图书情报工作 ›› 2021, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (11): 143-152.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.11.015
• 综述述评 • 上一篇
丁敬达, 郑巧, 刘超
收稿日期:
2020-12-28
修回日期:
2021-03-01
出版日期:
2021-06-05
发布日期:
2021-06-10
作者简介:
丁敬达(ORCID:0000-0002-4075-8604),教授,博士,E-mail:djdhyn@126.com;郑巧(ORCID:0000-0003-0684-9884),硕士研究生;刘超(ORCID:0000-0002-9333-7838),博士研究生。
Ding Jingda, Zheng Qiao, Liu Chao
Received:
2020-12-28
Revised:
2021-03-01
Online:
2021-06-05
Published:
2021-06-10
摘要: [目的/意义] 梳理软件引用及其规范的理论和实践现状,分析存在的困难和问题,促进软件引用规范和标准的建立。[方法/过程] 通过文献调研,得出软件引用面临接受文化、奖励制度、引用认知和元数据4个方面挑战,分析国内外为应对挑战对软件引用及其规范的理论探索和实践进展。[结果/结论] 软件引用利益相关者分析、软件引用原则和元数据标准等理论探索以及国际研究组织和社区的引用指南、相关项目和知识库的支持、人员培训、贡献分配和奖励计划的实施、软件引用文件的提供等实践为软件引用规范的建立奠定了良好的基础,但尚需软件引用利益相关者通力协作、共同克服面对的困难和挑战。S
中图分类号:
丁敬达, 郑巧, 刘超. 软件引用及其规范的理论探索和实践进展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(11): 143-152.
Ding Jingda, Zheng Qiao, Liu Chao. Theoretical Exploration and Practical Progress of Software Citation and Its Specification[J]. Library and Information Service, 2021, 65(11): 143-152.
[1] 软件[EB/OL]. [2020-12-15]. https://bk.tw.lvfukeji.com/baike-软件. [2] 潘雪莲. 软件实体的自动抽取和学术影响力研究[D]. 南京:南京大学,2016:9. [3] 中国国家标准化管理委员会.信息与文献 参考文献著录规则 GB/T 7714-2015[S/OL].[2020-06-03]. http://www.gs.fudan.edu.cn/_upload/article/files/e2/3e/0197d0d64cbea9d9fae9a668329f/b9a3a4c2-1e6f-4e81-9974-36eb01635471.pdf. [4] HEINLE A, KOEPF W, SPERBER W. Some steps to improve software information [J]. ACM communications in computer algebra, 2017, 51(1): 1-11. [5] 崔明,潘雪莲,华薇娜. 我国图书情报领域的软件使用和引用研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2018, 44(3): 66-78. [6] 杨波,王雪,佘曾溧. 生物信息学文献中的软件利用行为研究[J]. 情报学报, 2016, 35(11): 1140-1147. [7] 杨波,王雪,苏娜. 不同文献集中中国学者引用软件和数据集的特征比较研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(14): 109-115. [8] HWANG L, FISH A, SOITO L, et al. Software and the scientist: Coding and citation practices in geodynamics [J]. Earth and space science, 2017, 4(11): 670-680. [9] WOFFORD M F, BOSCOE B M, BORGMAN C L, et al. Jupyter notebooks as discovery mechanisms for open science: citation practices in the astronomy community [J]. Computing in science & engineering,2020, 22(1): 5-15. [10] PAN X,YAN E,HUA W. Disciplinary differences of software use and impact in scientific literature [J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 109(3): 1593-1610. [11] PAN X,YAN E,CUI M, et al. How important is software to library and information science research? a content analysis of full-text publications [J]. Journal of informetrics, 2019, 13(1): 397-406. [12] HOWISON J, BULLARD J. Software in the scientific literature: Problems with seeing, finding, and using software mentioned in the biology literature [J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016, 67(9): 2137-2155. [13] 于晓彤,潘雪莲,华薇娜. 知识图谱研究中软件引用和扩散分析[J]. 情报资料工作, 2019, 40(2): 19-29. [14] PAN X, YAN E, CUI M, et al. Examining the usage, citation, and diffusion patterns of bibliometric mapping software: a comparative study of three tools [J]. Journal of informetrics,2018, 12(2):481-493. [15] 于晓彤,潘雪莲,华薇娜. 基于内容分析法的开源软件使用与引用研究[J]. 图书情报研究, 2020, 13(1): 101-107,121. [16] LI K, CHEN P-Y, YAN E. Challenges of measuring software impact through citations: an examination of the lme4 R package [J]. Journal of informetrics, 2019, 13(1): 449-461. [17] LI K, YAN E, FENG Y. How is R cited in research outputs? Structure, impacts, and citation standard [J]. Journal of informetrics, 2017, 11(4): 989-1002. [18] LI K, YAN E. Co-mention network of R packages: Scientific impact and clustering structure [J]. Journal of informatrics, 2018, 12(1): 87-100. [19] 赵蓉英,魏明坤,汪少震. 基于Altmetrics的开源软件学术影响力评价研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2017, 43(2): 80-95. [20] ZHAO R, WEI M. Impact evaluation of open source software: an altmetrics perspective [J]. Scientometrics, 2017(110): 1017-1033. [21] PAN X, YAN E, WANG Q, et al. Assessing the impact of software on science: a bootstrapped learning of software entities in full-text papers [J]. Journal of informetrics, 2015, 9(4): 860-871. [22] SILVA R. Measuring behaviour 2018 [EB/OL]. [2020-12-01]. https://www.software.ac.uk/blog/2018-06-22-measuring-behaviour-2018. [23] HANNAY J E, MACLEOD C, SINGER J, et al. How do scientists develop and use scientific software? [C]//Proceedings of the 2009 ICSE workshop on software engineering for computational science and engineering. Piscataway: IEEE Computer Society, 2009: 1-8. [24] PRABHU P, JABLIN T B, RAMAN A, et al. A survey of the practice of computational science[EB/OL]. [2020-12-15]. https://www.cs.princeton.edu/~dpw/papers/survey-sc11.pdf. [25] HOWISON J, HERBSLEB J. The sustainability of scientific software: ecosystem context and science policy[EB/OL]. [2020-12-15]. http://james.howison.name/pubs/HowisonHerbsleb-Sustainability.pdf. [26] SMITH A M, NIEMEYER K E, KATZ D S, et al.Design and first-year review[J/OL]. Journal of open source software[2021-05-20].https://peerj.com/articles/cs-147.pdf. [27] CHAWLA D S. The unsung heroes of scientific software[J]. Nature, 2016, 529(7584): 115-116. [28] HWANG L, FISH A, SOITO L, et al. Software and the scientist: coding and citation practices in geodynamics [J]. Earth and space science, 2017, 4(11): 670-680. [29] RIOS F. Preserving and sharing software for transparent and reproducible research: a review [EB/OL]. [2020-12-20]. https://osf.io/d4kef/. [30] PARK H, WOLFRAM D. Research software citation in the Data Citation Index: current practices and implications for research software sharing and reuse [J]. Journal of informetrics, 2019(13): 574-582. [31] HOWISON J, HERBSLEB J D. Scientific software production: incentives and collaboration [C/OL]. [2020-12-10]. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1958824.1958904. [32] HWANG L J, PAULOO R A, CARLEN J. Assessing the impact of outreach through software citation for community software in geodynamics [J]. Computing in science and engineering, 2020, 22(1): 16-25. [33] LI K, CHEN P-Y, YAN E. Challenges of measuring software impact through citations: an examination of the lme4 R package [J]. Journal of informetrics, 2019, 13(1): 449-461. [34] 史雅莉. 科学数据引用标准实施的关键问题探析[J]. 现代情报, 2019, 39(4): 34-41. [35] NIEMEYER K E, SMITH A M, KATZ D S. The challenge and promise of software citation for credit, identification, discovery, and reuse[J]. Journal of data and information quality, 2016, 7(4): e16. [36] DING Y, SONG M, HAN J, et al. Measuring the impact of entities[J]. PLOS one, 2013, 8(8): e71416. [37] DING Y, ZHANG G, CHAMBERS T, et al. Content-based citation analysis: the next generation of citation analysis[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 65(9): 1820-1833. [38] YU Q, DING Y, SONG M, et al. Tracing database usage: Detecting main paths in database link networks [J]. Journal of informetrics, 2015, 9(1): 1-15. [39] BARTZAS A, PEON-QUIROS M, POUCET C, et al. Software metadata: systematic characterization of the memory behaviour of dynamic applications [J]. Journal of systems and software, 2010, 83(6): 1051-1075. [40] SOCIAS S M, MORIN A, TIMONY M A, et al. AppCiter: a web application for increasing rates and accuracy of scientific software citation [J]. Structure, 2015, 23(5): 807-808. [41] THE CODEMETA PROJECT [EB/OL]. [2020-12-26]. https://codemeta.github.io/index.html. [42] COSMO R D, GRUENPETER M, ZACCHIROLI S. Referencing source code artifacts: a separate concern in software citation [J]. Computing in science and engineering, 2020, 22(2): 33-43. [43] 崔佳伟, 吴思竹, 邬金鸣, 等. 科学数据仓储元数据标准研究与启示[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2019(6): 19-28. [44] TENOPIR C, ALLARD S, DOUGLASS K, et al. Data sharing by scientists: practices and perceptions [J]. PLos one, 2011, 6(6): 1-21. [45] 浦燕妮, 刘琪, 耿骞. 通用型科学元数据标准研究[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2016(12): 33-39. [46] KATZ D S, BOUQUIN D, CHUE HONG N P, et al. Software citation implementation challenges [EB/OL]. [2020-12-30]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.08674. [47] DRUSKAT S. Software and dependencies in research citation graphs [J]. Computing in science & engineering, 2020, 22(2): 8-21. [48] HENNEKEN E, DEVELOPER A. Asclepias - Enabling software citation & discovery workflows [EB/OL]. [2020-04-06]. https://adsabs.github.io/blog/asclepias. [49] HENNEKEN E, ACCOMAZZI A, BLANCO-CUARESMA S, et al. Asclepias-Capturing software citations in astronomy[EB/OL].[2020-10-08].http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1011088. [50] HENNEKEN E A, ADS T. Capturing software citations in astronomy and planetary sciences [EB/OL]. [2020-10-09]. https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2019/pdf/1569.pdf. [51] ALLEN A, BERRIMAN G B, DUPRIE K, et al. Improving software citation and credit [EB/OL]. [2020-10-20]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.07919. [52] 盛小平, 王毅. 利益相关者在科学数据开放共享中的责任与作用——基于国际组织科学数据开放共享政策的分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(17): 31-39. [53] 张丽丽, 黎建辉. 数据引用的相关利益者分析[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2014(7): 44-47. [54] 孟祥保, 高凡. 利益相关者视角下科研数据战略规划研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(9): 38-44. [55] SMITH A M, KATZ D S, NIEMEYER K E, et al. Software citation principles [J]. PeerJ Computer Science, 2016, 2: e86. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.86. [56] 完颜邓邓. 国外科学数据仓储元数据实践调查及启示[J]. 新世纪图书馆, 2016(5): 81-84. [57] 司莉, 贾欢. 科学数据的标准规范体系框架研究[J]. 图书馆, 2016(5): 5-9. [58] 刘峰, 张晓林. 科学数据元数据标准述评及其通用化设计研究[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2015(12): 3-12. [59] 梁冰, 王莉. 关于国家科技管理信息系统标准体系建设的思考[J]. 情报学报, 2016, 35(9): 911-916. [60] 司莉, 赵洁. 美国开放政府数据元数据标准及启示[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(3): 86-93. [61] HSU C N, BANDROWSKI A E, GILLESPIE T H, et al. Comparing the use of research resource identi?ers and natural language processing for citation of databases, software, and other digital artifacts [J]. Computing in science & engineering, 2020, 22(2): 22-32. [62] BALL A, DUKE M. ‘How to track the impact of research data with metrics’. DCC how-to guides [EB/OL]. [2020-12-15]. https://www.dcc.ac.uk/guidance/how-guides/track-data-impact-metrics. [63] DRUSKAT S. Citation file format -core module (CFF-Core)[EB/OL]. [2020-11-20]. https://zenodo.org/record/1108269#.XsibSfZuLIU. [64] Working towards sustainable software for science: practice and experiences. Proceedings [EB/OL]. [2020-11-26]. http://wssspe.researchcomputing.org.uk/proceedings/. [65] FORCE 11. Attribution working group[EB/OL].[2020-11-26]. https://www.force11.org/group/attributionwg. [66] FORCE 11. FORCE11-RDA joint software source code identification working group [EB/OL]. [2020-11-26]. https://www.force11.org/group/force11-rda-joint-software-source-code-identification-working-group. [67] FORCE 11. Software citation working group [EB/OL]. [2020-11-26]. https://www.force11.org/group/software-citation-working-group. [68] FORCE 11. Software citation implementation working group [EB/OL]. [2020-11-26]. https://www.force11.org/group/software-citation-implementation-working-group. [69] Software Sustainability Institute. Other workshops[EB/OL]. [2020-11-26]. https://www.software.ac.uk/programmes-and-events/other-workshops. [70] American Astronomical Society. Policy statement on software [EB/OL]. [2020-11-26]. https://journals.aas.org/policy-statement-on-software/. [71] SWMATH[EB/OL]. [2020-11-26]. http://www.swmath.org/. [72] HSL. A collection of Fortran codes for large scale scientific computation [EB/OL]. [2020-11-26]. http://www.hsl.rl.ac.uk/. [73] WHITE O, DHAR A, BONAZZI V, et al. NIH software discovery index meeting report [R/OL]. [2020-11-20]. http://www.softwarediscoveryindex.org/. [74] The journal of open source software [EB/OL]. [2020-11-26]. https://joss.theoj.org/. [75] The journal of open research software [EB/OL]. [2020-11-26]. https://openresearchsoftware.metajnl.com/j. [76] SOFTWAREX [EB/OL]. [2020-11-26]. https://www.journals.elsevier.com/softwarex/. [77] THE CODEMETA PROJECT [EB/OL]. [2020-11-26]. https://codemeta.github.io/index.html. [78] SHOULDACITE [EB/OL]. [2020-11-23]. https://mr-c.github.io/shouldacite/. [79] COLLABORATIONS WORKSHOP 16 [EB/OL]. [2020-11-24]. https://www.software.ac.uk/cw16. [80] DEPSY [EB/OL]. [2020-11-26]. https://github.com/ourresearch/depsy. [81] IMPACTSTORY [EB/OL]. [2020-11-26]. https://github.com/ourresearch/impactstory-tng. [82] GITHUB [EB/OL]. [2020-11-26]. https://github.com/. [83] DATACITE [EB/OL]. [2020-11-26]. https://datacite.org/. [84] GIL Y, RATNAKAR V, GARIJO D. OntoSoft: capturing scientific software metadata[C/OL]. [2020-11-30]. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2815833.2816955. [85] CITEAS [EB/OL]. [2020-11-29]. http://www.citeas.org/. [86] HEIBI I, PERONI S, SHOTTON D. Software review: COCI, the open citations index of Crossref open DOI-to-DOI citations [J]. Scientometrics, 2019, 121(2): 1213-1228. [87] MOZILLA SCIENCE LAB. Code as a rresearch object [EB/OL]. [2020-11-26]. http://mozillascience.github.io/code-research-object/. [88] Software Carpentry [EB/OL]. [2021-01-03]. https://software-carpentry.org/. [89] WILSON G. Software carpentry: lessons learned [version 2; peer review: 3 approved] [EB/OL]. [2020-11-18]. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.3-62.v2. [90] Training for Centres for Doctoral Training[EB/OL].[2021-01-03]. https://www.software.ac.uk/programmes-and-events/carpentry-programmes/tailored-carpentry-workshops/training-centres-doctoral. [91] The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council[EB/OL].[2021-01-03]. https://epsrc.ukri.org/. [92] CASRAI. CRediT[EB/OL]. [2021-01-03]. https://casrai.org/credit/. [93] HOWISON J, HERBSLEB J D. Incentives and integration in scientific software production [C]//http://dio.org/10.1145/2441776. 2441828. [94] GRANT R. Life after my Fellowship [EB/OL].[2021-01-02]. https://www.software.ac.uk/blog/2018-12-19-life-after-my-fellowship. [95] ARNOLD B. Christopher Woods: how to design and engineer good code for research [EB/OL].[2021-01-02]. https://www.software.ac.uk/blog/2019-03-11-christopher-woods-how-design-and-engineer-good-code-research. [96] Society OF Research Software Engineering. RSE Fellows [EB/OL]. [2021-01-04]. https://society-rse.org/community/rse-fellows/. [97] LAIRD J. Applications open for Better Scientific Software (BSSw) Fellowship Program [EB/OL].[2021-01-02]. https://www.software.ac.uk/news/applications-open-better-scientific-software-bssw-fellowship-program. [98] ARAGON S. US applicants sought for the 2019 Better Scientific Software (BSSw) Fellowship Programme[EB/OL].[2021-01-02]. https://www.software.ac.uk/news/us-applicants-sought-2019-better-scientific-software-bssw-fellowship-programme. [99] WILSON R. Encouraging citation of software - introducing CITATION files [EB/OL]. [2020-12-25]. https://www.software.ac.uk/blog/2016-10-06-encouraging-citation-software-introducing-citation-files. [100] DRUSKAT S, SPAAKS J H, STRUCK A. Hacking software citation implementation: the citation file format hack day at RSE18[EB/OL].[2021-12-27]. https://www.software.ac.uk/blog/2018-10-02-hacking-software-citation-implementation-citation-file-format-hack-day-rse18. [101] DRUSKAT S. Track 2 lightning talk: should CITATION files be standardized? [EB/OL]. [2020-12-27]. https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Track_2_Lightning_Talk_Should_CITATION_files_be_standardized_/3827058. [102] citation-file-format/citation-file-format[EB/OL].[2020-12-28]. https://github.com/citation-file-format/citation-file-format#tools. [103] SPAAKS J H, VERHOEVEN S, KLAVER T, et al. The research software directory and how it promotes software citation - Improve the findability, citability, and reproducibility of research software [EB/OL].[2020-12-29]. https://www.software.ac.uk/blog/2018-12-17-research-software-directory-and-how-it-promotes-software-citation-improve. |
[1] | 李昕雨, 雷佳琪, 步一. 我国图书情报学作者自引行为研究初探[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(20): 162-171. |
[2] | 黄永文, 孙坦, 赵瑞雪, 鲜国建, 李娇, 罗婷婷. 大数据与人工智能背景下新型知识服务研究与实践[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(19): 36-46. |
[3] | 王萍, 周霞, 李依凝, 黄新平, 陈为东. 国外政府网络存档项目比较与借鉴[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(17): 15-24. |
[4] | 梁爽, 刘小平. 基于文本挖掘的科技文献主题演化研究进展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(13): 138-149. |
[5] | 张雪, 张志强, 曹玲静, 阮伟南, 任晓亚, 冯志刚. 学科领域研究前沿识别方法研究进展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(12): 139-151. |
[6] | 赵瑞雪, 刘敏娟, 王鸑飞, 卢垚, 马鑫, 刘洪冰, 颜蕴. 国家农业图书馆资源建设发展与展望[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(10): 107-113. |
[7] | 魏太琛, 刘敏榕, 陈振标. 高校专利技术转移转化价值影响因素实证分析——基于11所一流高校专利转移转化数据[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(9): 103-116. |
[8] | 季梵, 李峰. 数字校园建设背景下高校文献信息资源精准服务模式探究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(6): 60-66. |
[9] | 柯佳秀, 张宇娥, 杜丽. 全学科统筹视角下高校期刊资源的保障优先级计量研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(4): 87-94. |
[10] | 温亮明, 李洋, 郭蕾. 国内外开放科学的实践进展与未来探索[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(24): 109-122. |
[11] | 黄永文, 孙坦, 赵瑞雪, 鲜国建, 李娇, 罗婷婷. 科学数据与学术文献关联服务的研究与实现[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(23): 116-125. |
[12] | 王学昭, 赵萍, 赵亚娟, 吕璐成. “技术-功效”视角下的专利布局形势揭示与风险判定[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(16): 73-80. |
[13] | 周霞, 王萍, 张韫麒, 宋婧馨, 陈为东. 数据故事化实践应用分析——以数据新闻为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(14): 119-127. |
[14] | 张云中, 刘嘉琳. 智慧数据研究综述:概念辨析、价值取向、关键技术与应用框架[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(10): 141-150. |
[15] | 肖鹏, 衣春波. 万华镜里的自画像:关于中国人文学者数字学术认知与需求的质性研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(7): 4-14. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||