图书情报工作 ›› 2022, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (5): 13-23.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.05.002

所属专题: 网络信息内容生态安全风险治理

• 专题:网络信息内容生态安全风险治理 • 上一篇    下一篇

网络信息内容安全风险:特征、演变及场景要素解构

王建亚1, 马榕培1, 周毅2   

  1. 1. 天津财经大学管理科学与工程学院 天津 300222;
    2. 苏州大学社会学院 苏州 215123
  • 收稿日期:2021-06-06 修回日期:2021-10-30 出版日期:2022-03-05 发布日期:2022-03-21
  • 通讯作者: 周毅,教授,博士生导师,通信作者,E-mail:zhouy@suda.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:王建亚,副教授,博士,硕士生导师;马榕培,硕士研究生。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家社会科学基金一般项目“网络信息内容生态安全风险治理模式构建与实现研究”(项目编号:21BTQ013)研究成果之一。

Characteristics, Evolution and Deconstruction of Scene Elements on Security Risks of Network Information Contents

Wang Jianya1, Ma Rongpei1, Zhou Yi2   

  1. 1. School of Management Science and Engineering, Tianjin University of Finance and Economics, Tianjin 300222;
    2. School of Sociology, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123
  • Received:2021-06-06 Revised:2021-10-30 Online:2022-03-05 Published:2022-03-21

摘要: [目的/意义] 网络信息内容治理已成为国家战略的重要部分,是建设网络强国的重要举措。进行网络信息内容安全风险识别和解构,是诊断网络信息内容治理重点和难点的有效途径。[方法/过程] 通过文献调研分析,结合《网络信息内容生态治理规定》,对网络信息内容安全风险进行研判和特征分析;使用内容分析法,对中华人民共和国国家互联网信息办公室7年以来处理发布的网络信息内容治理事件进行量化分析;使用社会网络分析法,分析网络信息内容安全风险相关要素在治理中的相互关系,对其场景要素进行解构。[结果/结论] 将网络信息内容安全风险分为9类,并分析每种风险的内涵和表现;风险的发展演化趋势及变化与网络新媒体技术的发展、突发性公共安全事件和网络治理相关政策法规的变化有关;不同类型风险的场景要素存在差异,信息服务平台参与度明显较低,网络意识形态风险、文化入侵风险的关注度较低。在治理对象方面提出需要细化网络信息内容安全风险特征,特别是要建立网络信息内容安全风险评估体系,在治理主体方面重点是明确信息服务平台的主体责任,在治理根本原则方面,需要聚焦国家总体安全观下的网络信息内容治理。

关键词: 网络信息内容安全风险, 网络信息内容治理, 信息安全, 网络空间

Abstract: [Purpose/significance] Network information content governance has become an important part of national strategy and an important measure to build a cyber power. Identifying and deconstructing the risks of network information content security is an effective way to diagnose the key and difficult points of network information content governance. [Method/process] Combining literature investigation with the Regulations on Ecological Governance of Network Information Contents, this paper conducted research and carried out feature analysis of network information content security risks; With content analysis method, this paper made a quantitative analysis of the network information content governance incidents published by Cyberspace Administration of China in the past seven years; With social network analysis method, this paper analyzed the relationship between the elements related to the risks of network information content security in governance, and deconstructed scene elements. [Result/conclusion] This paper divides the risks of network information content security into 9 types, and analyzes the connotations and characterizations of each risk. The evolution trend of the risk is related to the development of network new media technology, unexpected public safety incidents and the changes of policies and regulations related to network governance. There are differences among the scene elements of different types of risk, such as the significantly low participation of information service platforms, and little attention to the network ideology risk or the cultural invasion risk. In terms of governance objects, this paper proposes that it is necessary to further subdivide the characteristics of network information content security risks, especially in establishing the risk assessment system of network information content security. In terms of governance subjects, the key point is clarifying the main responsibility of network information service platforms. In terms of fundamental governance principles, we need to focus on the network information content governance in the view of a holistic approach to national security.

Key words: security risks of network information contents, network information content governance, information security, cyberspace

中图分类号: