图书情报工作 ›› 2021, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (21): 108-117.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.21.018

• 情报研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

中文人文社会科学学术图书的影响力评价——以图书馆情报与文献学为例

彭秋茹1,2, 何贝1,2, 黄水清1,2   

  1. 1. 南京农业大学信息管理学院 南京 210095;
    2. 南京农业大学人文与社会计算研究中心 南京 210095
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-02 修回日期:2021-08-05 出版日期:2021-11-05 发布日期:2021-11-19
  • 通讯作者: 黄水清(ORCID:0000-0002-1646-9300),教授,博士,博士生导师,通讯作者,E-mail:sqhuang@njau.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:彭秋茹(ORCID:0000-0002-8750-9648),助理研究员,博士,师资博士后;何贝(ORCID:0000-0001-7247-9311),本科生。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家社会科学基金青年项目"中文人文社会科学学术图书全文本引文分析模式研究"(项目编号:20CTQ026)和南京农业大学中央高校基本科研业务费人文社会科学研究基金项目"人文社科中文学术图书全文本引文分析研究"(项目编号:SKYZ2021023)研究成果之一。

Impact Evaluation of Chinese Academic Books on Humanities and Social Sciences: Taking Library & Information Science as an Example

Peng Qiuru1,2, He Bei1,2, Huang Shuiqing1,2   

  1. 1. College of Information Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095;
    2. Research Center for Humanities and Social Computing, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095
  • Received:2021-07-02 Revised:2021-08-05 Online:2021-11-05 Published:2021-11-19

摘要: [目的/意义] 学术图书是呈现科学研究活动成果的重要工具,也是人类社会信息活动中的重要信息资源,对学术图书进行影响力评价有利于学术图书得到充分的利用。[方法/过程] 在吸取前人研究成果的基础上设计一套完整、全面的中文人文社会科学学术图书影响力评价体系,从图书的学术影响力和社会影响力两方面出发,设置多级评价指标,并选取CBKCI中图书馆情报与文献学领域的103本学术图书作为研究样本,收集相应的指标数据,采用CRITIC赋权法、TOPSIS法对103个样本图书进行影响力评价实证。[结果/结论] 研究结果表明,本文提出的中文人文社会科学学术图书影响力评价指标和方法,考虑了科研学者、读者、图书本身等因素,较全面地反映出学术图书影响力的各个方面,具有一定的易用性和可行性。

关键词: 中文学术图书, 影响力评价, 图书评价, 人文社会科学, 图书情报

Abstract: [Purpose/significance] Academic books are not only an important tool to present the results of scientific research activities, but also an important information resource in human social information activities. The impact evaluation of academic books is conductive to the full use of them.[Method/process] On the basis of previous research results, this paper designed a complete and comprehensive impact evaluation system of Chinese academic books on Humanities and Social Sciences, and set up multi-level evaluation indicators from the academic impact and social impact. And this paper selected 103 academic books in the field of Library & Information Science from CBKCI as research samples, collected the corresponding indicator data, and used CRITIC and TOPSIS to evaluate the impact of 103 sample books.[Result/conclusion] The research results show that indicators and methods of the impact evaluation of Chinese academic books on Humanities and Social Sciences proposed in this paper consider the factors of scientific research scholars, readers and books themselves, they comprehensively reflect all aspects of the impact of academic books, and there are a certain ease of use and feasibility.

Key words: Chinese academic books, impact evaluation, book evaluation, Humanities and Social Sciences, Library and Information Science

中图分类号: