人文社科专著众筹OA出版发展现状和思考——以Open Book Publishers和Knowledge Unlatched为例

doi:10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.22.008

图书情报工作 ›› 2020, Vol. 64 ›› Issue (22): 77-84.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.22.008

人文社科专著众筹OA出版发展现状和思考——以Open Book Publishers和Knowledge Unlatched为例

徐志玮

天津理工大学图书馆天津 300384

收稿日期:2020-05-15 修回日期:2020-09-02 出版日期:2020-11-20 发布日期:2020-11-20
作者简介:徐志玮(0000-0001-5808-345X),副研究馆员,硕士,E-mail:juliexu@sina.com。
基金资助:
本文系2018年天津市哲学社会科学规划研究项目"美国高校iSchool和图书馆的数字人文理论和实践研究"（项目编号：TJTQ18-007）研究成果之一。

Development Status and Thinking of OA Publication of Humanities and Social Sciences Monographs——Take Open Book Publishers and Knowledge Unlatched as Examples

Xu Zhiwei

Tianjin University of Technology Library, Tianjin 300384

Received:2020-05-15 Revised:2020-09-02 Online:2020-11-20 Published:2020-11-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的/意义] 梳理人文社科专著众筹OA出版的发展现状，分析具有公益性特点的OA出版物和具有商业性特点的众筹出版所引起的冲突，以期对学术专著众筹出版提出有价值的思考。[方法/过程] 从发起者、投资者和众筹平台3个基本要素梳理Open Book Publishers和Knowledge Unlatched的众筹模式，比较异同点，探讨两者在竞争中引起的问题。[结果/结论] 目前，欧美国家的学术专著众筹出版分为高校、众筹商和OA出版社3种模式。Knowledge Unlatched是期望通过对图书馆的优质服务获得收益的众筹商，Open Book Publishers是借助网络开展众筹出版的OA出版社，两者属于商业化大型公司和非营利性OA出版社的竞争关系，在OA出版物的商业化开发、财务公开透明、垄断性的销售模式和审核制度方面值得高度关注。

关键词: 众筹出版, 人文社科专著, Open Book Publisher, Knowledge Unlatched, 高校OA出版社, 众筹商

Abstract: [Purpose/significance] Sort out the development status of the crowdfunding OA publications in the humanities and social sciences monographs, and discuss the problems caused by public welfare OA publications and crowdfunding business activities, in order to put forward valuable thoughts on the future academic monograph crowdfunding publications.[Method/process] From the three basic elements of initiators, investors and crowdfunding platforms, this paper sorted out the crowdfunding models of Open Book Publishers and Knowledge Unlatched, compared the similarities and differences, and discussed the problems caused by the competition between the two.[Result/conclusion] At present, the publication of academic monograph crowdfunding in European and American countries is roughly divided into three modes:colleges, crowdfunders, and OA publishing houses. Knowledge Unlatched is a crowdfunder who expects to obtain revenue through the high-quality service of the library. Open Book Publishers uses the Internet to conduct crowdfunding publishing OA Press. Both of them belong to the competitive relationship between large commercial companies and non-profit OA Press, and they are worthy of high attention in the commercial development of OA publications, financial transparency, monopoly sales model and audit system.

Key words: crowdfunding publishing, humanities and social sciences monographs, Open Book Publishers, Knowledge Unlatched, universities/colleges, open access publisher, crowdfunders

中图分类号:

徐志玮. 人文社科专著众筹OA出版发展现状和思考——以Open Book Publishers和Knowledge Unlatched为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(22): 77-84.

Xu Zhiwei. Development Status and Thinking of OA Publication of Humanities and Social Sciences Monographs——Take Open Book Publishers and Knowledge Unlatched as Examples[J]. LIS, 2020, 64(22): 77-84.

参考文献

[1] Open Book Publishers. Open Book Publishers' statement on Knowledge Unlatched and the Open Research Library[EB/OL].[2020-01-06].https://blogs.openbookpublishers.com/open-book-publishers-statement-on-knowledge-unlatched-and-the-open-research-library/.
[2] DODDS F. The future of academic publishing:Revolution or evolution revisited[J]. Learned publishing, 2019, 32(4):345-354.
[3] SARA G, CATHY H, PETER P, et al. The state of open monographs:an analysis of the open access monograph landscape and its integration into the digital scholarly network[EB/OL].[2020-04-25].https://www.digital-science.com/resources/white-papers/the-state-of-open-monographs/.
[4] JANNEKE A. Towards a roadmap for open access monographs a knowledge exchange report[EB/OL].[2020-08-27].https://www.infodocket.com/2019/05/30/new-report-towards-a-roadmap-for-open-access-monographs/.
[5] JOBMANN A, SCHNFELDER N. The transcript OPEN library political science model:a sustainable way into open access for E-Books in the humanities and social sciences[J]. Publications, 2019,7(3):55.
[6] REINSFELDER T L, PIKE C A. Using library funds to support open access publishing through crowdfunding:going beyond article processing charges[J]. Collection management, 2018, 43(7):1-12.
[7] CHRIS B. Crowdfunding for open access[J]. Serials review, 2018,44(2):138-141.
[8] 魏蕊,初景利.国外开放获取图书出版模式研究[J].图书情报工作,2013,57(11):12-18.
[9] 郑雯译,侯壮.国外人文社科学术图书开放出版模式研究[J].图书情报工作,2016,60(11):53-59.
[10] 隗静秋,隗玮.国外开放获取图书出版商业模式研究[J].科技与出版,2016(1):62-66.
[11] 李瑾,盛小平.利益视角下的学术图书开放获取出版模式研究[J].图书情报工作,2017,61(3):39-46.
[12] 朱本军,龙世彤,肖珑,等.图书开放获取模式及整合利用研究[J].大学图书馆学报,2015,33(5):26-31.
[13] 张建中,夏亚梅.Freemium出版:专著开放获取的未来[J].科技与出版,2018(8):118-121.
[14] 魏蕊.OAPEN学术专著开放获取研究与实践进展述评[J].图书情报工作,2017,61(9):135-144.
[15] 宁圣红.学术图书开放获取新模式:Knowledge Unlatched[J].图书馆论坛,2015,35(7):14-20.
[16] 任翔.开放获取能否拯救学术专著出版?[J].出版广角,2013(23):20-22.
[17] 马瑞洁.众筹能否出版?——关于众筹出版的价值反思[J].编辑学刊,2015(3):16-20.
[18] 王慧,徐丽芳.Unglue.it:众筹出版界的理想主义者[J].出版参考,2014(28):19-20.
[19] Open Book Publishers. Introducing data to the Open Access Debate:OBP's business model (Part Three)[EB/OL].[2020-04-01].https://blogs.openbookpublishers.com/introducing-data-to-the-open-access-debate-obps-business-model-part-three/.
[20] Open Book Publishers. The cost of Open Access Books:a publisher writes[EB/OL].[2020-08-28].https://blogs.openbookpublishers.com/the-cost-of-open-access-books-a-publisher-writes/.
[21] LAWSON S, GRAY J. Opening the black box of scholarly communication funding:a public data infrastructure for financial flows in academic publishing[J]. Open library of humanities, 2016(2):1-35.
[22] 杨霞.被误读的学术编辑——兼谈学术编辑的职业特性[J].科技与出版,2018(8):44-47.
[23] MARON N, SCHMELZINGER K, MULHERN C, et al. The costs of publishing monographs:toward a transparent methodology[EB/OL].[2020-05-04].https://sr.ithaka.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/SR_Report_Costs_Publishing_Monographs020516.pdf.

人文社科专著众筹OA出版发展现状和思考——以Open Book Publishers和Knowledge Unlatched为例

Development Status and Thinking of OA Publication of Humanities and Social Sciences Monographs——Take Open Book Publishers and Knowledge Unlatched as Examples

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	鞠孜涵, 白如江, 张玉洁, 王志民. 数字人文视域下古籍数据库建设关键技术研究——兼评稷下学文献资料数据库的建设思路[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(19): 4-14.
[2]	张玉洁, 白如江, 张亚辉, 冯梦莹, 鞠孜涵, 邢莹. 追溯现代精神文明的古典参照:基于稷下学数字人文研究视角[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(19): 15-25.
[3]	冯梦莹, 白如江, 张玉洁, 王效岳, 耿振东, 王志民. 面向数字人文的稷下思想自动分类研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(19): 26-35.
[4]	黄永文, 孙坦, 赵瑞雪, 鲜国建, 李娇, 罗婷婷. 大数据与人工智能背景下新型知识服务研究与实践[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(19): 36-46.
[5]	马捷, 栾泽权, 蒲泓宇, 郝志远. 数据协同视域下元宇宙政务模型构建[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(19): 47-60.
[6]	梁兴堃, 陈诺. 图书馆焦虑的测量、前因和后果——基于高校图书馆用户的实证研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(19): 61-71.
[7]	孙媛媛, 李书宁. 接受美学视域下的高校图书馆艺术阅读推广服务模式研究——以北京师范大学图书馆为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(19): 84-91.
[8]	袁建霞, 冷伏海, 黄龙光, 边文越, 王海霞. 科技前沿方向的情报监测分析与综合研判方法探讨[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(19): 92-98.
[9]	黄菡, 王晓光, 王依蒙. 复杂网络视角下的研究主题学科交叉测度研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(19): 99-109.
[10]	吕鲲, 陈箫羽, 靖继鹏. 基于组合分词方法和LDA模型的区块链金融产业关键技术识别研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(19): 110-121.
[11]	庞弘燊, 钟秀梅. 颠覆性技术产生过程的多源数据多特征项可视化研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(19): 122-131.
[12]	陆颖颖, 孙裕彤, 张瑶, 李旭光. 人工智能、机器学习、自动化和机器人技术对信息行业的影响——2021年CILIP专题研讨会综述与启示[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(19): 143-152.
[13]	李猛力, 初景利, 李楠. 党领导下的图书情报事业:追溯与思考[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(18): 3-10.
[14]	郭若涵, 徐拥军. 数字文化遗产协同治理:逻辑框架、案例审视与实现路径[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(18): 11-22.
[15]	刘芳兵, 夏翠娟, 杨新涯. 高校数字记忆项目建设策略研究——以重庆大学数字记忆项目方案设计为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(18): 31-39.