何因生倦怠,何素调节之？——一项关于社交媒体倦怠的元分析研究

doi:10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.13.004

图书情报工作 ›› 2021, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (13): 31-43.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.13.004

何因生倦怠,何素调节之？——一项关于社交媒体倦怠的元分析研究

徐颖¹, 于雨禾¹, 张桓森^1,2

1. 吉林大学管理学院长春 130022;
2. 吉林外国语大学国际经济贸易学院长春 130117

收稿日期:2020-12-23 修回日期:2021-02-28 出版日期:2021-07-05 发布日期:2021-07-10
通讯作者: 于雨禾(ORCID:0000-0002-9762-5044),博士研究生,通讯作者,E-mail:yuyuhe0130@163.com
作者简介:徐颖(ORCID:0000-0001-8473-4455),教授,博士生导师;张桓森(ORCID:0000-0002-0869-4655),博士研究生。
基金资助:
本文吉林省科技战略与规划项目"吉林省高质量数字乡村的建设路径与对策研究"（项目编号：20200101134FG）研究成果之一。

What Can Produce Fatigue? What Factors Regulate It?——A Meta-analysis Study on Social Media Fatigue

Xu Ying¹, Yu Yuhe¹, Zhang Huansen^1,2

1. School of Management, Jilin University, Changchun 130022;
2. School of International Economics and Trade, Jilin International Studies University, Changchun 130117

Received:2020-12-23 Revised:2021-02-28 Online:2021-07-05 Published:2021-07-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的/意义] 针对现有社交媒体倦怠影响因素的探究中存在不一致和差异性的问题，使用定量分析方法对已发表的实证研究文献中的统计结果进行梳理总结和再统计。[方法/过程] 本研究从68篇实证研究文献中共提取出72组224个效应值进行研究，将社交媒体倦怠影响因素归纳为情境和本体两大因素，并提炼出平台类型、文化特征、社交媒体使用程度、用户性别及被试群体5个调节变量。使用元分析定量分析方法，通过异质性检验和次群体检验来探讨不同因素对社交媒体倦怠的影响，并检验调节变量对社交媒体倦怠影响的显著性。[结果/结论] 研究结果表明，情境因素和本体因素均对社交媒体倦怠产生显著的正向影响；两者对社交媒体心理倦怠的影响均强于对社交媒体行为倦怠，而情境因素与社交媒体倦怠之间呈现出更高的相关性。同时，本研究归纳识别的5类调节因素在本体因素与社交媒体倦怠之间具有一定的调节效应，而情境因素与社交媒体倦怠之间的关系仅受到被试群体的调节。

关键词: 元分析, 社交媒体倦怠, 社交媒体心理倦怠, 社交媒体行为倦怠, 调节分析

Abstract: [Purpose/significance] To fill the gap and inconsistencies on the influencing factors of social media burnout, this research analyzed and summarized the statistical results in existing empirical research using quantitative analysis.[Method/process] In this study, 72 groups of 224 effect values were extracted from 68 empirical research documents, and the influencing factors of social media fatigue were summarized into two major factors:situation and ontology, and five moderators were extracted, including platform type, cultural characteristics, social media use degree, user gender and test group. Using meta-analysis, this paper discussed the influence of different factors on social media fatigue through heterogeneity test and sub-group test, and tested the significance of moderators.[Result/conclusion] The results show that both situational factors and ontological factors have a significant positive influence on social media fatigue. Both of them have a stronger influence on social media psychological fatigue than on social media behavioral fatigue, and there is a higher correlation between situational factors and social media fatigue. At the same time, the five types of moderating factors identified in this study moderated the relationship between ontological factors and social media fatigue, while the relationship between situational factors and social media fatigue is only regulated by the subjects.

Key words: meta-analysis, social media fatigue, psychological fatigue of social media, social media fatigue behavior, moderator analysis

中图分类号:

G206

徐颖, 于雨禾, 张桓森. 何因生倦怠,何素调节之？——一项关于社交媒体倦怠的元分析研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(13): 31-43.

Xu Ying, Yu Yuhe, Zhang Huansen. What Can Produce Fatigue? What Factors Regulate It?——A Meta-analysis Study on Social Media Fatigue[J]. Library and Information Service, 2021, 65(13): 31-43.

参考文献

[1] 致趣百川.2019社交营销报告[EB/OL].[2020-07-05]. http://www.scrmtech.com.
[2] 李宏, 李微. 社交媒体倦怠研究述评与展望[J].情报科学, 2017(9):172-176.
[3] 张艳丰,刘亚丽,彭丽徽,等.移动社交媒体倦怠行为的影响因素与作用路径研究[J].图书情报工作,2020,64(13):111-119.
[4] 代宝, 罗蕊, 续杨晓雪. 社交媒体倦怠:含义、前因及后果[J]. 现代情报, 2019,39(9):142-150.
[5] 左艳芳, 罗非, 崔彩莲. 冲动与药物依赖[J]. 中国药物依赖性杂志,2007,16(2):81-87.
[6] BRGHT L F,KLEISER S B,GRAU S L. Too much Facebook? An exploratory examination of social media fatigue[J]. Computers in human behavior,2015,44:148-155.
[7] 牛静, 常明芝. 社交媒体使用中的社会交往压力源与不持续使用意向研究[J]. 新闻与传播评论, 2018, 71(6):5-19.
[8] 张艳丰, 李贺, 彭丽徽. 移动社交媒体倦怠行为的影响因素模型及实证研究[J]. 现代情报, 2017(10):38-43.
[9] 杨邦林, 叶一舵, 邱文福. 社交网络中上行社会比较对大学生焦虑的影响:链式中介效应分析[J]. 信阳师范学院学报:哲学社会科学版, 2017,37(4):1-6.
[10] 牛更枫, 孙晓军, 周宗奎,等. 基于QQ空间的社交网站使用对青少年抑郁的影响:上行社会比较和自尊的序列中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(10):1282-1291.
[11] BRGHT L F,LOGAN K. Is my fear of missing out (FOMO) causing fatigue? advertising, social media fatigue, and the implications for consumers and brands[J]. Internet research electronic networking applications & policy, 2018,28(5):1213-1227.
[12] DHIR A,YOSSATORN Y,KAUR P, et al. Online social media fatigue and psychological wellbeing-a study of compulsive use, fear of missing out, fatigue, anxiety and depression[J]. International journal of information management, 2018, 40:141-152.
[13] MALIK A, DHIR A, KAUR P, et al. Correlates of social media fatigue and academic performance decrement:a large cross-sectional study[J]. Information technology & people, 2020,34(2):557-580.
[14] 王建亚, 牛晓蓉, 万莉. 基于元分析的在线学习用户使用行为研究[J]. 现代情报, 2020, 40(1):58-68.
[15] BERNSTEIN E. How Facebook Ruins Friendships.[J]. Wall Street Journal-Eastern Edition, 2009, 254(47):D1-D2.
[16] RAVINDRAN T, KUAN A C Y, LIAN D G H. Antecedents and effects of social network fatigue[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 65(11):2306-2320.
[17] What is social media fatigue? -definition from techopedia[EB/OL].[2020-07-05].https://www.techopedia.com/definition/27372/social-media-fatigue.
[18] CRAMER E M, SONG H, DRENT A M. Social comparison on Facebook:motivation, affective consequences, self-esteem, and Facebook fatigue[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2016, 64:739-746.
[19] 季忠洋, 李北伟, 朱婧祎,等. 情感体验和感知控制双重视角下社交媒体用户倦怠行为机理研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2019, 42(4):133-139.
[20] 张庆芳. 社交媒体惓怠的量表编制[D].厦门:厦门大学,2017.
[21] LEE A R, SON S M, KIM K K. Information and communication technology overload and social networking service fatigue:a stress perspective[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2016, 55:51-61.
[22] 彭丽徽, 李贺, 张艳丰,等. 用户隐私安全对移动社交媒体倦怠行为的影响因素研究——基于隐私计算理论的CAC研究范式[J]. 情报科学, 2018, 36(9):98-104.
[23] ZHANG S, ZHAO L, LU Y, et al. Do you get tired of socializing? an empirical explanation of discontinuous usage behaviour in social network services[J]. Information & management, 2016, 53(7):904-914.
[24] CAO X, SUN J. Exploring the effect of overload on the discontinuous intention of social media users:an S-O-R perspective[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2018, 81:10-18.
[25] 郭蕾, 余波, 李洋,等. 移动社交媒体倦怠行为影响因素研究——基于微信调查[J].图书馆研究, 2019(6):1-14.
[26] 李红云. 新浪微博不持续使用影响因素的实证研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2017.
[27] TADDICKEN M. The ‘Privacy Paradox’ in the social Web:The impact of privacy concerns, individual characteristics, and the perceived social relevance on different forms of self-disclosure[J]. Journal of computer-mediated communication,2014,19(2):248-273.
[28] KARR-WISNIEWSKI P, LU Y. When more is too much:operationalizing technology overload and exploring its impact on knowledge worker productivity[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2010, 26(5):1061-1072.
[29] ZHU Y, BAO Z. The role of negative network externalities in SNS fatigue:an empirical study based on impression management concern, privacy concern, and social overload[J]. Data technologies and applications, 2018,52(3):313-328.
[30] 李旭, 刘鲁川, 张冰倩. 认知负荷视角下社交媒体用户倦怠及消极使用行为研究——以微信为例[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2018, 38(11):94-106.
[31] LEE C C, CHOU T H, HUANG Y R. A study on personality traits and social media fatigue-example of Facebook users[J].Lecture notes on information theory,2014,2(3):249-253.
[32] 林崇德,杨治良,黄希庭,《心理学大辞典》[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2003.
[33] 陈春峰, 张德鹏, 刘思. 用户自我建构对社交媒体疲劳的影响:一个条件过程模型[J]. 情报杂志, 2020,39(04):176-184.
[34] HOCEVAR K P, FLANAGIN A J, METZGER M J. Social media self-efficacy and information evaluation online[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2014, 39:254-262.
[35] ZHU X H, BAO Z S. Why people use social networking sites passively[J]. Aslib journal of information management new information perspectives, 2018,70(2):158-175.
[36] HATO B. Mobile phone checking behavior out of a fear of missing out:development,psychometric properties and test-retest reliability of a C-FoMO-Scale[D].Tilburg:Tilburg University,2013.
[37] 赵启南. 关系性压力下青年使用者社交媒体倦怠影响及其行为结果[J]. 新闻与传播研究, 2019,26(6):59-75.
[38] SAGIOGLOU C, GREITEMEYER T. Facebook's emotional consequences:why Facebook causes a decrease in mood and why people still use it[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2014, 35:359-363.
[39] CHU T H. A meta-analytic review of the relationship between social media use and employee outcomes[J]. Telematics and informatics, 2020:50.
[40] GRANOVETTER M S. The strength of weak ties[J]. American journal of sociology, 1973, 78(6):1360-1380.
[41] 王红. 社交媒体中的自我呈现困境[J]. 传媒, 2019(18):88-90.
[42] 张敏, 孟蝶, 张艳. S-O-R分析框架下的强关系社交媒体用户中辍行为的形成机理——一项基于扎根理论的探索性研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2019, 42(7):80-85,112.
[43] HOFSTEDE G. Focused issue:is management science international?——management scientists are human[J]. Management science, 1994, 40(1):4-13.
[44] LUCAS L M. The role of culture on knowledge transfer:the case of the multinational corporation[J]. Learning organization, 2006,13(3):257-275.
[45] EDWARDS J R, ROTHBARD N P, et al. Mechanisms linking work and family:clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs[J]. Academy of management review, 2000,25(1):178-199.
[46] 刘鲁川, 张冰倩, 李旭. 社交媒体信息过载,功能过载与用户焦虑情绪的关系:一项实验研究[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2019,9(2):66-76.
[47] 戴桢. 基于移动社交电商平台的用户不持续使用行为影响机制及实证研究[D].成都:西南财经大学,2019.
[48] 徐远超, 杨裕萍, 吴大兴. 冲动性在负性情绪与大学生网络过度使用间的中介作用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2013(6):76-79.
[49] 何瑞雪. 基于用户感知的社交媒体倦怠研究[D].成都:四川师范大学,2019.
[50] 张淑玮. 社交网络用户不持续使用行为的实证研究——基于感知过载视角[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2016.
[51] AHUJA M K, THATCHER J B. Moving beyond intentions and toward the theory of trying:effects of work environment and gender on post-adoption information technology use[J]. Mis quarterly, 2005, 29(3):427-459.
[52] 陈越. 网络用户互联网产品使用行为的性别差异研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2015.
[53] EAGLY A H,WOOD W,DIEKMAN A B. Social role theory of sex differences and similarities:a current appraisal[J]. The developmental social psychology of gender,2000:123-174.
[54] 文湘漓, 刘耀中, 倪亚琨,等. 被动性社交网络使用与在线社交焦虑:有调节的中介模型[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2019,27(4):754-757.
[55] TARAFDAR M, QIANG T, RAGU-NATHAN T S, et al. Crossing to the dark side:examining creators, outcomes, and inhibitors of technostress[J]. Communications of the ACM, 2011, 54(9):113-120.
[56] 卢新元, 方文琪, 卢泉,等. 基于元分析的社交媒体用户倦怠行为影响因素研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2020(9):87-92,99.
[57] 崔小雨, 陈春花, 苏涛. 高管团队异质性与组织绩效的关系研究:一项元分析的检验[J]. 管理评论, 2018, 30(9):152-163.
[58] LI J H, CHANG X R, LIN L, et al. Meta-analytic comparison on the influencing factors of knowledge transfer in different cultural contexts[J]. Journal of knowledge management, 2014, 18(2):278-306.
[59] LEE E, LEE K Y, SUNG Y, et al. Delete Facebook:antecedents of Facebook fatigue[J]. Cyberpsychology, behavior, and social networking, 2019, 22(6):417-422.

何因生倦怠,何素调节之？——一项关于社交媒体倦怠的元分析研究

What Can Produce Fatigue? What Factors Regulate It?——A Meta-analysis Study on Social Media Fatigue

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	朱玲玲, 茆意宏. 在线社区用户承诺影响因素研究：一项元分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(3): 106-118.
[2]	卢恒, 张向先, 肖彬, 刘苡声. 在线用户知识付费意愿的影响因素及其调节变量:元分析研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(13): 44-54.
[3]	张艳丰, 刘亚丽, 彭丽徽, 毛太田, 王羽西. 移动社交媒体倦怠行为的影响因素与作用路径研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(13): 111-119.
[4]	张艳丰, 彭丽徽, 洪闯, 刘金承, 高凯. 因果要素关联视域下社交媒体倦怠用户画像模型构建[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(14): 94-100.
[5]	曹树金, 王志红. 虚拟社区知识共享意愿与行为的影响因素及其调节变量:元分析研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(8): 74-83.
[6]	俞立平. 基于学术期刊视角的学科发展水平评价研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(4): 5-11,28.
[7]	张世佳, 曲建升, 王雪梅. 元分析在学科定量集成研究中的应用及进展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(18): 131-137.
[8]	李雪梅, 曲建升. 元分析方法与图书情报学[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013, 57(11): 26-31,64.