图书情报工作 ›› 2022, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (11): 129-138.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.11.014

• 综述述评 • 上一篇    下一篇

科学合作的多样性研究综述

丁洁兰1,2, 刘细文1,2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院文献情报中心 北京 100190;
    2. 中国科学院大学经济与管理学院图书情报与档案管理系 北京 100190
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-10 修回日期:2022-02-11 出版日期:2022-06-05 发布日期:2022-06-18
  • 通讯作者: 刘细文,中心主任,研究员,博士生导师,通信作者,E-mail:liuxw@mail.las.ac.cn。
  • 作者简介:丁洁兰,副研究员,博士。

A Review of Research on Scientific Collaboration Diversity

Ding Jielan1,2, Liu Xiwen1,2   

  1. 1. National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;
    2. Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190
  • Received:2021-10-10 Revised:2022-02-11 Online:2022-06-05 Published:2022-06-18

摘要: [目的/意义] 科学合作的多样性是科学计量学领域"团队科学"研究主题中的一个新兴研究点,与以往线性视角下的合作特征不同,它是一种多维度、系统性视角下的结构性特征。对科学合作多样性的研究与梳理有助于理解科学合作的内在结构、本质和价值。[方法/过程] 对科学计量学领域的合作多样性相关研究进行评述:首先系统梳理和界定了科学合作多样性的类型和概念维度,基于作者属性将其定义为四大类共10种不同的合作多样性;其次从概念内涵、测度方法、效用分析3个维度,分别对各类型合作多样性进行研究评述;最后总结了现有研究不足并对未来研究做出展望。[结果/结论] 研究发现,现有文献更加偏重基于文献计量特征属性的合作多样性研究,而对个体属性与专业属性的合作多样性的研究较少,并且大多体现多样性概念框架的部分内涵;测度方法也以传统方法为主,使用新型多样性测度方法(考虑了相似性维度)较少;效用研究则以引文影响力的单一类型效用为主。未来研究需关注非文献计量属性的合作多样性类型,以及体现多样性概念完整内涵,探索包含相似性维度的多样性测度方法,在效用研究中需扩展质量层面的多类型效用研究,尤其需加强背后的成因分析。

关键词: 科学合作, 多样性, 作者属性, 科学计量学, 团队科学

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] Scientific collaboration diversity is an emerging research subject under the topic of "team science" in scientometrics. Different from the previous linear perspectives, scientific collaboration diversity (co-authorship diversity) is a multi-dimensional and systematic perspective that helps to understand the structure, nature and value of scientific collaboration. [Method/Process] This paper reviews the exsiting literature related to scientific collaboration diversity in scientometrics. Firstly, this paper systematically sorts out different types of scientific collaboration diversity and concept demestions of each type. Secondly, this paper reviews the ten types of scientific collaboration diversity under the four macro-categories, which defined by this paper, in terms of their concept demesions, measuring method, and utility types. Finally, this paper summarizes the existing research of scientific collaboration diversity and makes prospects for future research. [Result/Conclusion] Results show that the existing liearture is more focused on the bibliometric-attributes-based collaboration diversity, while less foused on the individual and discipinlary attributes based collaboration diversity. Most related researches only use part of the connotation of the ecological diversity conceptual framework. Generally, the measurement methods used in existing related research are more based on the traditional method while less based on the new method which takes into the similarity dimension into accout. The utility types in existing related research are relatively limited. The future research needs to focus on the non-bibliometric-attributes-based collaboration diversity, introducing or detecting new measuring methods based on the complete concept of diversity, and expanding more types of utility, especially strengthening the cause study in utility research.

Key words: scientific collaboration, diversity, author attributes, scientometrics, team science

中图分类号: