被遗忘权对图书馆档案馆信息存档及信息获取的影响

doi:10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.16.004

图书情报工作 ›› 2021, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (16): 35-41.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.16.004

被遗忘权对图书馆档案馆信息存档及信息获取的影响

连志英

中国人民大学信息资源管理学院北京 100872

收稿日期:2021-03-04 修回日期:2021-06-07 出版日期:2021-08-20 发布日期:2021-08-20
作者简介:连志英(ORCID:0000-0001-5356-2304),教授,博士,E-mail:ellen_lian@hotmail.com。
基金资助:
本文系国家社会科学基金项目"我国社群档案记忆建构与传承研究"（项目编号：20BTQ101）研究成果之一。

The Impact of Right to be Forgotten on Information Archiving and Information Access in Libraries and Archives

Lian Zhiying

School of Information Resource Management, Renmin University, Beijing 100872

Received:2021-03-04 Revised:2021-06-07 Online:2021-08-20 Published:2021-08-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的/意义] 了解被遗忘权对图书馆档案馆信息存档与信息获取的影响对于记忆机构开展记忆留存工作，及在记忆留存与提供获取过程中平衡公共利益与个人权利保护，具有重要意义。[方法/过程] 通过案例分析、法律及政策文本分析等方法，对被遗忘权的权利内容及其对图书馆档案馆信息存档与信息获取的影响开展研究，并提出启示和建议。[结果/结论] 被遗忘权的确立和保护并不会阻碍图书馆档案馆信息存档，但可能会导致已存档的某些个人信息不能或被限制提供获取。图书馆档案馆在进行信息存档时，需要遵循数据最少化原则及确保存档信息完整性原则，同时，还需建立和完善全过程审查机制，包括信息提供获取审查机制、信息移除审查机制及移除信息恢复提供获取审查机制，必要时也可对个人信息进行假名化处理，以尽量实现被遗忘权与公共利益之间的平衡。

关键词: 被遗忘权, 信息删除权, 链接删除权, 信息移除政策

Abstract: [Purpose/significance] Learning about the impact of right to be forgotten on information archiving and information access in libraries and archives is significant for memory institutions to conduct memory preservation and to balance the public interests and individual rights in memory preservation and access.[Method/process] The research methods including case study, law and policy text analysis were used to explore the content of right to be forgotten and its impact on information archiving and information access in libraries and archives, and then some suggestions were proposed.[Result/conclusion] Right to be forgotten will not create a hurdle to the information archiving in libraries and archives, but may result in limited access to some information online. Libraries and archives shall abide by such principles as data minimization and guaranteeing information integrity when archiving information. Meanwhile, they need to establish and perfect a series of mechanisms including the review mechanism to decide what information can be accessed online, the review mechanism on the application for taking down online information on the ground of right to be forgotten as well as the review mechanism to recover the access to the takedown information, and if necessary, can pseudonymize some information, thus trying to balance right to be forgotten and the public interest.

Key words: right to be forgotten, right to erasure, right of de-referencing, information take-down policy

中图分类号:

G250

连志英. 被遗忘权对图书馆档案馆信息存档及信息获取的影响[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(16): 35-41.

Lian Zhiying. The Impact of Right to be Forgotten on Information Archiving and Information Access in Libraries and Archives[J]. Library and Information Service, 2021, 65(16): 35-41.

参考文献

[1] IFLA statement on the right to be forgotten[EB/OL].[2021-06-01]. https://www.ifla.org/node/10272.
[2] ICA Congress Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates 19-22 October 2021(rescheduling) Call for proposals and papers[EB/OL].[2021-02-16]. https://www.ica.org/en/call-for-proposals-and-papers-ica-abu-dhabi-congress-closed.
[3] TREIKOV L. European court decision punches holes in free knowledge[EB/OL].[2021-02-16]. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2014/08/06/european-court-decision-punches-holes-in-free-knowledge/.
[4] DE BAETS A. A historian's view on the right to be forgotten[J]. International review of law, computers & technology, 2016,30(1/2):57-66.
[5] HENTTONEN P. Privacy as an archival problem and a solution[J]. Archival science, 2017(17):285-303.
[6] DE ROSNAY M D, GUADAMUZ A. Memory hole or right to delist? Implications of the right to be forgotten for Web archiving[J]. Social science research on the Internet, 2017(6):1-22.
[7] WYBER S. The right to be forgotten and libraries[J]. Journal of information ethics, 2018,27(2):81-97.
[8] 张涛.网络信息存档中被遗忘权适用的冲突与平衡[J].档案学研究,2020(5):126-133.
[9] DRSSLER V, KRISTOF C. The right to be forgotten and implications on digital collections:a survey of ARL member institutions on practice and policy[J].College & research libraries,2018,79(7):972-990.
[10] DE TERWANGNE C. The right to be forgotten and informational autonomy in the digital environment[C]//GHEZZI A, PEREIRA Ã G, VESNIC A L. The ethics of memory in a digital age. Palgrave macmillan memory studies. London:Palgrave Macmillan, 2014:82-101.
[11] ZANFIR G. Tracing the right to be forgotten in the short history of data protection law:the "new clothes" of an old right[C]//GUTWIRTH S, LEENES R, DE HERT P. Reforming European data protection law. Law, governance and technology series. Dordrecht:Springer, 2015(20):227-249.
[12] Judgment of the court (Grand Chamber) 24 September 2019[EB/OL].[2021-02-16]. https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document_print.jsf;jsessionid=FF2068A68B302A60C12B4191B752D64D?docid=218105&text=&dir=&doclang=EN&part=1&occ=first&mode=DOC&pageIndex=0&cid=1704403.
[13] Library of Congress will no longer archive every Tweet[EB/OL].[2021-02-16]. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/12/26/573609499/library-of-congress-will-no-longer-archive-every-tweet.
[14] The Oakland archive policy[EB/OL].[2021-02-16].https://www2.sims.berkeley.edu/research/conferences/aps/removal-policy.html.
[15] Dutch newspaper De Volkskrant can keep negative articles in Internet archive[EB/OL].[2021-02-16].http://www.mediareport.nl/en/persrecht/20042010/dutch-newspaper-de-volkskrant-can-keep-negative-articles-in-internet-archive/#more-4759.
[16] Administrative appeal no.54/2014 between David M Webb and Privacy Commissioner for personal data[EB/OL].[2021-02-16]. https://www.pcpd.org.hk/english/enforcement/decisions/files/AAB_54_2014.pdf.
[17] Wegrzynowski and Smolczewski v. Poland[EB/OL].[2021-02-16].https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/cases/wegrzynowski-smolczewski-v-poland/.
[18] Case C-131/12, Google Spain SL v. Agencia Espanola de Proteccion de Datos[EB/OL].[2021-04-09].http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=152065&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=542615.
[19] KERR J. What is a search engine? the simple question the Court of Justice of the European Union forgot to ask and what it means for the future of the right to be forgotten[J]. Chicago journal of international law, 2016,17(1):219-242.
[20] Records reclosure and takedown policy[EB/OL].[2021-02-16]. https://www.nrscotland.gov.uk/files//record-keeping/records-policies/nrs-records-reclosure-and-takedown-policy-june-2018.pdf.
[21] BERTRAM T, BURSZTEIN E, STEPHANIE C, et al. Five years of the right to be forgotten[C]//Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security. New York:Association for Computing Machinery. 2019:959-972.
[22] Corte Constitucional de Colombia, Sentencia T-277/15[EB/OL].[2021-02-16]. http://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2015/t-277-15.htm.
[23] 高颖,杜娟.大数据时代数据匿名化的法律规制[J/OL]. 情报理论与实践,2021.[2021-02-20]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1762.G3.20210529.1757.002.html.

被遗忘权对图书馆档案馆信息存档及信息获取的影响

The Impact of Right to be Forgotten on Information Archiving and Information Access in Libraries and Archives

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics