高级检索|图表检索

图书情报工作 ›› 2022, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (17): 129-140.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.17.012

• 综述述评 • 上一篇    下一篇

我国学术代表作评价研究进展

杨瑞仙1,2, 高鑫宁1, 董克3   

  1. 1. 郑州大学信息管理学院 郑州 450001;
    2. 郑州市数据科学研究中心 郑州 450001;
    3. 武汉大学信息管理学院 武汉 430072
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-12 修回日期:2022-07-05 出版日期:2022-09-05 发布日期:2022-09-09
  • 作者简介:杨瑞仙,副院长,教授,博士,硕士生导师,E-mail:yrx@zzu.edu.cn;高鑫宁,硕士研究生;董克,副教授,博士,硕士生导师。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家社会科学基金项目"面向代表作评价的科研论文学术价值测度研究"(项目编号:21CTQ017)研究成果之一。

Research Progress on Evaluation of Academic Representative Works in China

Yang Ruixian1,2, Gao Xinning1, Dong Ke3   

  1. 1. School of Information Management, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001;
    2. Zhengzhou Data Science Research Center, Zhengzhou 450001;
    3. School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072
  • Received:2022-04-12 Revised:2022-07-05 Online:2022-09-05 Published:2022-09-09

PDF

摘要： [目的/意义]通过梳理我国学术代表作评价研究的现状和发展脉络,厘清当前研究方向,归纳总结相关研究的特点,为学术代表作及其相关领域的研究提供参考和借鉴。[方法/过程]采用文献调研法和内容分析法,在广泛深入阅读国内相关文献的基础上,从概念内涵、特征规律、遴选标准、评价方法、实践应用5个方面较为详尽地梳理国内学术代表作研究的主要成果和研究现状,并进行总结与展望。[结果/结论]国内学术代表作评价研究涉及多个层面,取得了丰硕成果,也存在一些不足之处。目前研究重点是代表作的评价方法,尚未形成统一的代表作评价方法,且实证研究较少。未来研究中应该加强分类评价、信息化评价,引入第三方评价,更加注重学术成果本身的质量,构建基于文本内容和引文网络两个层面的学术代表作评价。

关键词: 学术代表作, 学术评价, 评价方法

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] By sorting out the current situation and development context of the evaluation and research of academic representative works in China, clarifying the current research direction, summarizing the characteristics of related research, this paper provides references for future research in academic representative works and related fields.[Method/Process] The literature research method and the content analysis method were used to systematically sort out the main achievements and research status of the relevant research of domestic academic representative works from five aspects of the conceptual connotations, characteristic law, selection criteria, evaluation methods and practical application, on the basis of extensive and in-depth reading of relevant domestic literature, and summarized and looked forward.[Result/Conclusion] The evaluation research of domestic academic representative works involve multiple levels, has achieved fruitful results, and there are also some shortcomings. At present, the research focuses on the evaluation methods of representative works, and has not yet formed a unified evaluation method of representative works, and there are few empirical studies. In the future research, we should strengthen classification evaluation and information evaluation, introduce third-party evaluation, pay more attention to the quality of academic achievements themselves, and build an evaluation of academic representative works based on the two levels of text content and citation network.

Key words: academic representative works, academic evaluation, evaluation method

中图分类号: