图书情报工作 ›› 2021, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (12): 83-92.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.12.008

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国学术期刊话语权评价理论框架建构研究

王旭   

  1. 燕山大学经济管理学院 秦皇岛 066004 武汉大学中国科学评价研究中心 武汉 430072
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-09 修回日期:2021-03-28 出版日期:2021-06-20 发布日期:2021-07-03
  • 作者简介:王旭(ORCID:0000-0002-8789-7951),博士,硕士生导师,E-mail:1542746344@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家社会科学基金重大项目"构建中国话语权的评价科学理论、方法与应用体系研究"(项目编号:18ZDA325)和河北省高等学校人文社会科学研究基金青年项目"多元融合视域下中国学术期刊话语权评价研究"(项目编号:SQ2021119)研究成果之一。

Research on the Theoretical Framework Construction of Discourse Power Evaluation for Chinese Academic Journals

Wang Xu   

  1. School of Economics and Management, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004 Research Center for Chinese Science Evaluation, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072
  • Received:2020-12-09 Revised:2021-03-28 Online:2021-06-20 Published:2021-07-03

摘要: [目的/意义] 开放科学背景下,学术期刊话语权评价研究有助于丰富和完善中国特色学术期刊评价理论与指标体系,促进中国特色话语体系的建设。[方法/过程] 依据评价科学理论、话语权理论和传播学理论,按照"理论、方法与应用"的思路,对学术期刊话语权评价理论框架进行建构研究,并提出从多维度、多要素、多指标、多方法融合评价学术期刊话语权的设想。[结果/结论] 探讨学术期刊话语权评价的基本问题,并融合带有浓厚中国元素和国际元素的科学计量指标和Altmetrics指标以实现对传统评价指标的拓展和体系重构,进而科学评价中国学术期刊话语权。同时,对这一新课题应继续深入研究,以更好地服务"三大体系"建设。

关键词: 中国学术期刊, 话语权评价, 话语影响力, 话语引导力, 科学计量学, Altmetrics

Abstract: [Purpose/significance] Under the background of open science, the research on the evaluation of discourse power of academic journals plays an active role in enriching and improving the theory and indicator system of academic journals evaluation with Chinese features and accelerating the construction of the discourse system with Chinese features.[Method/process] Based on the theory of evaluation science, discourse power and communication, and according to the thought of "theory, method and application", this paper constructed the theoretical framework of discourse power evaluation for academic journals. This paper also put forward a tentative plan to evaluate the discourse power of Chinese academic journals from the perspectives of multi-dimensions, multi-factors, multi-indicators, multi-methods integration.[Result/conclusion] This paper discussed the basic theoretical issues of the discourse power of academic journals, and combines scientometrics and Altmetrics with strong Chinese and international elements to expand the traditional evaluation indicators and reconstruct the system, so as to scientifically evaluate the discourse power of Chinese academic journals. At the same time, this new topic should be further studied, so as to serve the construction of the "three systems" better.

Key words: Chinese academic journals, discourse power evaluation, discourse influence, discourse leading, scientometrics, altmetrics

中图分类号: