大学生数字囤积行为的探索性研究——基于个人信息管理视角

doi:10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.10.006

图书情报工作 ›› 2022, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (10): 74-88.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.10.006

大学生数字囤积行为的探索性研究——基于个人信息管理视角

贾明霞¹, 徐跃权¹, 赵宇翔²

1. 东北师范大学信息科学与技术学院长春 130117;
2. 南京理工大学经济管理学院南京 210094

收稿日期:2021-10-20 修回日期:2022-01-17 出版日期:2022-05-20 发布日期:2022-06-01
作者简介:贾明霞,硕士研究生,E-mail:3133175072@qq.com;徐跃权,教授,博士,硕士生导师;赵宇翔,教授,博士,博士生导师。

An Exploratory Study on College Students' Digital Hoarding Behaviors in Personal Information Management

Jia Mingxia¹, Xu Yuequan¹, Zhao Yuxiang²

1. School of Information Science and Technology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130117;
2. School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094

Received:2021-10-20 Revised:2022-01-17 Online:2022-05-20 Published:2022-06-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的/意义]结合当前数字信息时代数字囤积的普遍现象,厘清中式文化情境下大学生数字囤积的行为机理,规避数字囤积行为的病态性倾向,推进个人信息管理的发展创新。[方法/过程]采用扎根理论,利用Nvivo 12对30份访谈材料和爬取的知乎热帖进行三阶段编码,最终构建大学生数字囤积行为机理模型,对大学生数字囤积行为的表现特征和前因后果展开探索性研究,据此,从个人信息管理角度提出突破数字囤积困境对策与建议。[结果/结论]研究结果表明,大学生数字囤积行为呈现出不同的表现特征和多重类型;影响因素不仅包括数字信息本身和情感依恋,也包括数字个体、社会影响和技术赋权等方面的因素,且禀赋效应对数字囤积行为具有调节作用,数字囤积行为中未存在明显的性别差异,但男女受访者囤积的数字类型各有侧重。同时指出,大学生数字囤积行为的潜在后果涉及成本、自我损耗、病态及恶性循环多个方面。在此基础上,结合个人信息管理关键活动,对大学生突破数字囤积困境提供若干针对性建议。

关键词: 个人信息管理, 数字囤积, 数字仓鼠, 扎根理论, 影响因素, 潜在后果

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] Combined with the common phenomenon of digital hoarding in the current digital information age, clarify the behavior mechanism of college students' digital hoarding in the context of Chinese culture, to avoid the pathological tendency of digital hoarding behaviors, and promote the development and innovation of personal information management.[Method/Process] Based on the grounded theory, 30 interview materials and crawled Zhihu hot posts were coded in three stages by NVivo 12, and finally the behavior mechanism model of college students' digital hoarding behaviors was constructed to explore the performance characteristics, causes and consequences of college students' digital hoarding behaviors.[Result/Conclusion] The results show that college students' digital hoarding behavior presents different performance characteristics and multiple types; The influencing factors include not only digital information itself and emotional attachment, but also digital individuals, social influence and technological empowerment, and endowment effect can regulate digital hoarding behavior; There is no significant gender difference in digital hoarding behavior, but male and female respondents have different emphasis on the types of digital hoarding. On this basis, combined with the key activities of personal information management, this paper provides some targeted suggestions for college students to break through the dilemma of digital hoarding. The potential consequences of College Students' digital hoarding behavior involve cost, self loss, morbid and vicious circle.

Key words: personal information management, digital hoarding, digital hamster, grounded theory, influencing factors, potential consequences

中图分类号:

G203

贾明霞, 徐跃权, 赵宇翔. 大学生数字囤积行为的探索性研究——基于个人信息管理视角[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(10): 74-88.

Jia Mingxia, Xu Yuequan, Zhao Yuxiang. An Exploratory Study on College Students' Digital Hoarding Behaviors in Personal Information Management[J]. Library and Information Service, 2022, 66(10): 74-88.

参考文献

[1] 新民晚报,手机里三万张照片不愿删?也许你患上了"数码囤积症"[EB/OL].[2021-12-20].https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1628216005017056451&wfr=spider&for=pc,2019-03-17/.
[2] 人民日报,人民日报评论员随笔:"囤积知识"只是学习第一[EB/OL].[2021-12-20].http://m.people.cn/n4/2019/0902/c25-13143756.html,2019-09-02/.
[3] BAşKAN Ç. Entire history of you:research and design to manage digital hoarding[D]. Ankara,Turkey:Middle East Technical University, 2021.
[4] 陈春花.价值共生:数字化时代的组织管理[M].北京:人民邮电出版社,2021:25.
[5] 谢笑,谢阳群,占南.面向个人信息管理的个人记忆失误及其应对[J].图书情报工作, 2011, 55(24):27-31.
[6] LILYANN.人人都是数字仓鼠:我们为何越来越喜欢将信息存储到网上?[J].记者观察,2021(16):24-27.
[7] VAN BENNEKOM M J, BLOM R M, VULINK N, et al. A case of digital hoarding[J]. Bmj case reports, 2015,9:1-4.
[8] ORAVEC J A. Virtual hoarding[J].International journal of computers in clinical practice, 2018,3(1):27-39.
[9] HULBER C. Digital collection:what makes it different from digital hoarding?[J/OL]. 2020:23.[2021-10-01].https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343282119_Digital_Collection_What_makes_it_different_from_Digital_Hoarding.
[10] FROST R O, STEKETEE G, TOLIN D F. Comorbidity in hoarding disorder[J]. Focus, 2015, 13(2):244-251.
[11] BECK M. Drowning in email, photo, files? hoarding goes digital.[J]. Wall street journal- eastern edition, 2012, 259(71):D1-D5.
[12] LUXON A M, HAMILTO C E, BATES S, et al. Pinning our possessions:associations between digital hoarding and symptoms of hoarding disorder-sciencedirect[J]. Journal of obsessive-compulsive and related disorders, 2019, 21:60-68.
[13] VITALE F, JANZEN I, MCGRENERE J. Hoarding and minimalism:Tendencies in digital data preservation[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. New York:Association for Computing Machinery,2018:1-12.
[14] NEAVE N,BRIGGS P,MCKELLAR K,et al. Digital hoarding behaviours:measurement and evaluation[J]. Computers in human behavior,2019,96(7):72-77.
[15] NEAVE N, MCKELLAR K,SILLENCE E,et al. Digital hoarding behaviours:implications for cybersecurity[J]. Cyber influence and cognitive threats,2020,85(5):77-95.
[16] SWEETEN G, SILLENCE E,NEAVE N. Digital hoarding behaviours:underlying motivations and potential negative consequences[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2018, 85(8):54-60.
[17] MCKELLAR K,SILLENCE E, NEAVE N, et al. There is more than one type of hoarder:collecting, managing and hoarding digital data in the workplace[J]. Interacting with computers, 2020, 32(1):209-220.
[18] ALQUIST J L, BAUMEISTER R F. Foraging extends beyond food:hoarding of mental energy and information seeking in response to uncertainty[J]. Behavioral and brain sciences, 2019, 42(e35):17-18.
[19] BOZACI I,GÖKDENIZ I. Development of a digital photo hoarding scale:a research with undergraduate students[J].Management science letters, 2020,10(10):2193-2200.
[20] GORMLEY C J, GORMLEY S J. Data hoarding and information clutter:the impact on cost, life span of data, effectiveness, sharing, productivity, and knowledge management culture[J]. Issues in information systems, 2012, 13(2):90-95.
[21] STRASSER B J, EDWARDS P N. Big data is the answer … but what is the question?[J]. Osiris, 2017, 32(1):328-345.
[22] 郭海辉,韦小满,赵守盈,等.中文版数据囤积行为问卷测评大学生群体的信度与效度[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2020,28(3):492-495.
[23] 吴旭瑶,黄旭,李静.数字囤积行为量表的编制及信效度检验[J].心理技术与应用,2021,9 (2):116-125.
[24] 赵国捧.大学生囤积行为和囤积认知特点及其对人际关系的影响研究[D].贵阳:贵州师范大学,2017.
[25] 刘嫣,张海涛,李佳玮,等.移动终端视角下的老年用户在线健康信息搜寻行为影响因素研究[J].图书情报工作,2021,65(11):46-54.
[26] BUTTFIELD-ADDISON P S. Understanding and supporting personal information management across multiple platforms[D]. Hobart:University of Tasmania, 2014.
[27] 张力.移动终端与高校图书馆特色流媒体服务[J].情报科学,2009,27(5):739-742,746.
[28] MARSHALL C C. Rethinking personal digital archiving, part 1:four challenges from the field[J/OL]. D-lib magazine,2008,14(3).[2021-10-01].http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march08/marshall/03marshall-pt1.html.
[29] CUSHING A L. Self extension and the desire to preserve digital possessions[J]. Proceedings of the american society for information science and technology, 2011, 48(1):1-3.
[30] PECK J,BARGER V A,WEBB A. In search of a surrogate for touch:the effect of haptic imagery on perceived ownership[J]. Journal of consumer psychology, 2013, 23(2):189-196.
[31] 谢光明,蒋玉石,石纯来.考虑禀赋效应调节作用的网络口碑离散对消费者购买意愿的影响[J].管理学报,2019,16(3):425-438,455.
[32] SPARROW B,LIU J,WEGNER D M. Google effects on memory:cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips[J]. Science, 2011, 333(6043):776-778.
[33] THORPE S,BOLSTER A,NEAVE N. Exploring aspects of the cognitive behavioural model of physical hoarding in relation to digital hoarding behaviours[J]. Digital health, 2019,5(1):1-8.
[34] IVANOV V Z, DAVID M C, EVA S, et al. Prevalence, comorbidity and heritability of hoarding symptoms in adolescence:a population based twin study in 15-year olds[J]. Plos one, 2013, 8(7):e69140.
[35] ACAR Ö F, SEDA A. A preliminary investigation of digital hoarding behaviors of university executives[J]. European journal of digital economy research, 2020, 1(1):27-44.

大学生数字囤积行为的探索性研究——基于个人信息管理视角

An Exploratory Study on College Students' Digital Hoarding Behaviors in Personal Information Management

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	高凡, 徐思佳. 地市级政府数据开放中数据安全建设影响因素分析——基于21个地市级政府案例的csQCA联动效应分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(9): 90-99.
[2]	高凡, 欧阳娟. 公共图书馆法人治理结构政策执行影响因素及对策研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(8): 50-61.
[3]	尹娇, 朱小蕊, 完颜邓邓. 公共数字文化服务供给质量影响因素检验——基于链式中介模型[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(8): 62-72.
[4]	文禹衡, 付张祎. 基于扎根理论的我国数据要素确权地方立法策略及其调整[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(7): 53-66.
[5]	贾明霞, 赵宇翔, 宋小康. 人文学者数字囤积行为模式及形成机理探索——基于关键事件技术法的访谈[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(4): 55-67.
[6]	王雨馨, 阮建海, 邓小昭. 数字反哺视角下城市中老年人个人数字存档行为影响因素研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(3): 85-95.
[7]	朱玲玲, 茆意宏. 在线社区用户承诺影响因素研究：一项元分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(3): 106-118.
[8]	邓胜利, 贾哲宇, 夏苏迪, 王少辉. 网络用户算法推荐服务接受意愿与使用行为背离研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(2): 4-13.
[9]	邓胜利, 段文豪, 夏苏迪. PADM视角下算法推荐服务风险的用户应对行为研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(2): 14-22.
[10]	张庭玮, 朱沁雨, 宋德凤, 陈烨. 过滤气泡情境下用户行为及其形成机制研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(2): 64-75.
[11]	蒲青云, 黄体杨. 信息素养自我效能感影响因素元分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(17): 77-87.
[12]	朱富成, 刘永. 利用政策关联度指标进行学术影响力研究——以疫情防控档案政策关联度为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(14): 62-72.
[13]	支凤稳, 张萌. 科学数据共享意愿影响因素实证与仿真研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(13): 111-121.
[14]	袁红, 王焘. 政府数据开放可持续发展关键影响因素识别与作用机理分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(9): 53-65.
[15]	韦景竹, 操慧子, 张乐乐. 基于在线评论的公共文化云活动用户需求研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(9): 66-73.