[1] BEAVER D B D, ROSEN R. Studies in scientific collaboration:part I. the professional origins of scientific co-authorship[J]. Scientometrics, 1978,1(1):65-84. [2] 王文平.基于科学计量的中国国际科技合作模式及影响研究[D].北京:北京理工大学, 2014. [3] WUCHTY S, JONES B F, UZZI B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge[J]. Science, 2007, 316(5827):1036-1039. [4] JONES B F, WUCHTY S, UZZI B. Multi-university research teams:shifting impact, geography, and stratification in science[J]. Science, 2008, 322(5905):1259-1262. [5] DING J L, SHEN Z S, AHLGREN P, et al. The link between ethnic diversity and scientific impact:the mediating effect of novelty and audience diversity[J]. Scientometrics, 2021:1-52. [6] GLÄNZEL W, LANGE C D. A distributional approach to multinationality measures of international scientific collaboration[J]. Scientometrics, 2002, 54(1):75-89. [7] GAZNI A, SUGIMOTO C R, DIDEGAH F. Mapping world scientific collaboration:authors, institutions, and countries[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012, 63(2):323-335. [8] HALL K L, VOGEL A L, HUANG G C, et al. The science of team science:a review of the empirical evidence and research gaps on collaboration in science[J]. American psychologist, 2018, 73(4):532-548. [9] STIRLING A. A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society[J]. Journal of the royal society interface, 2007,4(15):707-719. [10] CUMMINGS J N. Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization[J]. Management science, 2004,50(3):352-364. [11] SUZUKI Y, LU S H. Economies of product diversity in collaborative logistics[J]. Journal of business logistics, 2017,38(2):115-129. [12] 崔红,段宇锋,郦芳.基于机器学习的生物多样性英文文档语义标注研究[J].图书情报知识,2011(2):73-77. [13] 马晓悦.考虑观点多样性的社会化语义网知识组织模式探究[J].情报科学,2016,34(7):25-30. [14] PORTER A L, COHEN A S, ROESSNER J D, et al. Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity[J]. Scientometrics, 2007,72(1):117-147. [15] RAFOLS I, MEYER M. Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity:case studies in bionanoscience[J]. Scientometrics, 2009,82(2):263-287. [16] LEYDESDORFF L, RAFOLS I. Indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals:diversity, centrality, and citations[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2011,5(1):87-100. [17] LEINSTER T, COBBOLD C A. Measuring diversity:the importance of species similarity[J]. Ecology, 2012,93(3):477-489. [18] ZHANG L, ROUSSEAU R, GLÄNZEL W. Diversity of references as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of journals:taking similarity between subject fields into account[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016,67(5):1257-1265. [19] LEYDESDORFF L, WAGNER C S, BORNMANN L. Interdisciplinarity as diversity in citation patterns among journals:rao-stirling diversity, relative variety, and the Gini coefficient[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2019,13(1):255-269. [20] LARIVIÈRE V, HAUSTEIN S, BÖRNER K. Long-distance interdisciplinarity leads to higher scientific impact[J]. Plos one, 2015, 10(3):e0122565. [21] LARIVIÈRE V, GINGRAS Y. On the relationship between interdisciplinarity and scientific impact[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010,61(1):126-131. [22] YEGROS-YEGROS A, RAFOLS I, D ESTE P. Does interdisciplinary research lead to higher citation impact?the different effect of proximal and distal interdisciplinarity[J]. Plos one, 2015,10(8):e135095. [23] ZENG A, SHEN Z S, ZHOU J L, et al. The science of science:from the perspective of complex systems[J]. Physics reports, 2017,714-715:1-73. [24] GUAN J C, ZHANG J J, YAN Y. A dynamic perspective on diversities and network change:partner entry, exit and persistence[J]. International journal of technology management, 2017,74(1/4):221-242. [25] PANDZA K, WILKINS T A, ALFOLDI E A. Collaborative diversity in a nanotechnology innovation system:evidence from the EU framework programme[J]. Technovation, 2011,31(9):476-489. [26] WIRSICH A, KOCK A, STRUMANN C, et al. Effects of university-industry collaboration on technological newness of firms[J]. Journal of product innovation management, 2016,33(6):708-725. [27] GKYPALI A, FILIOU D, TSEKOURAS K. R & D collaborations:is diversity enhancing innovation performance?[J]. Technological forecasting and social change, 2017,118:143-152. [28] FAN X, YANG X W, CHEN L M.Diversified resources and academic influence:patterns of university-industry collaboration in Chinese research-oriented universities[J].Scientometrics, 2015, 104(2):489-509. [29] FRANCESCHET M,COSTANTINI A. The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2010, 4(4):540-553. [30] FEGLEY B D. Mechanisms driving the formation and success of collaborations between scientists in biomedicine[D]. Illinois:University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2016. [31] PONOMAREV I V, LAWTON B K, WILLIAMS D E, et al. Breakthrough paper indicator 2.0:can geographical diversity and interdisciplinarity improve the accuracy of outstanding papers prediction?[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 100(3):755-765. [32] DONG Y X, MA H, TANG J, et al. Collaboration diversity and scientific impact[J]. ArXiv, 2018,1806.03694. [33] ABBASI A, JAAFARI A. Research impact and scholars' geographical diversity[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2013, 7(3):683-692. [34] VANGEN S. Culturally diverse collaborations:a focus on communication and shared understanding[J]. Public management review, 2017,19(3):305-325. [35] FREEMAN R B, HUANG W. Collaborating with people like me:ethnic coauthorship within the United States[J]. Journal of labor economics, 2015, 33(S1):S289-S318. [36] 唐惠燕,陈蓉蓉,郑新艳,等.馆员合作研究中馆员多样性的考察与分析——基于南京农业大学图书馆的案例分析[J].图书情报工作, 2018, 62(11):64-71. [37] ZHANG L, SUN B B, CHINCHILLA-RODRÍGUEZ Z, et al. Interdisciplinarity and collaboration:on the relationship between disciplinary diversity in departmental affiliations and reference lists[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 117(1):271-291. [38] SHANNON C E. A mathematical theory of communication[J]. The bell system technical journal, 1948, 27:379-423,623-656. [39] FU Y H, HUANG C Y, SUN C T. Using global diversity and local topology features to identify influential network spreaders[J]. Physica a:statistical mechanics and its applications, 2015,433:344-355. [40] ALSHAMSI A, PIANESI F, LEPRI B, et al. Network diversity and affect dynamics:the role of personality traits[J]. Plos one, 2016,11(4):e152358. [41] EAGLE N, MACY M, CLAXTON R. Network diversity and economic development[J]. Science, 2010,328(5981):1029-1031. [42] SIMPSON E H. Measurement of diversity[J].Nature, 1949,163, 688. [43] GINI C. Measurement of inequality of incomes[J]. The economic journal, 1921, 31(121):124-126. [44] ALSHEBLI B K, RAHWAN T, WOON W L. The preeminence of ethnic diversity in scientific collaboration[J]. Nature communications, 2018, 9(1):1-10. [45] WU D S, LU X L, LI J P, et al. Does the institutional diversity of editorial boards increase journal quality?the case economics field[J]. Scientometrics, 2020, 124(2):1579-1597. [46] BADAL S, HARTER J K. Gender diversity, business-unit engagement, and performance[J]. Journal of leadership & organizational studies, 2014, 21(4):354-365. [47] GONZÁLEZ-MORENO Á, DÍAZ-GARCÍA C, SÁEZ-MARTÍNEZ F J. R & D team composition and product innovation:gender diversity makes a difference[J]. European journal of international management, 2018, 12(4):423-446. [48] MASTELLA M, VANCIN D, PERLIN M, et al. Board gender diversity:performance and risk of Brazilian firms[J]. Gender in management, 2021, 36(4):498-518. [49] CHAN H F, TORGLER B. Gender differences in performance of top cited scientists by field and country[J]. Scientometrics, 2020, 125(3):2421-2447. [50] ABRAMO G, AKSNES D W, D'ANGELO C A. Gender differences in research performance within and between countries:Italy vs Norway[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2021, 15(2):101144. [51] FORTIN J, BARTLETT B, KANTAR M, et al. Digital technology helps remove gender bias in academia[J]. Scientometrics, 2021, 126(5):4073-4081. [52] WU C J, YAN E J, ZHU Y J, et al. Gender imbalance in the productivity of funded projects:a study of the outputs of National Institutes of Health R01 grants[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2021,72(11):1386-1399. [53] KOU M T, ZHANG Y, ZHANG Y, et al. Does gender structure influence R & D efficiency?a regional perspective[J]. Scientometrics, 2020, 122(1):477-501. [54] METZ I, HARZING A W. Gender diversity in editorial boards of management journals[J]. Academy of management learning & education, 2009, 8(4):540-557. [55] DIETZ J S, CHOMPALOV I, BOZEMAN B, et al. Using the curriculum vita to study the career paths of scientists and engineers:an exploratory assessment[J]. Scientometrics, 2000, 49(3):419-442. [56] LI Y X, GONG Y P, BURMEISTER A, et al. Leveraging age diversity for organizational performance:an intellectual capital perspective[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 2021, 106(1):71. [57] BACKES-GELLNER U, VEEN S. Positive effects of ageing and age diversity in innovative companies-large-scale empirical evidence on company productivity[J]. Human resource management journal, 2013, 23(3):279-295. [58] HU Z G, CHEN C M, LIU Z Y. How are collaboration and productivity correlated at various career stages of scientists?[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 101(2):1553-1564. [59] LIANG L M, KRETSCHMER H, GUO Y Z, et al. Age structures of scientific collaboration in Chinese computer science[J]. Scientometrics, 2001, 52(3):471-486. [60] LIANG L M, GUO Y Z, DAVIS M. Collaborative patterns and age structures in Chinese publications[J]. Scientometrics, 2002, 54(3):473-489. [61] ROMANOV A, TEREKHOV A. The mathematical model of productivity-and age-structured scientific community evolution[J]. Scientometrics, 1997, 39(1):3-17. [62] KATZ J. Geographical proximity and scientific collaboration[J]. Scientometrics, 1994, 31(1):31-43. [63] WAGNER C S, WHETSELL T A, MUKHERJEE S. International research collaboration:novelty, conventionality, and atypicality in knowledge recombination[J]. Research policy, 2019, 48(5):1260-1270. [64] BORDONS M, APARICIO J, COSTAS R. Heterogeneity of collaboration and its relationship with research impact in a biomedical field[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 96(2):443-466. [65] BU Y, DING Y, XU J, et al. Understanding success through the diversity of collaborators and the milestone of career[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2018, 69(1):87-97. [66] ABRAMO G, D'ANGELO C A, ZHANG L. A comparison of two approaches for measuring interdisciplinary research output:the disciplinary diversity of authors vs the disciplinary diversity of the reference list[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2018, 12(4):1182-1193. [67] ZHANG W Y, SHI S S, HUANG X L, et al. The distinctiveness of author interdisciplinarity:a long-neglected issue in research on interdisciplinarity[J]. Journal of information science, 2022, 48(1):90-105. [68] BOGERS M, FOSS N J, LYNGSIE J. The"human side"of open innovation:the role of employee diversity in firm-level openness[J]. Research policy, 2018, 47(1):218-231. [69] ZHANG L Y, GUO H Y. Enabling knowledge diversity to benefit cross-functional project teams:joint roles of knowledge leadership and transactive memory system[J]. Information & management, 2019, 56(8):103156. [70] ZHANG G Y, TANG C Y. How R & D partner diversity influences innovation performance:an empirical study in the nano-biopharmaceutical field[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 116(3):1487-1512. [71] VAN BEERS C, ZAND F. R & D cooperation, partner diversity, and innovation performance:an empirical analysis[J]. Journal of product innovation management, 2014, 31(2):292-312. [72] TARAS V, BAACK D, CAPRAR D, et al. Diverse effects of diversity:disaggregating effects of diversity in global virtual teams[J]. Journal of international management, 2019, 25(4):100689. [73] LIAO C H. How to improve research quality?examining the impacts of collaboration intensity and member diversity in collaboration networks[J]. Scientometrics, 2010,86(3):747-761. [74] 许玉婵,梁启华,张春阳.跨国科学合作网络结构的多样性特征及动态演化研究——以知识管理领域为例[J].知识管理论坛, 2017(3):214-223.作者贡献说明:丁洁兰:提出论文研究框架,进行文献调研与理论研究,撰写与修改论文;刘细文:提出研究问题,修改研究框架及论文。 |