[1] 郭碧坚, 韩宇. 同行评议制——方法、理论、功能、指标[J]. 科学学研究, 1994(3):2, 63-73. [2] 胡明铭, 黄菊芳. 同行评议研究综述[J]. 中国科学基金, 2005(4):251-253. [3] 陈秀娟, 张志强. 开放科学的驱动因素、发展优势与障碍[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(6):77-84. [4] 黄国彬, 郑霞. 推进开放科学发展的注册式研究报告及其价值研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(7):73-83. [5] 黄国彬, 郑霞. 开放科学环境下"预注册式研究设计"的产生与影响[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2020, 40(8):103-112. [6] 黄国彬, 郑霞. 注册式研究报告的内容构成剖析[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2020, 10(5):85-95. [7] 黄敏聪. 注册报告制对科技期刊论文发表的变革性影响分析[J]. 编辑学报, 2020, 32(2):232-236. [8] 李潇丽, 潘云涛, 马峥, 等. 注册报告的兴起及其对传统出版模式的挑战[J]. 科技与出版, 2020(10):114-120. [9] CLARKE P, BUCKELL J, BARNETT A. Registered reports:time to radically rethink peer review in health economics[J]. Pharmacoeconomics-open, 2020, 4(1):1-4. [10] MUNAFO M R. Improving the efficiency of grant and journal peer review:registered reports funding[J]. Nicotine & tobacco research, 2017, 19(7):773. [11] CHAMBERS C D, FORSTMANN B, PRUSZYNSKI J A. Registered reports at the European journal of neuroscience:consolidating and extending peer-reviewed study pre-registration[J]. European journal of neuroscience, 2017, 45(5):627-628. [12] JONES C W, ADAMS A, WEAVER M A, et al. Peer reviewed evaluation of registered end-points of randomised trials (the pre-report study):protocol for a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised trial[J]. BMJ open, 2019, 9(5):e028694. [13] 张昊, 朱小玉, 龙军, 等. 开放式同行评议模式的介绍与思考[J]. 世界科技研究与发展, 2011, 33(4):746-748. [14] 刘晶晶. 国外开放获取期刊的同行评议方式研究[J]. 编辑学报, 2017, 29(2):200-203. [15] 索传军, 于淼. 国外期刊论文同行评议创新态势述评[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(1):128-139. [16] 王瑞, 曾广翘. 国外期刊小组同行评议与协作同行评议模式研究[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2021, 32(3):353-359. [17] 贺颖, 付江阳. 透明性同行评议:产生、内涵与建构[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2021, 32(3):332-336. [18] 钟茜韵. 语言学视角下的同行评议研究[J]. 海外英语, 2019, 403(15):252-253. [19] 撒旭, 王健, 范智萱, 等. 数据期刊同行评议视角下科学数据质量评价指标识别[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(17):123-130. [20] 苏金燕. 政策视角下同行评议研究现状与问题[J]. 现代情报, 2020, 40(9):127-132. [21] 秦成磊, 章成志. 大数据环境下同行评议面临的问题与对策[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(4):99-112. [22] FERGUSON C, MARCUS A, ORANSKY I. The peer-review scam[J]. Nature, 2014, 515(7528):480-482. [23] BOHANNON J. Who's afraid of peer review?[J]. Science, 2013, 342(6154):60-65. [24] LEE J H, JEON J H, PARK K S, et al. The necessities for the transparent peer-review[J]. Iranian journal of public health, 2021, 50(4):831-832. [25] MOUTINHO S. Journals to outsource peer review[J]. Science, 2021, 372(6541):441. [26] SANTOS A, MORRIS D S, RATTAN R, et al. Double-blinded manuscript review:avoiding peer review bias[J]. The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2021, 91(1):E39-E42. [27] PARSONS C E, BAGLINI R B. Peer review:the case for neutral language.[J]. Trends in cognitive sciences, 2021, 25(8):639-641. [28] XIONG Y, SCHUNN C D. Reviewer, essay, and reviewing-process characteristics that predict errors in web-based peer review[J]. Computers & education, 2021, 166:104146. [29] CHECCHI D, CIOLFI A, DE FRAJA G, et al. Have you read this? an empirical comparison of the British REF peer review and the Italian VQR bibliometric algorithm[M]//CATALANO G, DARAIO C, GREGORI M, et al. 17th international conference on scientometrics & informetrics. Leuven:Int Soc Scientometrics & Informetrics-Issi, 2019:1847-1858. [30] ABRAMO G, D'ANGELO C A. Evaluating research:from informed peer review to bibliometrics[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 87(3):499-514. [31] Registered reports[EB/OL]. [2021-03-01]. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/registered-reports. [32] OSF|Registeredreportsguidelines_generic_v2.docx[EB/OL]. [2021-03-01]. https://osf.io/pukzy/. [33] Cortex-journal-elsevier[EB/OL]. [2021-03-01]. https://www.journals.elsevier.com/cortex. [34] Wellcome open research|Open Access Publishing Platform|Beyond a research journal[EB/OL]. [2021-03-01]. https://wellcomeopenresearch.org/. [35] Animal behavior and cognition[EB/OL]. [2021-03-01]. http://animalbehaviorandcognition.org/. [36] Applied cognitive psychology-wiley online library[EB/OL]. [2021-03-01]. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10990720. [37] International journal of eating disorders-wiley online library[EB/OL]. [2021-03-01]. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/1098108x. [38] PLOS biology:a peer-reviewed open-access journal[EB/OL]. [2021-03-01]. https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/. [39] Journal of child language|cambridge core[EB/OL]. [2021-03-01]. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-child-language. [40] Journal of european psychology students[EB/OL]. [2021-03-01]. https://jeps.efpsa.org/about/editorialpolicies/. [41] Registered reports[EB/OL]. [2021-03-02]. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/registered-reports. [42] Submission guidelines-animal behavior and cognition[EB/OL]. [2021-03-02]. http://animalbehaviorandcognition.org/submissions.php. [43] Finding article reviewers|wellcome open research[EB/OL]. [2021-03-02]. https://wellcomeopenresearch.org/for-authors/tips-for-finding-referees#prp. [44] PLOS biology:a peer-reviewed open-access journal[EB/OL]. [2021-03-02]. https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/reviewer-guidelines. [45] Submission guidelines-animal behavior and cognition[EB/OL]. [2021-03-02]. http://animalbehaviorandcognition.org/submissions.php. [46] GSPR-Publons[EB/OL]. [2021-03-02]. https://publons.com/community/gspr. [47] Guide for authors-cortex[EB/OL]. [2021-03-03]. https://www.elsevier.com/journals/cortex/0010-9452/guide-for-authors. [48] PLOS biology:a peer-reviewed open-access journal[EB/OL]. [2021-03-03]. https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/reviewer-guidelines. [49] Journal of child language.peer reviewer guidelines[EB/OL]. [2021-03-04]. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-child-language/information/peer-reviewer-guidelines. [50] Ethics in peer review[EB/OL]. [2021-03-04]. https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/peer-review/ethics-in-peer-review. [51] Best practice guidelines on publishing ethics|wiley[EB/OL]. [2021-03-04]. https://authorservices.wiley.com/ethics-guidelines/index.html.作者贡献说明:黄国彬:确定论文的选题与研究思路, 论文的修改与指导; 刘磊:素材收集与整理, 论文主要撰写人; 陈丽:协助论文的撰写和修改。 |