciplinarity and scientific impact[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 2010, 61(1):126-131.
[99] ALFREDO Y Y, ISMAEL R, D'ESTE P, et al. Does interdisciplinary research lead to higher citation impact? the different effect of proximal and distal interdisciplinarity[J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10(8):1-21.
[100] 王菲菲, 贾晨冉, 刘俊婉,等. 交叉学科中文献学术价值的成长与老化研究——以医学信息学为例[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2018, 39(2):11-22.
[101] CALLON M, COURTIAL J P, LAVILLE F. Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research:the case of polymer chemsitry[J]. Scientometrics, 1991, 22(1):155-205.
[102] 闵超, 孙建军. 基于关键词交集的学科交叉研究热点分析——以图书情报学和新闻传播学为例[J]. 情报杂志, 2014, 33(5):76-82.
[103] 李长玲, 刘非凡, 郭凤娇. 运用重叠社群可视化软件CFinder分析学科交叉研究主题——以情报学和计算机科学为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013, 57(7):75-80.
[104] 隗玲, 许海云, 郭婷,等. 基于弱共现和突发监测的情报学学科研究主题[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015, 59(21):105-114.
[105] DONG K, XU H Y, LUO R, et al. An integrated method for interdisciplinary topic identification and prediction:a case study on information science and library science[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 115(2):849-868.
[106] VAN P, HEIMERIKS G. Mapping research topics using word-reference co-occurrences:a method and an exploratory case study[J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 68(3):377-393.
[107] CHI R, YOUNG J. The interdisciplinary structure of research on intercultural relations:a co-citation network analysis study[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 96(1):147-171.
[108] RAIMBAULT J. Exploration of an interdisciplinary scientific landscape[J]. Scientometrics, 2019, 119(2):617-641.
[109] 韩正琪. 基于主题模型的学科交叉主题识别[D]. 北京:中国科学院大学, 2018.
[110] 魏建香, 孙越泓, 苏新宁. 学科交叉知识挖掘模型研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2012, 35(4):76-80.

学科交叉研究系统综述

Review on Interdisciplinary Research

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	袁红, 王焘. 政府数据开放可持续发展关键影响因素识别与作用机理分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(9): 53-65.
[2]	魏太琛, 刘敏榕, 陈振标. 高校专利技术转移转化价值影响因素实证分析——基于11所一流高校专利转移转化数据[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(9): 103-116.
[3]	胡媛, 陈国东, 姚晓杰, 谢守美. 科研数据管理服务影响因素互作用框架元综合研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(8): 122-133.
[4]	黄崑, 郑明煊, 罗士超, 靳健. 探索式搜索中基于面部表情识别的用户情绪及影响因素研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(5): 93-104.
[5]	廖青云, 李玲, 路璐, 费鹏飞, 邹沐宏. 信息素养教育直播培训的学员专注度影响因素实证研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(3): 65-71.
[6]	翟运开, 张倩, 赵栋祥. 疫情防控常态化下患者双渠道就诊满意度影响因素研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(3): 118-129.
[7]	宋小康, 赵宇翔, 朱庆华. 在线健康信息替代搜寻影响因素研究：基于健康信念模型和社会支持理论[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(2): 45-56.
[8]	黄菡, 王晓光, 王依蒙. 复杂网络视角下的研究主题学科交叉测度研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(19): 99-109.
[9]	金燕, 刘琦, 毕崇武. 研究生学术搜索中的信息规避行为与成因研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(18): 84-94.
[10]	李月琳, 张泰瑞, 李嗣婕. 基于系统性综述的政府信息公开影响因素及实践赋能[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(18): 114-125.
[11]	陈必坤, 刘钰馨, 白宽, 王诗琴, 王曰芬. 基于科学建模的学科交叉测度研究综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(18): 126-139.
[12]	叶莎莎, 杜婉鹏, 杜杏叶. 信息茧房视域下移动知识服务使用影响因素研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(16): 117-124.
[13]	范春竹, 邓小昭, 韩毅. 社交媒体用户消极使用行为：多源数据融合视角[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(15): 76-85.
[14]	梁爽, 刘小平. 基于文本挖掘的科技文献主题演化研究进展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(13): 138-149.
[15]	陈苗苗, 安璐. 突发传染病情境下社会化问答平台用户角色形成及转变——以知乎平台为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(12): 68-81.