学习材料知识表示形式对数字阅读效果的影响研究

doi:10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.08.002

图书情报工作 ›› 2022, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (8): 13-20.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.08.002

所属专题：赋能信息用户,提升学习效果

• 专题：赋能信息用户，提升学习效果 • 上一篇下一篇

学习材料知识表示形式对数字阅读效果的影响研究

梁昌豪¹, 张鹏翼²

1. 日本京都大学, 京都 606-8501,;
2. 北京大学信息管理系, 北京 100871

收稿日期:2021-07-06 修回日期:2021-12-02 出版日期:2022-04-30 发布日期:2022-04-24
通讯作者: 张鹏翼,长聘副教授,博士,博士生导师,通信作者,E-mail:pengyi@pku.edu.cn。
作者简介:梁昌豪,博士研究生。
基金资助:
本研究系国家自然科学基金面上项目"在线知识社群中信息行为对群体认知形成的影响研究"(项目编号:72174014)研究成果之一。

Research on the Effect of Knowledge Representation Forms of Learning Materials on Digital Reading

Liang Changhao¹, Zhang Pengyi²

1. Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501;
2. Department of Information Management, Peking University, Beijing 100871

Received:2021-07-06 Revised:2021-12-02 Online:2022-04-30 Published:2022-04-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的/意义]从知识组织的角度,探究两种不同组织形式对学习材料阅读效果的影响,对后续阅读材料知识表示的研究和应用提供借鉴。[方法/过程]研究使用组间设计,26个用户分别参加阅读搜索任务和记忆任务的两类阅读测验,通过阅读时间、测验正确题数以及用户的主观偏好来比较二者差异。[结果/结论]实验结果表明,用户在阅读搜索任务中的绩效未表现出显著差异,但在记忆任务中,树状组织形式的阅读效果显著优于传统的线性文段的阅读效果。此外,用户主观偏好评价中树状材料的优点更多,具有逻辑清晰,便于记忆等特点。

关键词: 学习材料, 知识表示, 数字阅读, 阅读效果

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] From the perspective of knowledge organization, this study explores the influence of two different organization forms on the reading effect of learning materials, and provides references for the research and application of knowledge representation in subsequent reading materials. [Method/Process] Using a between-group experiment design, 26 subjects participated two types of reading tests, a reading search task and a memory task, respectively. The differences were compared by reading time, the number of correct questions and subjective preference of subjects. [Result/Conclusion] The results show that there is no significant difference in the performance of the subjects in the search task, but in the memory task, the reading effect of tree-structure organization form is significantly better than traditional linear paragraphs. In addition, the merits of the tree-structured materials in the evaluation of subjects’ subjective preferences are more, such as clear logic, easy to remember, and so on.

Key words: learning materials, knowledge representation, digital reading, reading effect

中图分类号:

G252.0

梁昌豪, 张鹏翼. 学习材料知识表示形式对数字阅读效果的影响研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(8): 13-20.

Liang Changhao, Zhang Pengyi. Research on the Effect of Knowledge Representation Forms of Learning Materials on Digital Reading[J]. Library and Information Service, 2022, 66(8): 13-20.

参考文献

[1] BLOM H, SEGERS E, KNOORS H, et al. Comprehension and navigation of networked hypertexts[J]. Journal of computer assisted learning, 2018, 34(3):306-314.
[2] STUDER R, BENJAMINS V R, FENSEL D. Knowledge engineering:principles and methods[J]. Data&knowledge engineering, 1998, 25(1/2):161-197.
[3] FIKES R. The role of frame-based representation in reasoning[J]. Cacm, 1985, 28(9):904-920.
[4] O'DONNELL A M, DANSEREAU D F, HALL R H. Knowledge maps as scaffolds for cognitive processing[J]. Educational psychology review, 2002, 14(1):71-86.
[5] 吕胤宣.电子书版式设计对受众阅读心理影响的研究[D].沈阳:沈阳师范大学, 2014.
[6] BERNARD M L, CHAPARRO B S, MILLS M M, et al. Comparing the effects of text size and format on the readability of computer-displayed times new roman and arial text[J]. International journal of human-computer studies, 2003, 59(6):823-835.
[7] 宫殿坤,郝春东,王殿春.字体特征与搜索方式对视觉搜索反应时的影响[J].心理科学, 2009(5):1142-1145.
[8] 朱海. VDT文本阅读工效及其影响因素[J].人类工效学, 1996(2):53-56.
[9] KOLERS P A, DUCHNICKY R L, FERGUSON D C. Eye movement measurement of readability of CRT displays[J]. Human factors the journal of the human factors&ergonomics society, 1981, 23(5):517-527.
[10] HWANG S L, WANG M Y, HER C C. An experimental study of Chinese information displays on VDTs[J]. Human factors, 1988, 30(4):461-471.
[11] TULLIS T S. The formatting of numeric displays:a review and analysis[J]. Human factors, 1983, 25(6):657-682.
[12] SUTHERS D D. Effects of alternate representations of evidential relations on collaborative learning discourse[C]//Proceedings of the computer support for collaborative learning 1999 Conference. Palo Alto, CA:International Society of the Learning Sciences, 1999:611-621.
[13] SUTHERS D D. Towards a systematic study of representational guidance for collaborative learning discourse[J]. Journal of universal computer science, 2001, 7(7):254-277.
[14] KOMISCHKE T. Text treatment and the user interface[EB/OL].[2021-12-01].https://www.uxmatters.com/mt/archives/2009/01/text-treatment-and-the-user-interface.php.
[15] KRUG S.点石成金:访客至上的Web和移动可用性设计秘笈[M].蒋芳,译.北京:机械工业出版社, 2015.
[16] 杜建华.电子书信息组织模式研究[D].北京:北京印刷学院, 2014.
[17] CHAKRABARTI S. Mining the Web:discovering knowledge from hypertext data[M]. San Francisco:Morgan Kaufmann, 2002.
[18] KHALIFA M, LAM R. Web-based learning:effects on learning process and outcome[J]. IEEE transactions on education, 2002, 45(4):350-356.
[19] KLOIS S S, SEGERS E, VERHOEVEN L. How hypertext fosters children's knowledge acquisition:the roles of text structure and graphical overview[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2013, 29(5):2047-2057.
[20] 张智君,江程铭,任衍具,等.信息呈现方式、时间压力和认知风格对网上学习的影响[J].浙江大学学报(理学版),2004(2):228-231.
[21] NIEDERHAUSER D S, REYNOLDS R E, SALMEN D J, et al. The influence of cognitive load on learning from hypertext[J]. Journal of educational computing research, 2000, 23(3):237-255.
[22] 张智君.超文本阅读中的迷路问题及其心理学研究[J].心理科学进展, 2001, 9(2):102-106.
[23] 张智君,沈昉,朱伟,等.文本组织和结构化水平对中文信息搜索的影响[J].心理科学, 2005, 28(2):368-370.
[24] DESTEFANO D, LEFEVRE J A. Cognitive load in hypertext reading:a review[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2007, 23(3):1616-1641.
[25] 谢继红,刘华山,吴鹏.超文本与线性文本中元理解判断的比较[J].心理学探新, 2018, 38(1):49-54.
[26] WALHOUT J, BRAND-GRUWEL S, JARODZKA H, et al. Learning and navigating in hypertext:navigational support by hierarchical menu or tag cloud?[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2015, 46(2015):218-227.
[27] MANGEN A, OLIVIER G, VELAY J-L. Comparing comprehension of a long text read in print book and on Kindle:where in the text and when in the story?[J/OL]. Frontiers in psychology, 2019, 10(38):1-11.[2021-11-21]. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02014788/document.
[28] COIRO J. Toward a multifaceted heuristic of digital reading to inform assessment, research, practice, and policy[J]. Reading research quarterly, 2021, 56(1):9-31.
[29] 张智君,韩淼,朱祖祥,等.文本结构和时间应激对网页阅读绩效的影响[J].心理科学, 2002, 25(4):422-424.
[30] 孙悦亮,肖崇好.限定阅读时间条件下文本呈现方式对阅读效果的影响[J].心理与行为研究, 2006(4):297-300.
[31] SABATINI J, WANG Z, O'REILLY T. Relating reading comprehension to oral reading performance in the NAEP fourth-grade special study of oral reading[J]. Reading research quarterly, 2019, 54(2):253-271.
[32] 陈康. PISA阅读素养测评内容领域的解析及其启示[J].中国考试, 2014(10):56-60.
[33] MCDONALD S, STEVENSON R J. Disorientation in hypertext:the effects of three text structures on navigation performance[J]. Applied ergonomics, 1996, 27(1):61-68.
[34] AMADIEU F, TRICOT A, MARINE C. Interaction between prior knowledge and concept-map structure on hypertext comprehension, coherence of reading orders and disorientation[J]. Interacting with computers, 2010, 22(2):88-97.
[35] CHANG K E, SUNG Y T, CHIOU S K. Use of hierarchical hyper concept map in Web-based courses[J]. Journal of educational computing research, 2002, 27(4):335-353.

学习材料知识表示形式对数字阅读效果的影响研究

Research on the Effect of Knowledge Representation Forms of Learning Materials on Digital Reading

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	谢娟, 李雪, 李红, 张小雨, 秦霞. 数字乡村战略下基层阅读服务协同治理现状与对策——以湖北省7县(市)130村为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(3): 26-35.
[2]	梁少博, 李金玲. 移动数字阅读平台用户转移行为研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(2): 99-108.
[3]	韩牧哲, 高劲松, 李钰. 面向考古类型学的出土陶器器形的知识表示与语义关联构建[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(12): 92-107.
[4]	李洪晨, 马捷, 高鹤萌, 郝志远. 面向发展性阅读障碍的数字阅读与纸质阅读比较研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(11): 66-75.
[5]	韩燕, 茆意宏. 2017年以来信息技术环境下阅读服务国外研究现状[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(4): 144-152.
[6]	马坤坤, 茆意宏, Xiangmin Zhang, Hermina Anghelescu, 朱玲玲. 深度数字阅读推广的内容营销机制研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(8): 32-40.
[7]	茆意宏. 全民防控疫情期间在线阅读服务观察与思考[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(15): 131-137.
[8]	茆意宏, 朱玲玲, 韩燕. 智慧阅读服务概念界定及国内相关研究评析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(1): 131-138.
[9]	方浩, 尚媛媛, 张锐, 庞惠珊, 袁医灵. 数据新闻中信息图表的阅读效果:来自眼动的证据[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(8): 74-86.
[10]	常昕. 国内读书会运行机制与活动模式探析——基于全国135家读书会的问卷调查与深度访谈[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(20): 82-87.
[11]	彭爱东, 邢思思, 茆意宏. 图书馆数字阅读推广的发展现状与对策[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(17): 93-102.
[12]	牛丽慧, 欧石燕. 纳米出版及其应用研究进展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(7): 125-133.
[13]	严玲艳, 胡泊. 美国公共图书馆儿童数字阅读推广实践调查及启示[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(4): 137-144.
[14]	秦春秀, 杨智娟, 赵捧未, 刘杰. 面向科技文献知识表示的知识元本体模型[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(3): 94-103.
[15]	李琳娜, 马捷, 潘逸尘. 国外数字阅读与纸质阅读的比较研究——基于文献分析与述评[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(20): 6-13.