从合作馆藏到集体馆藏的探索:法明顿计划80年后的审思

doi:10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.20.004

图书情报工作 ›› 2021, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (20): 31-41.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.20.004

从合作馆藏到集体馆藏的探索:法明顿计划80年后的审思

张康, 李卓卓, 苗淼儿

苏州大学社会学院, 苏州 215123

收稿日期:2021-04-08 修回日期:2021-06-10 出版日期:2021-10-20 发布日期:2021-10-22
通讯作者: 李卓卓(ORCID:0000-0002-3022-5652),副教授,博士,通讯作者,E-mail:smileforver96@126.com
作者简介:张康(ORCID:0002-0002-0461-1218),硕士研究生;苗淼儿(ORCID:0000-0002-4322-4237),硕士研究生。
基金资助:
本文系2019年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"基于多源数据的区域文献联合处置研究"（项目编号：19YJC870013）研究成果之一。

Research from Cooperative Collection to Collective Collection: Reflections After 80 Years of Farmington Plan

Zhang Kang, Li Zhuozhuo

Soochow University, Suzhou 215123

Received:2021-04-08 Revised:2021-06-10 Online:2021-10-20 Published:2021-10-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的/意义] 回顾法明顿计划后图书馆信息资源共享探索历程，分析合作馆藏、集体馆藏的深层价值意义，为新时期我国图书馆信息资源建设的研究和实践确定锚点。[方法/过程] 回顾20世纪40年代以来图书馆信息资源共享进程中的两次"里程碑"——合作馆藏、集体馆藏，揭示其背后的价值意义，并分析这些价值意义如何推动合作馆藏转向集体馆藏。[结果/结论] 研究发现，法明顿计划从目标指向、内涵设置及实现途径3个方面为早期合作馆藏发展奠定了基础；20世纪70年代和90年代，对合作馆藏的探索先后经历了对"高度利它性"和"协作式合作馆藏"的反思，完成了"尊重成员利益"和"互补式合作馆藏"的转向，并于21世纪初在数据驱动、凸显合作效益的意义设计中重构，转向系统意识下的集体馆藏。这些价值意义对我国图书馆信息资源共享实践具有启迪作用：强化图书馆信息资源建设的战略支撑作用，追求越精准越协同的共赢理念，凸显数据赋能的效能导向。

关键词: 法明顿计划, 合作馆藏, 集体馆藏, 信息资源共享, 信息资源建设

Abstract: [Purpose/significance] This paper reviews the exploration process of library information resources sharing t after Farmington Plan, analyzes the deep value significance of cooperative collection and collective collection, and determines the anchor point for the research and practice of library information resources development in China in the new era. [Method/process] The study reviewed the two "milestones" in the process of library information sharing since the 1940s:cooperative collection and collective collection, revealed the value significance behind them, and analyzed how these value promote cooperative collection to collective collection. [Result/conclusion] The study found that, the Farmington Plan laid the foundation for the development of early cooperative collection from three aspects:goal orientation, connotation setting and realization approach; in the 1970s and 1990s, the exploration of cooperative collection experienced the reflection of "highly altruistic" and "synergism cooperative collection", and completed the transformation of "respecting members' interests" and "complementary cooperative collection". At the beginning of the 21st century, under the goal guidance of data-driven and highlighting the benefits of cooperation, the cooperative collection turned to the collective collection. These values have enlightening effects on the practice of library information development in China:strengthening the strategic support role of library information resources construction, pursuing the win-win concept of more accurate and more collaborative, and highlighting the efficiency orientation of data empowerment.

Key words: Farmington Plan, cooperative collection, collective collection, information sharing, information development

中图分类号:

G250

张康, 李卓卓, 苗淼儿. 从合作馆藏到集体馆藏的探索:法明顿计划80年后的审思[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(20): 31-41.

Zhang Kang, Li Zhuozhuo. Research from Cooperative Collection to Collective Collection: Reflections After 80 Years of Farmington Plan[J]. Library and Information Service, 2021, 65(20): 31-41.

参考文献

[1] DEMPSEY L,MALPAS C,LAVIOE B.Collection directions:the evolution of library collections and collecting[J].Portal:libraries and the academy,2014,14(3):393-423.
[2] NANCY E. OCLC research:past, present and future[J]. Journal of library administration,2009,49(7):5-11.
[3] CLEMENT S,SUSANNE K.From collaborative purchasing towards collaborative discarding:the evolution of the shared print repository[J].Collection management,2012,37(3/4):153-167.
[4] DEMPSEY L.Library collections in the life of the user:two firections[J].Liber quarterly,2016,26(4):332-338.
[5] VOSPER R. Farmingtion redivivus:the years of co-ordinated foreign book procurement in the U.S.[J].Library journal,1959,11(2):327-334.
[6] GIBB I P. Foreign book procuremen:the decennial Farmington Plan survey and afterwards[J]. Journal of documentation,1960,16(1):1-9.
[7] 王劲松,梁丽.中美信息资源共建共享政府行为比较研究[J].新世纪图书馆,2009,37(1):26-28.
[8] EDELMAN H H. The death of the Farmington Plan[J]. Library journal, 1973,17(5):25-32.
[9] SHELTON C Y. Best practices in cooperative collection development[J]. Collection management,2008,28(3):191-222.
[10] SOHN J. Cooperative collection development[J].Collection management, 1986,8(2):1-10.
[11] 郭晓红.基于分布式合作储存的印本馆藏共享机制研究——以美国缅因州共享印本馆藏项目实践为例[J].图书馆理论与实践,2017(2):49-53.
[12] 郭晓红.图书馆转型下的学术印本资源分布式区域合作储存研究——以美国西部学术资源区域合作储存实践为例[J].情报资料工作,2017(4):68-74.
[13] DANNELLY G Y. The center for research libraries and cooperative collection development[J].Collection management,1998,23(4):37-45.
[14] MALLERY M, THEU S. New frontiers in collaborative collection management[J]. Technical services quarterly,2012,29(2):101-112.
[15] BOSCH S, LYONS L. Measuring success of cooperative collection development[J]. Collection management,2004,28(3):223-239.
[16] KIEFT R H, PAYNE L. Collective collection, collective action[J]. Collection management, 2012,37(3):137-152.
[17] DEMAS S, Miller E M. Rethinking collection management plans:hoping collective collections for the 21st century[J]. Collection management, 2012,37:(3):168-187.
[18] GARSKOF J, MORRIS J. Towards the collective collection:lessons learned from PALCI's DDA pilot projects and next steps[J]. Collaborative librarianship, 2016, 8(2):3-7.
[19] HRLWN N L.Michigan shared print initiative and Green Glass for groups for data analysis in developing a collaborative collective collection[J] Document delivery & electronic reserve, 2014,25(3):89-105.
[20] BAKKER T. Resource sharing in Dutch academic libraries[J]. Resource sharing & information networks,1998,13(2):15-27.
[21] 王红霞.学术图书馆联盟集体馆藏建设研究——以十大学术联盟为例[J].图书馆学研究,2020(15):71-77.
[22] 许炜,李卓卓."双一流"背景下数据驱动的高校图书馆集体馆藏与精准合作研究[J].图书馆学研究,2020(21):23-31.
[23] MIRSKY L. From Farmington Plan to the Pacific Rim Digital Library Alliance[J] Collection management,1999,24(13):241-250.
[24] 周晓英,崔佳佳,唐宇萍,等.情报学的起源与方向——从布什的《诚如所思》谈起[J].情报科学,2004(2):129-132.
[25] WOLFGANG M. Cooperative collection development and resource sharing among art libraries:past and present[J].Art libraries journal,1986(11):19-32.
[26] 上海地区文献资源共享协作网华东师范大学信息学系联合课题组.美国图书馆信息资源共享的历史与现状[J].图书馆杂志,1999(10):19-22.
[27] TERENCE K. Collaborative collection development comes of age[J].Computers in libraries,2015,35(3):25-27.
[28] DEMPSEY D. A history of the Farmington Plan[J].Libraries & Culture,2004(4):473-475.
[29] KENNETH S. Warren the evolution of selective biomedical libraries and their use in the developing world[J].The journal of the American Medical Association,1987,257(19):67-71.
[30] 龙旭梅,王先林.美国合作藏书建设的发展综述[J].中华医学图书馆杂志,2000,36(5):17-21.
[31] 肖希明.藏书发展模式的选择:拥有还是存取?[J].图书馆论坛,2002,22(1):56-59.
[32] DEMPSEY L. The emergence of the collective collection:analyzing aggregate print library holdings[M].Dublin, OH:OCLC Research,2013:8.
[33] LAVOIE B,DEMPSEY L,MALPAS C. Reflections on collective collections[J].College & research libraries,2020,81(6):112-131.
[34] DEMPSEY L,MALPAS C,SANDLER M. Operationalizing the BIG collective collection:a case study of consolidation vs autonomy[EB/OL].[2021-01-13].https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom/119.
[35] MALPAS C,LAVOIE B. Strength in numbers:the research libraries UK(RLUK)collective collection[EB/OL].[2020-05-28].http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/2016/oclcresearch-strength-in-numbers-rluk-collective-collection-2016-a4.pdf.
[36] OCLC.FAST(Faceted application of subject terminology)[EB/OL].[2021-01-13].https://www.oclc.org/research/areas/data-science/fast.html.
[37] 刘兹恒.图书馆文献资源建设的过去和未来[N].新华书目报,2020-12-25(025).
[38] KIEFT B A. College library, its print monograph collection and the new information ecology[J].Against the grain,2014,22(5):7-10.
[39] 叶继元.聚焦学科核心领域,重构文献信息资源保障体系[J].图书与情报,2020(5):1-8.
[40] 郭晶.赋能存量,做优增量,把握变量——面向"十四五"的国内高校图书馆文献信息资源建设思考[J].图书情报工作, 2021,65(1):47-54.
[41] 曾建勋.开放融合环境下NSTL资源建设的发展思考[J].大学图书馆学报,2020,38(6):63-70.
[42] DING J,YU S,WANG H,et al. Member structure and sharing behavior:social network analysis of CALIS online cataloging data in China[J]. The journal of academic librarianship,2020,46(2):102-115.
[43] 裴成发,温芳芳. 国外图书馆联盟信息资源建设制度研究进展(2005-2014)[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(15):122-132.
[44] LAVOIE B. The US and Canadian collective print book collection:A 2019 snapshot[EB/OL].[2021-04-07].https://www.oclc.org/research/publications/2019/oclcresearch-us-and-canadian-collective-print-book-collection-2019.html.

从合作馆藏到集体馆藏的探索:法明顿计划80年后的审思

Research from Cooperative Collection to Collective Collection: Reflections After 80 Years of Farmington Plan

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	宋姬芳. 以信息资源建设助推大学图书馆"十四五"知识服务能力提升——以中国人民大学图书馆为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(5): 63-71.
[2]	徐青梅, 陶蕊, 叶继元. 数字资源与电子资源:概念辨析及术语规范探讨[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(18): 3-14.
[3]	林芳, 孙巍, 张学福. 勤思善学笃行致远——孟连生在图书情报领域的实践研究及学术影响[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(15): 36-43.
[4]	郭晶. 赋能存量做优增量把握变量——面向“十四五”的国内高校图书馆文献信息资源建设思考[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(1): 47-54.
[5]	肖希明, 石庆功, 刘奕. 信息资源建设:“十三五”回望与“十四五”前瞻[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(1): 55-63.
[6]	石宇, 胡昌平. 云计算环境下学术信息资源共享全面安全保障机制[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(3): 54-59.
[7]	吴高, 林芳, 韦楠华. 公共数字文化服务绩效评价现状、问题及对策分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(2): 60-67.
[8]	杨建梁, 刘越男. 基于DEMATEL模型的我国政府信息资源跨部门共享的关键影响因素研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(19): 64-76.
[9]	李卓卓, 韩静娴, 王芳. 共享经济视角下的图书馆信息资源共享模式的优化[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(17): 20-26.
[10]	裴成发, 温芳芳. 国外图书馆联盟信息资源建设制度研究进展(2005-2014)[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015, 59(15): 122-132.
[11]	王丽华, 赵清亮. 文化信息资源共享:内涵与视域的拓展——基于雷蒙·威廉斯的文化观[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(23): 41-46.
[12]	李卓卓, 沈妍. 云仓储环境下图书馆联盟数字资源长期保存合作模式研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013, 57(14): 45-49,113.
[13]	白新勤. 图书馆实施读者决策采购(PDA)的基本路径探讨[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013, 57(05): 76-80.
[14]	丘秀文. 面向弱势专业群的文献信息资源建设策略——以海南经贸职业技术学院为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2012, (19): 56-59.
[15]	赖茂生樊振佳. 政治利益对政府信息资源共享的影响分析：基于理性选择制度主义的视角[J]. 图书情报工作, 2012, 56(07): 112-116.